-
Anonymous users2024-02-11d. The so-called public world refers to the transformation from aristocratic politics to bureaucratic politics, and does not reflect the characteristics of bureaucratic politics.
And if you look closely at that analysis, you can see that the correct answer is D, and it is estimated that he was wrong when he typed the answer
-
Anonymous users2024-02-10The statement that "the so-called public world refers to the transformation from aristocratic politics to bureaucratic politics" is correct, but D does not reflect it. In the past, the people belonged to the local princes under the feudal system, but after the implementation of the county system, the people no longer belonged to the feudal monarchs. Choose A.
I asked the teacher, and he said that people are thinking too complicated.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-09Our desert poplar teacher said: The topic of this question is "maybe", that is, it is not absolutely forbidden, so it cannot be said to be the protection of private property.
People can enter other people's land if the landowner allows it; If the landlord does not allow it, people have to keep themselves from entering other people's land.
-
Anonymous users2024-02-081) The material treats foreigners as brothers "of the same family", based on the same religious beliefs; Material 2 kills all foreigners, depending on religious beliefs. (4 points) (2) The first material does not see that the foreign invaders are essentially the same as the Qing ** rulers; Material 2 is blindly xenophobic and cannot accept advanced foreign things. (2 points) (3) The peasant class has no scientific theories to guide them.
2 points) (4) The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement was mainly anti-feudal, and at the same time shouldered the task of anti-aggression, which dealt a heavy blow to the reactionary forces at home and abroad. The Boxer Rebellion was mainly anti-imperialist, which prevented the arrogant plan of the imperialists to carve up China and hastened the demise of the Qing Dynasty. (4 points).
-
Anonymous users2024-02-071.Material 1 is an ally to a foreigner! Material 2: Hostile attitude towards foreigners!!
Taiping Heavenly Kingdom: In order to create disputes, misunderstandings and separations between us, the Boxers: All the devils will be killed, and the Qing Dynasty will unify Qingshengping.
2.They only recognize the foreigners' side one-sidedly, and they don't fundamentally realize that there is a major problem on their own side!
3.The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom wanted to unite foreigners against the Manchu regime!
The Boxers were defending the fall of the Manchu regime!!
4. Different from the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, overthrow the Manchu regime, and establish an ideal country!
It was a historic moment that hastened the fall of the expired regime!
The Boxers maintained the Qing ** and drove away the invaders!
It highlights the fighting spirit of the people to defend their homeland!
-
Anonymous users2024-02-06I will give 5 points for two questions, and I will answer 20 points for the landlord's generosity.
b, looking at the essence through the phenomenon, the state has deregulated.
Choosing option A is a more general, and it is clear that both the United States and Britain have established relatively advanced democratic political systems after the bourgeois revolution, and if you are not sure, you can use the method of elimination. In option b, both the U.S. and U.K. systems have their own merits, and it cannot be said that they are superior or inferior; c The British royal family is hereditary, a symbolic head of state, and has no real power, but the real ** head is the prime minister, and it is also democratically elected; There is no objection to the separation of powers and checks and balances in the United States, and there are also checks and balances in the United Kingdom, which is mainly manifested in the relationship between the executive and the legislative, and the judiciary and the legislature. >>>More
Let the mixed solution be xmol l
Then there is a carbonic heel of the Na+ corresponding. >>>More
I m sorry this question is out of line
Now that you have the answer, let me explain the third question you need. >>>More