-
Of course, you can, but you have to retreat far away, and in reality it is not suitable, in short, you are not competent.
You should use a wide-angle lens, a lens with an equivalent focal length of 35mm or less, and since the D300 is in APS-C format, then a lens with an actual focal length of 24mm or less is recommended.
It was a portrait, and a group photo of more than 200 people certainly did not fall into the category of portraits.
Good luck.
-
When it comes to shooting, the ability to shoot depends on the magnification size of the group photo**. Specifically, the D300 has 12.3 million effective pixels, and if it is output with an accuracy of 200 dpi, it can output a size of 54 cm x 36 cm**. If the output size is smaller than the above size, then this set of equipment is competent.
If you're going to output a larger format, you'll need to choose a camera with higher effective pixels.
In terms of lenses, the 50mm is a good choice, with excellent distortion control and high resolution, making it ideal for group shots. Try to shoot with a small aperture when shooting, and shoot directly with the best aperture of the lens on the premise of satisfying the depth of field. If you're limited in space, consider a fixed-focus wide-angle lens.
-
The answer is accurate and incompetent.
Group photos, because people are divided into rows, several rows before and after, and a large depth of field is required, so the large aperture of your fixed focus is equivalent to invalidation.
50mm plus the factor of the C format is the mid-focal length, which is too far from the wide angle, the angle is narrow, and you can't take it in, and if you want to shoot, you have to step back very far.
Because the group photo does not require much effect, you can use a set of lenses to be better than this.
To put it simply, to have a wide angle of 200 people, consider 10 18mm, more than 18mm, you have a hard time doing.
Aperture 8 11 or even smaller than 8 will not work.
-
It is better to use a zoom head and a tripod (a scale gimbal) to stitch together, because it requires a large depth of field; In addition, the wide-angle lens is not very suitable, and the disadvantage is that the corners are deformed, unless it is ultra-wide, and then cropped.
-
1. Taking a group photo of 200 people is generally done by shaking the head and splicing, it is recommended that you check the relevant information.
2. In general, in this case, a lens with small distortion is selected, which is 50% satisfied.
3. In actual use, 50 should be too long, and you have to retreat very back, which is very inconvenient. On the other hand, the background is easy to shoot incompletely, so it is not recommended.
4. You can consider finding a place to experiment so as not to be embarrassed at work.
-
The so-called portrait lens, the effect of the illumination is not the shallowest depth of field, the key point is that the aperture is large, which can ensure sufficient light intake, so as to make people bright.
These lenses with different focal lengths have different positioning, belonging to standard portraits, with a constant large aperture, soft colors, and fast capture speed; 55-200, which belongs to the medium telephoto, can take into account portraits and telephotos, but the aperture is small; 70-300 belongs to the telefocus head, a sharp weapon for birds. The effect of these photos is 70-300, and you can get a good bokeh effect with the telefocus end, but the premise is that you are at least twice as far away from the subject, basically you can't use it in the house, hehe.
So, to sum up, if you are dedicated to portraits, then don't hesitate to choose.
A little advice and good luck!
-
Shooting portraits is of course AF-S 50mm F !!
**About 1500 yuan!!
-
50 bar, D3100 doesn't have a fuselage motor, so don't buy 50.
-
I gave up buying 55-300 and planned to buy 18-105. Don't know how this is? When shooting portraits, you can shoot an illusory body without a motor, and you should choose a 35mm prime lens for portraits, because it is a large-aperture prime lens.
In terms of the performance of the machine, it must be D300 good, otherwise people can ask you for 3000 yuan more. After all, they are positioned as quasi-professional-grade SLR cameras. The question is how useful those professional performance is for you, and whether you need it, which is important. >>>More
D90 Nikon's Toys I don't want to buy it.
The D300 is a good machine. However, the recent ** rebound! However, if it rises, it will rise by 200 oceans, don't buy the head of a dead horse, and the coke is serious, so it is not as good as a dragon >>>More
The 320ti should be high-end for amateurs, with more than 800. Victor pulsation. >>>More
D7000 body listed in North America**1199, about 8000, about 1000 cheaper than D300S, considering that in addition to the focusing system, other hardware indicators are not lower than D300S, I personally think it is still worth buying. However, D7000 is indeed too close to D300S, it is estimated that Nikon will soon release a follow-up model of D300S, and the follow-up model positioning will be higher than D300S, it may be close to Canon7D's top APS SLR, then**It will be higher. If you start in the near future, the D300S is also good, if you can wait for a while, just wait for the D7000** to stabilize.
Nikon D3200 DSLR Camera Pros:1.**Dramatically improved pixels; >>>More