Introduce the real King Arthur, don t exaggerate

Ordinary people, with strong leadership skills, will succeed in ten thousand bones.

It's a person who eats, drinks, and poops.

There may or may not be.

According to some schools, Arthur's historical prototype may have been that the Roman Empire commander in the province of Britannia (now known as the British Isles) lived in the late 5th and early 6th centuries AD against the Anglo-Saxon invasion of the British Isles. After that, his deeds were processed by literature and attached to mythology, eventually forming the legend of King Arthur as it is now known.

By the way, King Arthur did not have the title of "knight king", it was just the creation of a certain mushroom himself.

King Arthur is a legend, but not a historical reality (at least a large part of it is literary fiction). He is the legendary Celtic (Khan, not the team. They are the equivalent of the British Aboriginal kings and heroes.

Later, when the Celts resisted foreign invasions (I can't remember whether it was the Romans or later the Anglo-Saxon tribes), they were portrayed as heroes defending the nation and pinning their hopes of restoration. After entering the Middle Ages, it was given a model image of chivalric morality, showing the style of chivalry. Since then, literary and artistic works with the theme of King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table have been created, or a collection of folklore, and their literary and artistic connotations have been continuously expanded and enriched.

So King Arthur was not so much a historical figure as a cultural symbol.

Obviously, King Arthur originally corresponded to the early years of England, when the unified kingdom of England had not yet been established, and there was no later knightly system and chivalric morality. So those contents were given later).

Legends can be there or not, can not be verified, just like the Five Emperors, saying that he has, but he can't come up with evidence, saying that he doesn't have it, but there are many years of literature and word of mouth from the people.

No, it's a legendary figure.

King Arthur, the legendary king of Ancient Britain.

King Arthur is a recognized legendary figure, just like our Yellow Emperor, Emperor Yan.

There is no King Arthur in history.

King Arthur's full name is Arthur Pendragon, a figure from British legends, from Celtic myths and legends and medieval wild history documents, King Arthur is also the most popular knight leader of the Knights of the Round Table in the Celtic heroic spectrum, known as the Eternal King.

Medieval writers, especially French writers, have different accounts of the birth of King Arthur, the adventures of his knights, and the love of his knight, Sir Lancelot, and Arthur's queen Guinevere, which led the country to its destruction.

According to legend, after the collapse of the Roman Empire, he led the Knights of the Round Table to unify the British Isles, and was revered by later generations as King Arthur, a legendary story about King Arthur.

How it was originally born, where it came from, and the location of Camelot, the stage in which it was actually active, are very difficult to find out and have many debates. King Arthur appears in the early chaos of British history books.

There has also been a lot of controversy over the version, with some arguing that King Arthur may not be a specific historical figure, but rather a figure based on a number of legends.

There is no such person in history, and most of his legends come from the fantasy ** "The Death of King Arthur", although many people now claim that the prototype of King Arthur may be who and who, but they are all conjectures and have no real evidence. So King Arthur is like our Monkey King.

King Arthur was the most legendary king of England in the 5th century. People's emotional understanding of him comes more from myths and legends, no one has ever dabbled in the real life of King Arthur, he is like a mystery, waiting to be discovered and explored. But no hero can be without a trace.

King Arthur is the legendary king of England, the leader of the Knights of the Round Table, an almost mythical legend. After the collapse of the Roman Empire, he led the Knights of the Round Table to unify the British Isles, and was revered as King Arthur. Around 800 AD, the Welsh monks wrote a History of the Brintonians, in which the name "Arthur" was first recorded and described as leading the Welsh against the Saxons who invaded from the middle reaches of the Thames.

There should be such a person, but there are relatively few records, maybe not so great, some deeds should be rumors, and people deified him.

Let me add, for example, the story of Dayu's control of the water is a legend, and the five emperors of the ancients, the legend has to be the first person to write a story, and then he told the story to others or wrote it into a book to pass it down, and then there are batches of communicators, that's it.

Arthur is generally considered to be Artorius, the king of the bears of Artorigios (Dubear-King). Zhi meaning in Old Welsh and Aidao Erlan. Some believe that this is also the Greek language and kai.

The Ltic language contains a word in the connection. It is thought that Arthur was probably based on a Roman-Briton chieftain who lived in the area from Cornwall to Wales and helped the Romans resist the Saxon invasion. Until the withdrawal of the Roman army.

It was probably around the fifth century. Now the image of King Arthur begins with Geoffrey's "History of the Kings of Britain" by Geoffrey, the old monk Monmouth.

No! It's just a legend!