Can a remarried woman ask for her ex husband s mother s property?

In principle, no, in individual cases, but it is difficult to depend on the evidence you provide. Now I will tell me about the circumstances under which you can get a share of the property or part of the property or the money associated with the property.

1.The real estate situation that can be divided, borrowing a name to buy a house. The difficulty lies in not only proving that the house belongs to the two of you and the young couple, but also that there is an agreement between the young couple and the old couple to buy a house in their names.

2.If you can't get a house, but you can divide part of the money, you can get a creditor's right. If you can't prove that there is an agreement between you to borrow your name to buy a house, but you can provide that you have contributed part of the purchase price, the court will determine that part of the purchase price (including loan repayment) you have borrowed from you to the old couple.

In the event of a divorce, you can claim that the debt is part of the joint property of the two young couples and divide it.

After remarrying, if the ex-husband's mother is willing to give her the house, then it is acceptable for her to be used as coal, it is the ex-mother-in-law's own will, and others have no right to interfere.

Both of them are divorced, and there is no relationship in essence, where does the right to claim other people's property? Even if you get married, there is no inheritance right granted to the daughter-in-law by law.

Only blood relatives are related to personal property, you are a foreign daughter-in-law, or divorced, where do you have the right, from the moral point of view, from the legal point of view.

Divorce refers to the legal act of dissolving the marital relationship and terminating the rights and obligations between the husband and wife through agreement or litigation. According to the provisions of China's "Marriage Law", if the relationship has indeed broken down and mediation fails, the divorce should be granted. "The relationship between husband and wife has indeed broken down" is a legal condition for a divorce.

Dissolution of marriage refers specifically to the dissolution of the relationship between husband and wife through legal procedures.

The relationship has indeed broken down" is a substantive requirement and a legal condition for granting a divorce. "Failure of mediation" is a procedural provision and cannot be regarded as a statutory condition for a divorce. Mediation should be carried out in the trial of divorce cases, and many cases in which mediation is ineffective are cases where the relationship has indeed broken down, and in this sense, "mediation is ineffective" is a reflection of "the relationship has indeed broken down".

In some divorce cases, although "mediation is ineffective", it is not "the relationship between the husband and wife has indeed broken down". In mediation work, there are often differences between focus and ineffectiveness, in-depth and in-depth, etc., which directly affect the mediation effect. Years of civil trial practice have shown that the meanings of "mediation failure" and "relationship has indeed broken down" are not exactly the same, and "mediation failure" is not the same as "relationship has indeed broken down".

Therefore, "ineffective mediation" should not be used as a basis for determining that "the relationship has indeed broken down". In trial practice, it is not necessary to completely equate "the relationship has indeed broken down" with "mediation has failed". Nor should "mediation fail" simply be used as a sign that "feelings have indeed broken down".

Don't even use "ineffective mediation" as a legal condition for deciding a divorce. The legal condition for a divorce is only that "the relationship has broken down".

The other party's will says that it will be given to you, then you can divide it, but if there is no will, you have no right to share.

The so-called will refers to the personal disposition of the testator's estate or other affairs in accordance with the law within the scope permitted by law during his lifetime, and takes effect when the testator dies. A will has the following characteristics:

1. A will is a unilateral legal act.

That is, a will is a legal act that can produce the expected legal consequences based on the testator's unilateral expression of will.

2. The testator must have full capacity for civil conduct.

Persons with limited capacity for conduct and persons without civil capacity do not have testamentary capacity and cannot make a will.

3. The establishment of a will cannot be carried out**.

The content of the will must be the true expression of the testator's intentions, and should be made by the testator himself, not by others. If it is a scrivener will, it must also be signed by the person himself.

Fourth, in case of emergency, the oral form can be used.

Moreover, it is required that two or more witnesses be present to witness, and if the testator is able to make a will in written form or in recorded form after the critical situation is lifted, the oral will made will become invalid.

5. A will is an act that takes legal effect only when the testator dies.

Because a will is a disposition of the ownership of the testator's property after his death by means of a will before his death, and it can be changed or revoked before his death, the will must be based on the death of the testator as a condition for taking effect.

According to the provisions of the Inheritance Law, when the spouse dies, if the other party bears the main obligation to support the spouse's parents, he or she may be regarded as the first heir in line to the throne;

In other words, only if the spouse has fulfilled the primary maintenance obligation to the spouse's parents after widowhood, he or she has the right to claim inheritance from the spouse's parents, and conversely, if the primary maintenance obligation is not fulfilled, the marital relationship will be terminated after the death of the spouse and the inheritance of the spouse's parents will also be lost.

Therefore, generally speaking, a widowed wife who has remarried is not normally entitled to claim the inheritance of her ex-husband's parents due to her change in legal status and obligations.

Can that woman go to her ex-husband's mother's property? This is not okay, because you have already remarried, and if you don't, you can ask them for real estate.

Can a remarried woman ask for her mother's estate? I think. A woman after remarriage. Don't ask for your ex-husband's mother's property anymore.

They all remarried, and it has nothing to do with the people and property of the ex-husband's family, or not.

I think since you have remarried, and before you remarried, your ex-husband's property has been divided, so how can you be in the real estate of your parents at this time, I don't think it's possible.

You've already remarried, why do you want to do it before? What about the parents' property? Specifically, if you change the price or not, it was your mother-in-law's real estate before you changed it, and no one would go to it.

You blew up your ex-husband's mother's inheritance, what do you have to inherit again? If he had a son, he would.

Of course, a woman who remarries cannot ask for the property of her ex-husband's mother.

Because since the divorce has not been a family.

Can a remarried woman ask for her ex-husband's mother's property? A remarried woman is not allowed to ask for the property of her ex-husband's mother, but his young children can apply.

Can a woman ask for her ex-husband's mother's property after remarrying? Probably not.

A remarried woman has no right to her ex-husband's mother's property.