I should buy a DSLR camera, professionals, please help

Photographing scenery and flowers and plants, you can't achieve the effect you are satisfied with, and I don't know what the effect is that you are satisfied with.

Is the scenery not broad enough, or the background of the flowers and plants not blurred enough?

To put it simply, most of the scenery needs a wide angle, and most of the flowers and plants need a macro.

If you buy a DSLR camera, you need to take into account both the wide-angle lens and the macro lens to be better.

Express your **.

Understand your own real needs, so that you can deal with the symptoms.

I think you might just need a Canon G9 instead of a DSLR.

You can message me what you are not satisfied with and I hope I can continue to help you choose.

Make a good machine that meets your wishes!

I just need some SLR cameras with a large aperture and good image quality. "DSLR cameras are lensless, and the 450d Canon is mainly aimed at beginner and entry-level consumers.

The machine can be described as entry-level"The Emperor"

The D300 is relatively professional, a mid-to-high-end machine, and a standby machine for the D3. Of course, it is also more than 10,000 yuan.

I guess if you're just patting and playing.

But with a DSLR camera.

I think the 450d is a modest choice.

Lens: You want a lens with a large aperture and only a constant aperture, which is 10,000 yuan.

So you buy a 450d head, and that head is pretty good.

The 450D is the entry-level SLR, and the low-level SLR is either in performance or lacking in function.

If you think 450d is expensive, you can buy 400d, which is cheaper.

The weight of the camera is directly proportional to the image quality.

If you must have a DSLR, then 1) the Canon 550D comes with an 18 200 zoom lens. The imaging is mediocre, but the weight is light. The other three models are mainly focused on the strong focusing function, especially the 2 and 3

In terms of imaging, the 3 has the best imaging, but the focal length is the shortest, and there are few things that can be photographed.

Since you mainly collect materials, you can not use a DSLR, can you consider the Leica LUX3, LUX4 or Panasonic LX3, LX4? Light weight, good imaging, good color. When shooting landscapes, there are not many requirements for focusing performance.

If you don't learn technology with a DSLR, you might as well use a digital camera.

In addition, in terms of color, it is mainly the late stage. SLR shooting generally requires the original flavor, and the color depends on the post-production.

When shooting landscapes, you must have a tripod, and stabilization is not the main thing, because shooting landscapes requires a small aperture. Mainly play on a tripod. Stabilization only prevents you from shaking, not from the subject.

I think Laika and Panasonic are the best fit for you.

If the budget allows, it's still 7D, the weight is actually not much heavier, and it is usually hung around the neck or on the shoulder, and girls are stronger than boys in this regard (women often carry big bags when they go out. In the future, there will be silver, and then with a 50mm fixed focus and a 70-200 is a perfect combination, you can also buy not 70-200 but into a 24-105 are a good match, if you upgrade to full frame in the future, these lenses are still the same easy to use, 7D this combination, the image quality is the best in these configurations.

As for stabilization, most cameras now have stabilization in the lens, which is also relatively efficient.

I'm a Canon user, so I'd like to have a comment on Canon:

550 with 18-200 to post-process Can you consider changing the lens, 7D is too heavy and not suitable for girls The lens can.

For your reference!

D90, and, 550 These two should not be bad, Nikon's body is slightly smaller, and it will feel more comfortable for girls. As for the price, the two are not much different... It's still up to you to see which one you prefer.

Basic Target Range:

1. It can be truly completely manually controlled (reflecting the creative idea, precise control ** and color) 2, the CCD is as large as possible (noise improvement, low illumination improvement) 3, when the zoom range of the lens is sufficient, it is better to be small (the lens with a small range is easy to do well, which can improve the imaging quality and distortion).

4, there is optical image stabilization function (high ISO and electronic methods for image stabilization, will lose image quality) 5, study, home travel, the effect of the wide-angle lens can not be less (the number of equivalent focal lengths is less than 30) G11 is good, if this grade is too expensive, the model I know at present has Fuji more suitable:

1, Fujifilm F200 EXR2, Fujifilm F85 EXR3, Fujifilm F75EXR

As long as your pocket allows, the LX3 is definitely the king of small cameras, and the imaging quality is closest to the DSLR effect.

G11 is average in price. SX120 don't think about it.