History problem, solve, thank you! Solve the 12th history question, thank you!

Choosing option A is a more general, and it is clear that both the United States and Britain have established relatively advanced democratic political systems after the bourgeois revolution, and if you are not sure, you can use the method of elimination. In option b, both the U.S. and U.K. systems have their own merits, and it cannot be said that they are superior or inferior; c The British royal family is hereditary, a symbolic head of state, and has no real power, but the real ** head is the prime minister, and it is also democratically elected; There is no objection to the separation of powers and checks and balances in the United States, and there are also checks and balances in the United Kingdom, which is mainly manifested in the relationship between the executive and the legislative, and the judiciary and the legislature.

Hope it helps you understand!

Elect a Britain has a parliamentary constitutional monarchy, and the United States has a ** democratic republic, both of which are bourgeois democratic systems.

B: The political system between countries cannot be judged absolutely whether it is good or bad, as long as the political system suits the national conditions of the country, it is a good political system.

C: The head of the United States is **, indirectly elected by the people; The head of the United Kingdom is the Prime Minister, who is elected by Parliament, and the head of state of the United Kingdom is the King, which is hereditary.

D: The United States and the United Kingdom both have checks and balances.

ab. This kind of answer is obviously not necessary, and the advantages and disadvantages of these two systems cannot be easily judged.

c. The King of England is not the head of the country, the head of the country is the prime minister, not hereditary.

d. All are separation of powers and checks and balances.

I think that bourgeois democracy is "a political system based on the private ownership of the capitalist means of production." Bourgeois democracy was formed after the victory of the bourgeois revolutions in England and France. The United States is undoubtedly a bourgeois democracy.

b is clearly incorrect, and different national conditions are suitable for different political systems.

The head of the United Kingdom in C is the prime minister and is elected, not hereditary.

There is also a separation of powers in the United Kingdom, but it is not as clear as in the United States.

The title is that the scholar Vala questioned the contents of the Book of Confederacy's Favor, and concluded that the content of Emperor Constantine's grant of Western European lands to the pope recorded in the book was forged by the Church; Then this is a process of a rational person resisting pressure to expose the facts, then the option is D, let's analyze them one by one, a, the subject is questioning Roman Catholicism, and does not involve Protestantism, and the emergence of Protestantism was not until the 16th century, and Valla in the 15th century was not yet in touch, so A is wrong; b, the subject of the event is the ownership of the land, which does not involve the nature of God, the nature of the church, and therefore has nothing to do with the theoretical basis of theology, so b is also wrong; c, the divine right of the monarch is the legitimacy requirement of the feudal monarch's right to administer, it is embodied in the authorization of God to the human monarch, then the subject of the event is the right of the monarch to manage the church land authorized by the monarch to God, so it is inverted with the divine right of the monarch, and the divine right of the monarch does not apply here, so C is also wrong;

You are attacking theocracy, this notion is wrong, he is using the Bible and history as a basis to deny the truth of this "sacred text". His theory is still based on the Bible, he believes in God, and what he questions is only that the sect is acting in the name of God, which is false. It represents the rational thinking of people.

Think rationally and then find out.

You may have a misunderstanding, thinking must be denied God, in the Enlightenment period, in fact, did not deny God, but learned how to think theoretically, which can be understood as scientific thinking. Before it is time to criticize God, if you think about Newton in his later years, he was actually thinking about the existence of God in a scientific way.

It is also rational to think scientifically based on the theory of God's foundation. Think of ancient naïve materialism!

It reflects that people are in an equal relationship.

The ancient inhabitants of Hemudu lived in the Yangtze River basin, which was rainy and humid, so that the house was isolated from the ground, which could not only prevent snakes, insects and beasts, but also avoid moisture.

The semi-crypt house is the ancient inhabitants of Banpo to reflect the cold and dry of the Yellow River Basin at that time, with fire in the pit wall and pit ground roasting, to make the foundation of the house, in the pit erection of a pillar to support the thatched roof, cover on the pit, he is half on the ground and half in the ground, so it is called a semi-crypt house. This kind of house can be very warm and improve the survivability of the door.

Smart ABC typing is really strenuous).

According to material 1, it can be seen that Confucius advocated governing the country with benevolence and self-cultivation; As far as I can see, the essence of "etiquette" should start from the individual, from daily words and deeds. At the same time, propriety is also a way to be benevolent.

Material 2 and Material 3 both talk about governing the country and herdsmen, but the former advocates persuading the good with good, and the latter advocates using evil police to seek the good of the people. The former is the Confucian idea of benevolence; The latter is the Legalist idea of governing the country according to law.

1. The political ideal of Confucius is to make the princes respect Zhou Tianzi.

Return to the era of the Three Emperors and Five Emperors, when the politics were clear and the princes were harmonious. This further confirms Confucius' attitude towards slavery--- which is to keep it as it is.

1 Mainly refers to the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence put forward by China in 1953 to resolve the Sino-Indian border issue, in 1954 China participated in the Geneva Conference for the first time as one of the five great powers, and in 1955 China participated in the Bandung Conference, proposing to "seek common ground while reserving differences", resolve disputes, and promote the smooth convening of the conference.

The ninth APEC meeting was held in Shanghai, China.