Is King Arthur related to the current British royal family?

King Arthur was the legendary leader of England. Everything about him is now impossible to verify. For example, how it was originally born, where it came from, and so on.

If there is a figure of King Arthur, it is presumed that he lived around 500 AD, during a period of about 50 years (according to the known versions of King Arthur). Therefore, his pedigree is even more unknown.

King Arthur was, of course, recognized by England, and was the great king of British history.

The most popular theory is that King Arthur was a Celtic, and that the ancestors of the English (excluding Scotland and Northern Ireland) were Anglo-Saxons, and the ancestors of the Romans were the ancient Romans, so Arthur was neither English nor Roman.

1 King Arthur did not exist in history, but only existed in myths and legends.

2 Legend has it that King Arthur was not an Englishman, but a Briton who had been exterminated by the British.

King Arthur was the legendary king of England in the 5th century。King Arthur is a legendary figure in the history of victory. Its story has been circulated among the people, and the legend about King Arthur has become more and more mysterious as time passes.

But no matter what, the role of King Arthur is a real occurrence in history. Stories come from life, but they can't be equated with life. We can't prove the truth of the story, but its source does exist.

We believe that these legends originated from the story of a true Celtic military leader who led the resistance against the Anglo-Saxons who landed in Britain between 400 and 600 years after the Gongwu. A historian, Nenius, wrote about him 300 years later, when the many storytellers had time to add to the truth.

Judging from the known sources, it is highly likely that King Arthur was a real historical figure, and he may have actually led the Celts on the island of Britain against Germanic invasions. But his true image may be far less magical and plump than in the legend. Regardless of the original existence of King Arthur, the now familiar King Arthur is a microcosm of British culture and ideals, and his meaning as a cultural symbol is far richer and more wonderful than that of real historical figures.

Camelot City is the legendary city of King Arthur, and the closest thing to Carmellot in history is Kedbury Castle. Today, there is only one hill standing in the middle of a valley. But archaeological excavations have shown that 1,500 years ago, Cadbury Castle was an important fortress and a good castle for kings.

The archaeological artifacts excavated at the castle also correspond to the date set for King Arthur by Neñoz, the author of the History of the Kings of Great Britain, in the fifth century. According to the legend of King Arthur, the hero Ambrosius Aureanhas led the Romanized British people against the Anglo-Saxon invaders in the fifth century. Arthur is a Roman name, and Ambrosius is likely to be one of the prototypes of King Arthur.

King Arthur's claim as a heroic figure as to whether or not it really existed is to put it bluntly into a debate between the hero-worshipping class and those who do not believe in heroismOf course, modern science has also been studying whether it really existed, as a historical figure, the influence on future generations belongs to his spirit, as long as his spirit exists, that is, it exists, it doesn't matter whether it really exists or not, but the recognition of his spirit by later generations I personally think.

King Arthur was a character from Celtic mythology, and there is no evidence that he actually existed. Characters related to King Arthur that are now circulatingThe story is mostly from ** "The Death of King Arthur". King Arthur was a Celtic, and the current British are mostly Anglo-Saxons.

Like the Emperor and Emperor Yan, the history has been passed down by word of mouth, and now there is no way to verify. What can be found now about King Arthur and Robin Hood,It's basically either a legend or a literary work. There are no relics for scholars to refer to.

So, it's not sure if it really exists.

Another view is that Arthur was a real person. Although certain theories suggest that he was a Roman, or pre-Roman figureBut according to most doctrines, and in keeping with a collection of traditional mythology, he was a Roman-British leader who lived in the late 5th and early 6th centuries AD against the Anglo-Saxon invaders.

The controversy over King Arthur is probably more intense today. Some insist that King Arthur was a real person in historyOthers think he's just a fictional character. Some consider King Arthur to be a Celtic hero, a petty king of western Britain who led an army against the Saxon invaders.

King Arthur is generally believed to have been the leader of the defeat of the Saxon army at the Battle of Mount Badon in 516 AD.

King Arthur, who is a household name in Britain, should have existed. After all, it is a household name, and whether it really exists or not, it is certain that there were similar figures in history.

Many people know the legend of King Arthur, but it is difficult for us to judge whether there is such a person or not, because there is no record.

Since it is a household name, of course, it is very likely to be real, but it is also possible to be like mythological characters such as Monkey King and Tang Sanzang in our country's Journey to the West, although they are household names, they are not real.

This can't actually be confirmed, because he really hasn't recorded it in the history books, so it remains to be proven whether he existed.

King Arthur, who is a household name in Britain, exists historically. It may be that there is no record in the annals of history. In circulation, he was rendered with magical colors.

King Arthur, which everyone knows in England, I feel that it is very likely that he existed, otherwise so many people would not have admired him.

It is uncertain whether King Arthur, a household name in Britain, exists, and many of the stories and characters that are household names may be real or made up.

Everyone in Britain knows King Arthur, and this King Arthur also existed for a real time, but we have enriched the story of this character.