Let s take a look at the price and performance of the Stica and Galaxy Mc 2

In terms of brand, STIGA and Galaxy are not at the same level of players, the former is a world famous brand, the latter is a domestic brand, in terms of use effect, the former is generally better, without considering the **, of course, the former is much better.

There are many more suitable for direct shooting: oc cl ta tl eg red and black nano oc. **All are fine.

MC-2 Many people say that it is like OC, it may be a microcrystalline that imitates STIGA, but it is harder than OC, and the ball is very good, but it should be the second time to compare the materials (the first batch of MC 2 materials are very good), the bottom strength is not very good, the ball arc is low, and the feel is more like MC-2 is not very suitable for straight boards Of course, the cost performance is higher than STIGA

STIGA's pure wood boards are basically below 700 yuan, and Tube All is commonly known as the all-round tube king

Of course, MC-2 is also OK, but the premise is that you can play in an arc circle and will pull horizontally, and there is no way to compare with OC, not enough to shock and pull.

A lot. There are many more suitable for direct shooting: oc cl ta tl eg red and black nano oc. **All are fine.

MC-2 many people say that it is like OC, it may be a microcrystalline that imitates STIGA, but it is harder than OC, and the ball is very good, but it should be compared with the materials (the first batch of MC 2 materials are very good), the bottom strength is not very good, the arc of the ball is low, and the feel is not comparable with OC, not enough to shock and pull.

I feel that the MC-2 is not very suitable for straight boards, and the cost performance is of course higher than that of STIGA

STIGA's pure wood boards are basically below 700 yuan, and Tube All is commonly known as the all-round tube king

Of course, MC-2 is fine, but only if you play in an arc and can also pull horizontally

In terms of brand, STIGA and Galaxy are not at the same level of players, the former is a world famous brand, the latter is a domestic brand, in terms of use effect, the former is generally better, without considering the **, of course, the former is good.

I prefer the Galaxy.,That's the practice board.,If it's a master.,Choose Stica Maybe It's more verified.,Recommend one.,Galaxy MC-4,Very light.,It's crystal-plated.,It's very easy to use.,Forehand with Tianji 2 or Hurricane 3,Backhand G666 or Hurricane 2,That's called a cool。

Stika is an international famous brand, and the cost performance is good, mainly because of the excellent feel. The Galaxy also has a good baseplate, but you have to choose carefully, it's not as classic as the Stica's baseplate.

Since stiga's things are imported, it depends on your luck If you get the first licensed goods made in Sweden, then congratulations, the world-class things are in your hands; And the Galaxy is absolutely first-class workmanship, cost-effective, and our people love to use it.

Oh S-5000 domestic OEM board is not as good as the Galaxy's 100 yuan board It is recommended that the Galaxy MC-2 is not expensive, plus two good rubber pieces are about 200 yuan

Silkika's is similar to the galaxy's, if you are a master, then you should use Silkika's, its bottom plate (hollow) is light, the attack is fast, and the pull is average. I like to attack, so I prefer to use Setika!

Stiga eg, OC, all are not bad, ** also moderate.

MC-2 and OC's ** are a lot different, they must be different.

Galaxy is mainly imitation imported bottom plate, they can use some cheaper plates to achieve the effect close to those imported plates, due to the basic materials are different, so the effect will not be so high, but the cost performance is absolutely super value.

Technique comes first, and as an amateur recreation, the psychology of the game is also very important, but buying a slightly better paddle can also help. But it's not the first one, there is a person in our company who plays better than me, and there is a person whose racket seems to have been picked up somewhere. So I think if you're an amateur and buy a galaxy, we have people here who play Stica's, but it's not the opponent of the aforementioned people.

The board itself is not much different, it mainly depends on your playing style. The quality of domestic boards is poor and easy to break. There is also a large gap between the grip of the handle, which directly affects the feel. I feel that the handle shape of the current domestic plate is not very ergonomic.

Not necessarily mine, it's Stica, 600

I have used the Galaxy MC-2 base plate for many years, and I still know more about it. In fact, in the same five-wood structure baseplate, the Galaxy MC-2 is not soft, has a certain hardness, and feels good. It's not just the microcrystalline coating on the surface, it's the structure of the Stika Crystal Technology stiffener.

If the rubber configuration is scientific and reasonable, it can be a base plate that is suitable for playing with multiple stupid styles and has more comprehensive performance. I used the crossboard MC-2 to play fast arcs and double-sided fast attacks. Since the Stika S3000 is a six-layer structure of the baseplate, the board body is naturally thicker than the MC-2 baseplate, but this is not a reason why the S3000 is good and the MC-2 is bad, after all, the structure of five wood and six wood is different.

According to the golfers around me, the speed and power of the S3000 is average, and the speed S5000 is fast, but the performance S3000 is as comprehensive as the Galaxy MC-2, so it is representative in the Stika series.

I think,Each has its own merits,Just like the guy above said,S3000Relatively bullet,I won't say much about the rest,The guy on the wild side of Shangchang has finished the introduction,I'll directly say the conclusion,I think S3000Relative control is better,Zhi Xunxian always feels that MC2 is more handy in attacking and imitating attacks,S3000 is better in control and arc spin,So if it's control,I recommend S3000

MC-2 is a classic five-clamp pure wood structure, suitable for arc circles, because the board body is thin, so there is no bottom plate, so it is not suitable for Wang file Changhe to play fast attack. The S3000 is a quirky 6-layer stupid structure, with a carbon layer in the middle, a thick and stiff body, suitable for fast break and trapped arc circle play.

The Stica 3000 racket is better than the Galaxy MC-2 racket.

1. All MC-2 is a more famous fast-attacking arc ring baseplate in the Galaxy brand (in fact, many models of the Galaxy baseplate are imitation of imported brands, it can be said that there is still a certain gap between the performance and the imported baseplate, but MC-2 and T-2 and other models are more outstanding, cost-effective)....MC-2 and STIGA-OC are the same plywood structure, and the microcrystalline coating on the surface of the Galaxy MC series is very good, which hardens the board body and speeds up the ball speed, which to a certain extent makes up for the lack of pure OC in pushing and blocking. So that this fast base board has the speed of the fast attack board, but also does not lose the feel of 5 wooden boards....It is also lightweight, making it suitable for straight and horizontal shooting. The disadvantage is that the board body is thin, the bottom strength is slightly insufficient, and the large force has a shocking feel (the feel is acceptable)....In general, MC-2 is a well-done baseplate, a high-performance low-performance high-arc baseplate that you don't regret buying.

There's nothing more to say, it's all good. A classic racket from the galaxy.

Unless you're very skilled and have a lot of requirements for your racket. The general use is said to be easy to use.

Start, it is a little thinner than hole 5 wood, with Weilong + UFO, hard rubber, 166g

MC-2 - Fighter in a low-priced racket!

Cost-effective, balanced performance, strong fault tolerance, low threshold for pulling the ball arc ring plate is the first choice for beginners

It is also a recipe for a lot.

There's no problem.

People, smack.

fdth

Very cost-effective, generally enough to play, if the pure wood is recommended Stika. But then again, the feel difference is really subtle, it's just a feeling, the galaxy is enough.

The quality of the Galaxy's beats is relatively good, and the reputation is also good, the key is that many of its beats are imitations of several classic beats of imported brands.

If I want to recommend it, it is the Galaxy's MC-2 (imitating STIGA's OC), a cost-effective racket, and the suitable playing style is also relatively comprehensive.

It's okay, the domestic better baseplate, cost-effective, you must choose a good baseplate suitable for your own style of play, otherwise it will be very awkward, first to choose the right baseplate, and then to match the rubber and sponge.

It can be said that it is cheap and good. Relatively low ** to make a good quality baseboard! Among them, MC-2 and MC-5 are good, and online shopping** is quite cheap, below 130, it seems to be specifically checked.

The best domestic brands are Double Happiness and Galaxy, which are 2 categories, Athletic 2 and Athletic 3 are good bottom boards for Double Happiness, and they are not expensive! Butterflies, staga, and assaka are all good, but ** is relatively high! Novices are still going step by step, and there is no need to use it well at the beginning.

Because you can't play that level at all. When you reach a certain level, you can change the ** that suits you according to your own strength!

It's good, it's for professional players.

It can only be said that the selection of materials is the same, but compared with the calculation of stress in the finished product, there is a big difference in baking technology.

MC-2 This board feels good to use, the feel is good, the speed is also good, the surface of the board is still microcrystalline processing technology, the surface material is more popping ball faster, and effectively avoid the situation of filament when changing the rubber!

Good value for money, recommended to buy.

No, MC 2 has a supercrystalline coating on the surface, which makes the surface of the board feel hard, and if it is not easy to control with a hard sponge, the stamina of the arc ball cannot be reflected. OC is a 5-layer classic curved ring plate, which is soft and has enough stamina with hard sponge. Although the structure of the two boards is similar, the process is still very different in the treatment and selection of wood and the formula of glue.

The feeling is still very different.

MC-2 doesn't have as much of a ball to swallow as OC

The one-speed is slightly faster than the OC, and the two-speed is average.

The overall MC-2 feels good, and it's okay to eat the ball, not as good as others say. It's a pity that spruce is really poor due to the cost problem, and it is difficult to pick a good one, but the cost performance can be said to be the highest in the whole market.

Of course, if you want to advance to OC through MC-2, it's still very good, and the feel of MC-2 is very similar to the feel of many classic curved coil plates, which is quite suitable for players.

Push Stica, the characteristics are outstanding, the butterfly pays attention to the comprehensive, although expensive, but flashy, the same price of the bottom plate, Stika performance is superior! Stika Carbon Bottom Board Attack Sharp! The pure wood bottom plate of the butterfly is well defended! Pursue all-round with butterflies, and play fast with Stica.

Stica, the characteristics are outstanding, the butterfly focuses on comprehensiveness, it depends on your playing style and type, I personally like Stica, I am an offensive player, Stica carbon bottom board attack sharp, hehe

1. Performance. Butterflies have good workmanship, but they are slightly expensive, Stika has good performance, and Stika is more cost-effective than butterflies at the same price, but the workmanship is not as good as butterflies, and both have their own merits.

Second, the brand. Stika and Butterfly are both good, the butterfly bottom plate is generally better in terms of comprehensive performance, but it is also slightly more expensive, and the Stika bottom plate is more cost-effective at the same price. It depends on your personal style of play, after all, the right one is the best.

3. Types of play.

Choose the most suitable racket according to the type of play, different rackets are suitable for different types of play, choose a racket according to your favorite style of play, and decide whether to choose a butterfly racket or a Stika racket according to different playing styles.

Fourth, workmanship. Butterfly rackets are biased towards the workmanship of the racket, while Stika rackets are biased towards the performance of the racket, both have their own strengths.

Fifth, cost-effective.

Butterfly rackets are a bit inferior to Stica rackets in terms of performance and value for money.

I hope my answer helps you.