Whether fate is in the hands of the individual or the social debate competition, please 3Q

The fate of the individual is in the hands of the individual. First of all, we should understand what is fate? According to the authoritative interpretation of the Modern Chinese Dictionary, fate is the living conditions of a person's life, usually referring to the so-called good fortune and misfortune, high and low, and the overall situation of life.

People are individuals in society, cells that make up society, and their source power lies in themselves, not others. If you are a persistent and determined person, then you will move forward according to your own way of thinking, so that success belongs to you. Society will only give you opportunities, and it is up to you whether to grasp the opportunities or not.

As the old saying goes, there is no pie in the sky. If you want to eat pie, you have to rely on your own hands to try to win it.

Throughout history, modern times, China and foreign countries, there are indeed some people who have handed over the power to control their own destiny to God and to God. However, when people take back the control of their destiny through struggle, they find that they can control their own destiny. Therefore, generation after generation of people who have become more and more aware have been unremittingly playing the symphony of destiny of self-reliance, unyielding and resistance.

As far back as ancient China, Confucius advocated "knowing fate" and denied the agnosticism of fate. Mozi advocated "non-fate" and opposed the so-called "fate". During the Ming and Qing dynasties, Wang Fuzhi proposed "making life", believing that as long as people understand and follow the inevitability of things, they can control their fate.

The results of modern scientific research have shown that human beings are the most advanced and spiritual beings among all known beings in the universe at present, and as the so-called "nature of heaven and earth, man is precious", there is no god or other thing that dominates the fate of mankind. For the first time, Marxism scientifically explained that "the essence of man is the real social ties of man," which is determined by the sum total of various social relations that exist in reality. And the fate of man is the basic state of man in the process of dealing with various relations with the objective world.

In the same social environment, the reason why people's destinies are very different is mainly caused by a series of differences in objective and subjective conditions. Among them, the internal cause, that is, the subjective condition, is the basis for the change of human destiny and is decisive, and the external cause plays a role through the internal cause. Therefore, whether it is the practice of human development or the analysis of scientific theories, the final conclusion is one sentence:

The fate of the individual is largely in the hands of the individual. Knowing that your destiny is in your own hands is the premise of correctly grasping your destiny.

Society provides opportunities to change fate, and individuals show the ability to seize opportunities, if you have this ability, then your fate will change, if you don't have this ability, then it will be another person who will change your fate.

The fate of the individual is in the hands of the individual, and the three debates of the debate competition are the positive side, and the questions that should be asked are:In a person's life, whether it is studying or working, he has to make his own efforts, if a person does not want to study and does not want to work. It's not something that others can control, everything else is just passing by in front of the individual.

Doesn't this mean that there is a person in charge of fate?

Of course, it is not enough to rely on these arguments in our favor, because the other side will also attack us with arguments that are unfavorable to our side. Therefore, as a third debate, the more important point is to learn to catch the opponent's loopholes on the spot. And these leaky void holes are the auxiliary internal drafts of your "attack".

Note to the third debate: When preparing for a debate, you must be clear about two things: which arguments are dominant in the debate; Which ones are not advantageous to us.

Which of these arguments about our superiority are the most convincing and to the point.

I'm a debater, so do you have any manuscripts that I can refer to?

I'm square, and I'm going to ask questions.

Summary. Hello <>

Expand your information <>

Debate is to use certain reasons to explain each other's opinions on things or problems, and expose each other's contradictions, so as to get a common understanding and opinion in the end; Debate (competition) aims to develop people's thinking skills. In the form of a debate competition, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, but in fact, it is a competition of related knowledge, a competition of thinking and reaction ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability. The core vocabulary of the debate competition is one"Debate"Words, just like this debate, the middle one"words", one on each side"Sim"The debaters on both sides are evenly matched, each side has its own arguments and arguments, and the views of both sides cannot be completely subjective to judge who is right and who is wrong.

After the competition, the judges will score according to the scoring criteria of the debate competition and determine the <> of victory or defeat

A debate competition: Is destiny in the hands of the individual or society? Our point of view is in the hands of the individual, and the question that asks the other person's point of view is sought to refute it. Hurry, bye.

Hello <>

We're happy to answer your <>

A debate competition: Is destiny in the hands of the individual or society? The point of the Qiaomo view of filial piety is mastered by the individual, and the question of refuting and asking the other party's point of view is that if the fate of the person is determined by society, then why should we struggle<>

Hello <>

Expand your information <>

Debate is to use certain reasons to explain each other's opinions on things or problems, and expose each other's contradictions, so as to get a common understanding and opinion in the end; Debate (competition) aims to develop people's thinking skills. In the form of a debate competition, it is a kind of competition in which the two parties debate on a certain issue, and in fact, it is a kind of liquid competition of relevant knowledge, a competition of thinking and reaction ability, a competition of language expression ability, and a competition of comprehensive ability around the problem of debate. The core vocabulary of the debate competition is one"Debate"Words, just like this debate, the middle one"words", one on each side"Sim"The debaters on both sides are evenly matched, each side has its own arguments and arguments, and the views of both sides cannot completely subjectively judge who is right and who is wrong.

After the competition, the judges will score according to the scoring criteria of the debate competition and determine the <> of victory or defeat

Summary. Teach us that "man will conquer heaven". The external environment can affect a person's success, but the internal cause is the key and the determining force, (haven't you heard that the children of the poor are in charge of the family early?)

Man's destiny is in his own hands. Stephen Hawking, Beethoven, Helen. Keller, Gorky, Ostrovsky, ......Didn't these people use their lives to prove the proposition that fate is in their own hands!

A debate competition: Is destiny in the hands of the individual or society? Our point of view is in the hands of the individual, and the question that asks the other person's point of view is sought to refute it. Hurry, bye.

Teach us that "man will conquer heaven". The external environment can affect a person's book of respect, but the internal factor is the key and the determining power, (haven't you heard that the children of the poor are in charge of the family early?) Man's destiny is in his own hands.

Stephen Hawking, Beethoven, Helen. Keller, Gorky, Ostrovsky, ......Aren't these people using their lives to prove the proposition that fate is wide and the fortune is in their own hands!

Try to make it more difficult for the opposite side, and you can be tricky, thank you.

Everyone comes into the world with a so-called question of fate. People who believe in superstition and blind fortune-telling all believe: "Man's fate is destined by heaven, and it is useless to think wildly."

From a scientific point of view, fate is not predetermined at all, nor is it unchangeable. To control one's own destiny, we must rely on ourselves and rely on our own efforts to struggle.

Oh, yes! Society is the rules of the game for the individual to provide a loss for life, and the individual is subject to social constraints, but everyone's success is never determined by the rules! You said that Mr. Lincoln was born in China and could not be a **, but he could be a ** in the United States, so why did the tens of millions of people living in the United States end up only producing Lincoln**?

Why didn't General Grant become a general? Why didn't other Americans make it? Please!

Can you give a little bit about the arguments and the questions about the offensive and defensive links?

Thank you, thank you, urgently.

From those posted above.

It's enough to make the other party unable to refute it.

Thank you, thank you, I found two questions, enough for me to ask each other, thank you very much.

Find out in the ones you posted above.

Against: The fate of the individual is in the hands of society and the debate is exemplified as follows:

There are four main aspects in which the fate of an individual is in the hands of society:

First, the realization of an individual's destiny is provided by society. A person's fate is largely influenced by their surroundings.

Compared with poor areas, students can study seriously without being disturbed by the outside world, because the school provides resources such as teaching buildings, dormitories, and teachers. I was able to get into university because society has a college entrance examination system. Therefore, no matter how the development of an individual's destiny may be, it cannot be separated from the society in which he or she lives.

Second: the direction of the development of an individual's destiny is in the hands of society. In China during the Cultural Revolution, whether you want it or not, you will be drawn into this entangled political struggle of the whole people.

At this time, working hard to start a business by yourself is undoubtedly self-defeating. The ten-year Cultural Revolution has subverted the fate of many Chinese people and annihilated many talents.

Thirdly, the development of the individual's destiny is judged by society. In ancient times, military service was compulsory, and every household sent troops according to the number of soldiers, and it was also mandatory to recruit strong men to replenish the army.

People think it's bad to be a soldier. In addition to being voluntary, modern soldiers must also meet certain age, height, education level and other conditions.

Fourth, individual choices should follow the laws of society. For example, during the Great Leap Forward, people violated social laws by putting forward unrealistic goals of "high-yield satellites" and "how bold the people are, how productive the land is," and one-sidedly pursuing the high speed of industrial and agricultural production and construction, disrupting the order of the national economy, wasting a lot of manpower and material resources, and causing a serious imbalance in the proportion of industry and agriculture.

To sum up, we insist that the fate of the individual is in the hands of society. ”

The fate of the individual is in the hands of the individual with arguments:

Recognizing that one's destiny is in one's own hands is the premise for correctly grasping one's own destiny, which is of great significance to human emancipation and social development. Over the past 50 years since the founding of the People's Republic of China, and especially in the past 20 years since reform and opening up, China has made tremendous achievements in economic and social development, greatly improved the people's living standards, and undergone major changes in their mental outlook. All this is the result of the Chinese people grasping their own destiny.

Half of an individual's destiny is in the hands of society, and generally in their own hands. Therefore, neither party alone can decide your own fate. There are also examples of emphasizing individual effort, such as Chen Jingrun's middle school math in a small shop, which was eventually cleared by the head of the mathematics department at Tsinghua University.

Albert Einstein also said, "Regardless of the social environment, a person can always eliminate influences and go his own way".

Debate Pro: The fate of the individual is in the hands of the individual Negative: The fate of the individual is in the hands of society.

Personally, I feel that we human beings are changing our own destiny in the general environment, rather than puppets operating under the social machine, our thoughts determine our circumstances, thus affecting our lives, and the trillions of our society provide the objects of our encounters, under the influence of thoughts, we choose to face the society, rather than the puppet-like source of fate. (It is recommended that the landlord first express the rhetorical questions raised by the other party in this view, and point out the shortcomings, so as to achieve the goal for his own use, so that the other party is speechless.) For example:

Wu Zetian's thoughts determined the circumstances of her life, so that the society at that time recognized her as the emperor of the woman's body, her fate broke the unspoken rules of society before the Tang Dynasty, it was not to give in, it was a manifestation of self-control, Wu Zetian's fate was a challenge to the society at that time, and vetoed the recognition and control of the society at that time. ）