I ve always wanted to buy DSLR cameras, I ve been following the D7000 and D90 for a long time, who s

D90 is a machine released in 2008,At that time, it was the best model of this level,God machine level,Although it has lagged behind the new model in terms of parameters now,But the film effect is still of high quality,And ** is similar to the entry machine,About 5000 yuan,It is an economical and practical model。

D7000 is an upgraded version of D90, not only in terms of parameters are better than D90, but also in the internal hardware configuration can be said to be a grade, and the film effect is also quite good, ** about 2000 yuan higher than D90, about 7000 yuan.

If I personally choose it is possible to choose the D7000 later, because in the late parameters are still the main factor.

The D90 is indeed too old, and the pixels are a little lower, but of course, there is no problem with using it.

D7000 D7100 It is more appropriate to consider these two models. This is the flagship model of Nikon APS-C format, and the overall performance is much higher than that of the D90, which is worth considering.

D7000 is an upgraded version of D90 If the budget is OK, the fruit segment D7000 Ah, in addition, now D7100 is out, why not buy D7100 Buy digital products There is a saying that buy new not buy old.

The D7000 is a full upgrade of the D90, not almost all of the D90.

Pixels, weight, alloy body, processor, dual SD card slots, continuous shooting speed, camera function, focus point.

All the hardware and software on the D90 have been upgraded to one stop, except that the display screen has maintained 920,000 pigments and the shoulder screen has not changed much.

However, it is also equivalent to D90 when it was introduced two years ago**, and I personally think it is slightly higher. But it's almost fair to say that the DX level does this.

It's perfect.

Digital machines are of course newer and much better than they were a few years ago! It is recommended that you buy D7000!

Personally, I suggest that if you are not bad money, of course, you should first choose D7000, if you are bad money, then D90, they are about the same, for beginners, D90 and D7000 are no different for you.

Don't dwell on it, if it's the two winning choices must be D7000.

are all good choices, and the new ones are still D7000.

D90 has been on the market for too long, which does not meet the requirements of buying new electronic products and not buying old ones.

The D7000** falls more slowly.

The 60D is not a metal case, and it feels worse in the hand. Flipping the screen is still quite easy to use in some cases.

7D is the flagship, metal case. But the quality of the photos is honestly no better than 60d.

There is money on 7d. Set of ** in the early 1w2 bar.

The most cost-effective is called 600d, and 7d is a quick capture, which is generally not used. D7000 is best, but **too high. The D90 is now the lowest price.

The 7D 17 40 4L is more high-end.

The mid-range is optional D90 + 16 85 VR

The D7000 is too cost-effective to be on the D300S.

Why not the D300s? Nikon's mid-range machine is the same grade as 7D, but I personally think that all aspects of performance should be killed in seconds7D

I'll give you an analysis one by one, some time ago I was also a friend who wanted to buy a SLR, and I hesitated for a long time in these four machines.

First of all, although these four are mid-range machines, the grades are still different. D90 D7000 60D is a grade, 7D is the flagship in C APS-C, it corresponds to Nikon D300S.

According to the ratio of advantages and disadvantages, it should be 7d>d7000>60d>d90 (but I personally think that D90 is better than 60D, because of the principle of buying new electronic products and not buying old ones, so D90 is put last).

Among them, the least recommended to buy is D7000, because of its current **, too much moisture, not enough cost performance, and now the single machine is about 7K5. But the performance is still much better.

The appearance of D7000 is against 60D, and the cost performance of 60D is fully reflected, **It's not kind, I won't say anything bad about it, I think it's a bit like a toy. If you don't have much to ask for a machine, it's enough to buy it.

Speaking of D90, I think that if you buy a machine, the key is to see what you need, and the machine you buy is "enough" is the best. If you are a newbie, we recommend D90, because all its features are enough for you and can be used for a long time. If you have a machine that wants to upgrade your equipment in a big way, and you want to play photography well, save some money and get it all up.

If it's the former, D90 is the most recommended.

By the way, 7D, the seventh brother is the same as the 300s, it is the flagship in APS-C, not to mention the performance of the machine, absolutely good. Many people will say, "I have bought 7D D300, why don't you just go to the full pair", I think the people who say this are very stupid, to have money, who doesn't know to go on the full pair? Do you still need to remind me?

So if you have limited funds and have certain requirements for the fuselage, the 7D D300S will not disappoint you.

I didn't say anything about the performance of each machine, not because I'm lazy, but because if I want to say something, you will continue to struggle for a long time because "this machine has this advantage, that machine has that advantage". I'll just say a word, at the current level, the machine will not be very bad, the advantages will not be too obvious, each machine has its own unique place, buy it in your hands will gain a lot, a lot of surprises, and can grope for a long time, with a big few years or something no pressure.

That's my opinion, it's just that seeing your question reminds me of my friend who has been struggling for half a year, and everything is from my heart, I hope it helps.

To add: I myself use Nikon's D300S

I wish you all the best in your purchase!

7D bar Friends use the feeling is OK.