May I ask which of the cars between 13 and 15W is better MT and not AT

I'm also thinking about buying a car that is fuel-efficient, economical and cost-effective. I've been researching for a long time, and there are a few of them. Hope it helps.

Honda Civic: **Around 160,000. The exterior and interior are great.

Relatively fuel-efficient. But the motivation is not good. I've driven this car.

There is a serious lack of motivation. Volkswagen's new Bora: I didn't study it because I didn't think it looked good.

Volkswagen's Octavia: New technology. The price is reasonable.

German car ***. But the appearance is too mediocre. And the interior is ugly.

Toyota Corolla: The car is a good car. But the appearance is not too good-looking.

The chassis is high. And this car doesn't have full power. , the price is on the high side.

The interior of the Ford Focus 2-box: 09 version is a new highlight. The handling is also better.

But oyster sauce. **Cheap. Roewe 550 and 750:

This car is good. Atmosphere. But too high.

And the power is not too good, suitable for middle-aged people. High maintenance and repair costs. Mazda 3:

I've always liked the look of the car, it's fuel-efficient. The power is very good, but it is a Japanese car, and the wagon is relatively thinAlthough Volkswagen's cars are also very good, Volkswagen's interiors are always like this, mediocre.

,.. not up the gradeThe appearance is unsightly. And the fuel consumption is relatively high.

Maintenance is also not cheap,Other cars don't have to be considered at all. At this price, only these cars are cost-effective.

I suggest you consider in Fox and Horse 3 and.

Remember.

22 years old, the first choice 2 boxes Focus MT is now 11W, plus taxes and licensing fees, can be controlled within the landlord's budget Secondly, 2 boxes 307, 2 boxes after the pure French blood, but there are two problems, 1 is the engine is not all-aluminum, 2 is ** discount is relatively small I don't like to use Yuedong, Yuedong changed the new chassis after the facelift, the wheelbase is larger, the configuration and workmanship of the interior I think at least, 2, 3 grades, the lines of the entire body will not be very abrupt, and** Very kind. As for the Civic and M3 that were sold in the previous paragraph, not to mention, the thin skin and light car will save oil, and the interior is excellent, but the appearance has been seriously aesthetically fatigued.

If you like to fly a car and experience the fun of driving, you should buy MT, after all, if you don't have AT, it's not good for cornering, and it's more expensive than MT for 10,000 yuan!

MT Ahh It's fun to drive, it's fuel-efficient, and the gearbox generally doesn't break easily.

MT so that you dare to call a driver when driving, and the cars that drive automatic transmissions are all women.

Of course, AT is definitely a symbol of high-end cars, but if you like drag racing, it is better to choose a manual transmission.

The pursuit of driving pleasure on the MT

If you pursue comfort, you will be at

Of course, you have to buy MT to save fuel, AT is very fuel-efficient!

It depends on where you drive, if it is the main urban area, there are more vehicles, it is easy to get stuck in traffic, and it is good to run at the highway, if it is a border city, the traffic flow is less, and it is good to run less high-speed MT.

If you like a car, then buy a Focus hatchback, it's definitely enough for you, I dare to say that buying this car at this price is definitely the first choice.

mt because I also drive mt feels good Divide it among me, hehe, I didn't eat and sent you a message.

MT, of course! Because the first gear is obvious! Of course, it's a quick start! Of course! Some good AT cars are also good! But MT and AT of the same brand start much faster!

AT is easy to use. Especially driving on the snail-like roads of the city, constantly starting, stopping, you will start to envy the person who drives the AT, except, of course, masochism. If you are not a professional racing driver (people drive an AT with MT, which is too high-end), driving is just a substitute, and you are not a full-time driver (driving a taxi), it is better to buy an AT.

Although it is more expensive, it is convenient and easy to operate.

Fuel consumption AT is generally slightly higher than MT. This is for the real driving master who has a good habit of driving MT, if you have bad driving habits and the action is not in place, driving AT will be more fuel-efficient than MT.

The technology is becoming more and more advanced, and this slightly higher fuel consumption will be basically the same sooner or later.

Think about it the other way, the AT of any car is definitely about 10,000 more expensive than the MT with the same configuration, if there is no benefit, which fool is willing to pay more money?

at,mt

Pros: AT is easy to drive, especially when you are stuck in traffic.

MT is fuel-efficient but cumbersome.

Disadvantages: AT costs oil, and everything is more expensive than MT's.

AT is simple to drive and easy to learn, but it is more fuel-intensive, and it is not as enjoyable to drive as MT, and it is also more expensive.

MT is cumbersome to learn, requires high driving skills, but is fuel-efficient.

But the AT car seems to be less fun to drive, and my personal opinion is that it is better to drive an MT car, which is to save money and drive comfortably.

A few people upstairs talked a lot.

However, there is a problem, if the technology is not good and the operation is improper, the clutch of the MT will be sharpened faster, and the cost may not be saved.

The various costs of the AT are high, and the driving is comfortable and convenient, which is suitable for being in a busy city.

The various fees of MT are relatively low, and the operation is more cumbersome, which is suitable for cities that are not busy.

What are the pros and cons of CVT, AT and dual-clutch transmissions? Which is better?

AT's car is less fun than driving!

It's like driving a bumper car in a children's park!

AT is an automatic transmission and MT is a manual transmission.

t is turbocharged, such as Volvo S40, Passat and so on.

ST I don't know where you see each car represents a different meaning.

The MT is a manual transmission, the FSI is a gasoline vehicle, and the TDI is a diesel vehicle.

AT is automatic.

MT is a manual transmission.

MT: It is manual transmission, AT is automatic.

Lavida's power and fuel consumption are lower and better, the suspension is moderate, and the interior of the Sylphy is spacious, and the suspension is soft, which is not suitable for intense driving. Maintenance costs are estimated to be similar.

Dizzy. Automatic transmission.

Manual transmission.