I have been bothered for a long time by high math problems, math problems, I have been bothered for

Updated on healthy 2024-05-24
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The same operation on both sides of the equal sign still holds, what is there to doubt?

    If both sides do the same operation, the properties of both sides change, and the properties of both sides change, then it's troublesome!

    Shouldn't all calculations have to be reconsidered!

    I don't know how you thought of this problem, but this is actually what everyone thinks is an axiom!

    See what you mean.

    But according to you, I think it's easy to explain.

    Since you say that y is a function of x, it means that as long as x is constant, y must be constant, and we can easily understand this according to the property that the value of the function and the independent variable are one-to-one! According to the possibility that x is a constant and y is not a constant, there is no such thing as a constant!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    That's just a coincidence. You can't overturn a mathematical theory with occasional coincidences.

    Not every formula is true.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    hhhh!I know here!

    An integral is the number before a derivative is reduced to a derivative, if a(x)=b(x).

    The derivative of a(x) = the derivative of b(x), and conversely, the derivative of a(x) = the derivative of b(x).

    a(x)=b(x),xdx =2ydy,see xdx,2ydy as two equal numbers,xdx= 2ydy,

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    First-order differential form invariance.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Solution: Share a solution.

    k^3+6k^2+11k+5=(k+3)(k+2)(k+1)-1,∑[k^3+6k^2+11k+5]/(k+3)!=∑[(k+3)(k+2)(k+1)-1]/(k+3)!=∑1/(k!)-1/[(k+3)!]

    Control e x= (x n) (n!).)(n=0,1,……e=∑1/(n!)。

    k=1,2,……n, n, 1 (k!)=e-1,∑1/[(k+3)!]=e-1-1/2!-1/3!, original = (e-1)-(e-1-1 2!-1/3!)=1/2+1/6=2/3。

    FYI.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Subtract the small area from the big one. Large areas are easy to calculate.

    aqui te amo。

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The odd function f(0) = 0.

    x→0,lim f(x) =f'(0)

    But f(x) is undefined at point 0.

    You can go to the break point.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    bf(x) is an odd function, so f(0)=0, and limf(x)=f when x approaches 0'(0) with Lobid.

    And f(0) is meaningless, so it is a class of discontinuities.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    1) If 0

    Let the original = a

    lna = 1 n ln [ 1+x n +(x 2) n ] by the signifier of the law of Lopida.

    lim(n→+∞lna

    x^n lnx + x²/2)^n ln(x²/2) ]1+x^n +(x²/2)^n ]

    If 12, then 0

    2, original = x 2

    It can be combined and is the original = max

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Suppose there are 12 numbers in total, and you know that the result is 78, and you say that the result is that the last number is 78

    Or is the sum of 12 numbers 78?

    The first digit is compared to the latter digit.

    Is the previous number incremented gradually, is it increased randomly, or is it the same number each time?

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Average 78 12=

    The last number.

    Mean difference (I won't write about it later, because it's not an integer.) Maybe you're having the wrong number. Let's take a look.

Related questions
6 answers2024-05-24

Tangent equations, right?

f(x) is a continuous function with a period of 5. >>>More

18 answers2024-05-24

The inverse of a = a adjoint matrix iai

So, (3a) inverse-2 times a adjoint matrix = inverse of a 3-2a adjoint matrix = adjoint matrix of 2a 3-2a adjoint matrix = adjoint matrix of 4a 3 >>>More

11 answers2024-05-24

When x->0, x and sinx are equivalent infinitesimal quantities, so replacing all x's with sinx gives : >>>More

13 answers2024-05-24

The calculation of the example problem should make the trembling error, the method is as follows, the ruler slips and respects the tomb carefully. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-24

1. The formula you are seeking can be rewritten to the 1 n power of (1+n 2), for which you can use the second of the two important limits to rewrite, and the rewriting result is the n-squares of [(1+2 n)'s n 2nd power], and the limit result in the brackets is e, so you get the n-squares of e, find the limit for it, and the result is 1(Maybe I'm not very clear, but if you write down what I'm saying with a pen on paper, you'll understand.) ) >>>More