Individual extreme animal protectors are ridiculous

Hey LZ, it's illegal to eat sharks. Those sharks are very pitiful, they have been cut off from their fins while they are still alive, and their flesh is blurred. Cutting off the shark fin is useless, but without the shark fin they can't live.

Dog meat can be eaten, and most dog meat** is carnivorous dogs used for breeding. But there are those who steal pet dogs, and there are those who poison them, and one of my sister's dogs was poisoned right under everyone's noses!! Why are those people doing that!!

About the food chain. My personal view is that man is not at the top of the food chain, and he must not eat all animals. This will only highlight the pathos and ugliness of human great humanism and the greed of human beings themselves.

You know, some animals are going extinct, there are only 10 white rhinos left in northern India, and only 3,000 white cranes left in China, but that's only a part.

Protecting animals is everyone's responsibility, but don't go overboard. That's my opinion.

Individuals have their own principles, and sometimes even their principles are unreasonable. You're not talking about extreme animal protectors, but dog lovers. You have to believe that their love for dogs is far more than you think, and far more than you are.

Forgive my Word, you will be favored by God)

To be honest, extreme animal protectors are like an S*, so protect animals, eat woolen meat, change to vegetarian diet, no, eat soil. Protect the dog or something, while recalling the taste of dog meat, while barking that you are not allowed to kill the dog. There's no one else in this brain!!

I don't care if he protects his dog or not, and they don't have the right to do anything with someone else's dog.

The protection of extreme animals is a way to protect rights by infringing on the rights and interests of others; For the purpose of obtaining economic benefits from the segment code; With cats and dogs as the core, it is believed that the right to life of cats and dogs is equal to or higher than human rights; Take pride in doxing others and maliciously attacking others.

On the list of terrorist organizations of the British intelligence services, in addition to the well-known names of ISIS, there are also a number of extremist animal protection groups.

They attacked companies and medical research institutions in the UK, released and dismantled experimental animals, violated privacy, insulted others and threatened others to pose a security threat, and even resorted to arson and other abnormal means to achieve their goals when they thought that normal means would have little effect, which is reminiscent of terrorism.

I've always thought that some animal protectionists are either overflowing with love, stupid, or bad.

Everything should also be measured. There should also be an appropriate degree of protection of animals, and when the word "ism" is added to protect animals, there will often be extreme behaviors. If you really equate humans with other animals, there is a problem in itself.

If you are a human, you must first focus on the human being, and then on the animal. There are already many things about human beings themselves, and there are many problems that exist, and there are enough reasons to pay attention. I don't want to specifically refute the conservationists, many of whose theories are logically wrong.

I only think that the protection of people and animals is a cover, and as for what purpose they want to achieve, that is their true essence. In the end, a lot of it is bad.

They care about animals, and on the surface, they have a great disregard for people. Animals will find all kinds of excuses when they hurt people, but they often neglect to care for people. They love animals on the surface, but they are a set of hypocrisy after people.

For example? Forget it. There are on the Internet.

Red-crowned cranes, white swans, green peacocks, and many other birds drink by the stream or fly in the air – the Shuangta Mountain Bird Forest is a paradise for birds.

Bird Language Forest - Chengde Wildlife Rescue Center.

In addition to the birds we bought from other places, a large part of them were rescued and donated here by the citizens of Chengde. Fu Qiang, the person in charge of Bird Language Forest, has a deep understanding of Chengde's awareness of "loving and protecting birds".

In 2004, the public donated 12 birds of various kinds to the Bird Language Forest, most of which belong to the third category of national protected animals.

In Fu Qiang's memory, there are two things that are particularly unforgettable, "There is an old lady in her seventies, and her son is quite filial. In order to change the taste of the elderly, I bought a pheasant (pheasant) for my mother at the market. But the old lady couldn't bear to kill the pheasant, so she gave it to Bird Yulin.

There is also an individual boss in Damiao Town, Shuangluan District, who picked up an injured golden eagle, which belongs to the national first-class protected animal. The individual boss did not hide the golden eagle or sell it privately, but sent it to the Bird Language Forest through the town **. ”

When people find injured birds or animals, they will take the initiative to contact our rescue center or the local forestry bureau, and many rare animals whose lives are dying have been saved. There are many examples that show that our people in Chengde have a strong awareness of wildlife protection. ”

The growing awareness of the people of Chengde to protect wildlife and natural ecology has brought positive consequences; Because of the good protection of the ecological environment, all counties and districts have actively planted trees, and the vegetation has recovered quickly. In the past year or two, the number of wild animals in various mountainous and forest areas of Chengde has increased rapidly. The most obvious example is the No. 1 grassland in northern Beijing, which undertakes the task of "preventing wind and fixing sand, conserving water sources, and protecting Beijing and Tianjin"; In the last century, due to excessive land reclamation, indiscriminate logging, and overloading of livestock, the ecological environment of the first grassland in northern Beijing has been damaged, and common wild animals have disappeared.

Five or six years ago, the first grassland in northern Beijing began to implement projects such as returning farmland to forest, afforestation in Qiansongba, fencing and planting grass, and enclosing grasslands, and the ecological environment of the grassland was rapidly improved, and the natural scenery of deep grass and dense forests reappeared, and some long-lost wild animals such as wolves, foxes, roe deer, badgers, and hares appeared in the grassland and forests again. When the ecological environment is good, not only the animals benefit, but also the people on the grassland. Relying on the development of eco-tourism, the common people in the grasslands of northern Beijing have lived a prosperous and happy life.

In recent years, online violence has spread like a virus online, and recently, a girl also lost her life at the age of 27 because of online violence. The so-called "animal protectors" chill people and express incomprehension.

Many people think that they are doing good deeds, and even think that they are contributing to society, and protecting animals is a good thing, but when you judge a person's character casually regardless of good or bad, then your actions will deteriorate, I don't know what those so-called "animal protectors" think today? How many lives do you want to carry?

There is also a piece of news that makes people question the actions of the "animal protectors".

I often see anglers by the river, most of them are some old grandfathers who come to the park or the river to exercise and fish, which has also become their hobby, fishermen also rely on fishing in the sea for a living, there is nothing wrong with fishing, think about the fish we usually eat and even chickens, ducks and geese, can't we all slaughter them? Isn't the so-called "protection" another way of "doing"?

The other day, I saw a **, abroad. Several animal protectors snatched a homeless man's dog, the homeless man in ** looks particularly pitiful, there may be some people who don't understand abroad, many types of high homeless people are better to their dogs than themselves, even if they are hungry, they will let the dog eat, because they think that only the dog can accompany them, but the only dog that accompanies them has also left themselves, I don't know the collapse of the homeless man's heart, I can only silently bless him in my heart.

The so-called "animal protectors" should also pay attention to their own behavior, you can protect animals, but don't take extremes, with the correct state of the scale to look at the simple ridge to protect animals, just like the animal protector Liu Xiaoyun, her approach has been praised and admired by many people.

In fact, as an animal protector, if you take the right way to love animals, you can be recognized and praised by everyone, may each of us be the most beautiful angel, and may each of us treat animals with the right attitude, and may Capitan be all the best in heaven.