Is the super line strong or the dual core strong, please everyone, thank you

In layman's terms, the role of hyper-threading is to make the single-core CPU use as a dual-core without full load, which can greatly use the free resources of the CPU. Those CPUs that claim to have dual cores and four cores have hyper-threading. To put it simply, when the CPU is running a large program, most of its resources will be invested in this program, and when you run another program, his part of the idle resources will not be well invested in the new program due to the lack of reasonable control, but will cause two programs to compete for computing resources conflict, so the original single-core computer double-open will be very stuck, and the dual-core computer can easily double-open, one kernel to operate a main program.

Hyper-threading is like this, there is no difference when a single-core CPU runs a program, when running two programs, hyper-threading technology makes the CPU with hyper-thread make its idle resources independent through reasonable allocation and control, and calculate new programs separately, just like dual-core, but if it runs a program, there are no idle resources under full load, then hyper-threading is meaningless. For today's home personal computers, hyperline doesn't make much sense, because now computers are basically dual-core or above, and home users generally don't run more than two large programs at the same time, and dual-core CPUs are easier to deal with, so there is no need to pursue CPUs with hyper-threading (HT) technology, now you understand.

Hyper-threading, generally CPUs are dual, hyper-threading is less.

Dual-core is stronger than single-core hyper-threading.

Dual-core No matter how much a car is modified, there are not as many things as two cars. The most critical time. Hyper-threading technology is not supported by many software at all.

1 All of them are two physical cores, but two virtual cores are created.

It is said to be quad-core, but in fact, two of the cores are virtual. So just in terms of the number of core applications, it is slightly worse than the real four quad-core CPUs that are all physical cores.

Your statement should be wrong, it should be dual-core and four-threaded.

Dual-core four-wire refers to the integration of two processing cores in the CPU, each core can execute two threads at the same time, but in fact, the CPU has only one ALU, no matter how good the design is, it can't make up for the natural shortcomings, and the pipeline technology can't solve the empty waiting generated by jump instructions very well, so it is still necessary to optimize the program.

To put it simply, it's like two motors and four oil pipes.

Four-thread allows the processor to transfer data fast enough under heavy load! Many processors can be overclocked, and overclocking is like a motorcycle with 40 horsepower but 45 horsepower, then there must be plenty of gasoline!

So: there is not much difference between a dual-core four-thread processor and an ordinary dual-core processor during the first load, but the advantage of the four-thread is reflected in the high load!

You hit it by hand completely, and please adopt it by all means!

Here's an example:

The core is equivalent to the road, the dual core is 2 3-meter roads, the 4-core is 4 3-meter roads, the dual-core and the four threads are two roads, and 2 lines are drawn in the middle, divided into 4 roads, of course, for the meter car, you can run 4 cars side by side at a time (the original 2 roads that are not divided into 3 meters can only drive 2 cars), but the 3-meter car is only 2 cars.

But 4 cores can run 4 big cars.

That is to say, 4 threads work when processing small parallel data, and multi-threading does not have the same processing power as real 4 cores for large parallel data.

This means that the CPU can handle 4 tasks at the same time.

There are many good schools and majors, but there are no good places, you can fill in the places that are slightly worse, such as Northeastern University and Chang'an University, which are all first-class key universities, and they are quite strong in cultivating comprehensive quality and ability. Although we have a good place in Zhejiang, except for Zhejiang University, they are all second-rate key universities. If you don't care so much about place, you can think about it.

Of course, it's not good that the northwest is too remote.

You can apply to Zhejiang A&F University, Wenzhou University or University of Nottingham Ningbo China (tuition is expensive).

Or report to Zhejiang Ocean University and Jiaxing College, which have just been approved to recruit one this year.

There is no problem with 30 points into 211 over the key line, and there are more than 985 numbers, as long as the grade is slightly lower than Tsinghua University and Peking University.

The name of economics is good, but what it learns is only economic theory, what microeconomics, macroeconomics, socialist economy and the like, employment is not very good, think twice. School, I think to study economics to go to the University of Finance and Economics, Nancai, Shancai, Tiancai are all good choices.

Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, ** University of Finance and Economics, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, are all good....