The more money a person has, the greater his responsibility to society. I think so. Do you agree?

I think people with more knowledge have a great responsibility to the society, the development of society depends not only on the economy, but also on the quality of culture and nationality, the ideal state is how much wealth you have at least how much corresponding thinking and quality, that is, you have to have the ability to control your money reasonably, not money to manipulate you, otherwise more money is not necessarily a good thing for the society.

No, everyone is born with his own responsibility, and the more he gets, the greater the responsibility, but does what he gets have to be measured in money? A person, how much happiness he thinks he has gotten, how much happiness he has, then he has to give.

There is a little truth, but it is not entirely true, the more powerful the person, the greater the responsibility to society, which is more correct.

When you have a lot of money, you don't care about money, but reflect your value, and you will want to do your best to do some public welfare, I think so.

In the case of an absolutely free economy, this topic is not established, there is almost no force to restrain them, although the philanthropy in Europe and the United States is relatively developed, but they are by no means sincere, and doing charity is only a disguised advertisement, and the money they take out to do charity is not proportional to the profits they make, of course, there are a few exceptions.

Wrong. Because the hearts of rich people are not necessarily kind.

Agree, you and I agree.

But do the rich agree?

About 10,000 a year is still a relatively low standard, and it must be paid for 15 years.

It's like seven or eight thousand dollars a year, and then you calculate how much it costs?

The minimum contribution is 15 years, if you have not paid a pension before and are not ready to pay in the future, there is no point in paying this money.

It depends, have you paid it before?

Money is not omnipotent, the more you value money, it may cause irreparable mistakes, the gentleman loves money and takes it in a good way, otherwise this money can not be sustained, and the second money is traced back to the source does not belong to you, but it is temporarily stored in you, and sooner or later it will be returned, and the money is not in a hurry, the more urgent the more you can't get it, and you can't reach it quickly.

There are many divorces, but not all of them are caused by money.

That can't be said, who doesn't look at the money? Don't you need money to live? It's okay if you don't have money, but you have to work hard! At least there's some hope!

Merton's proposal"The Matthew Effect", originally referred to the problem of scholarly publishing in the scientific community.

Take advantage of it and keep up the good work! It's not worth selling it now, and people also have to look at your user activity, not just the number of users!

2000 people is not too much. Let's try it first... It's not worth much. But can be your target customer... Because you can't be sure about the quality of the fans... It's still very easy to brush powder now...

Why sell it, this is a public resource, how good it is to keep it. Maybe it's a business opportunity in the future. If you sell it, you probably won't be able to buy much.

Keep doing it, it's not worth it yet.

When you borrow money, you have to be prepared not to pay it back, just buy a lesson, see this person clearly, it is still cost-effective, so as not to suffer a big loss. When the tuition is over, look at the opening point!

In the past, I had lent money to several people in the dormitory, but very little was recovered. Later, I thought it wouldn't work, and then I took the initiative to ask them to pay it back, of course, the amount of money was at least a few dozen yuan. In fact, as long as you ask, they will be embarrassed to pay you back, they just forget.

Take the initiative to open your mouth, it's okay. If you borrow someone else's money, you will forget it, and when people ask you to ask for it, you will take the initiative to pay it back, can you still say that people are stingy? Now I sometimes speak, and that's okay.

Don't hold your mouth and get angry with yourself, it's not worth it

That's the social experience you've learned. Nothing. When you borrow money later, you will know who you can borrow and who you can't borrow. I used to borrow a small amount of money to study.

In this case, don't borrow money! That's how college is.

This is a society of desire, all the beautiful things that women want need money, this is materialism At the same time, women also need love, so all women want to have a man who can satisfy their two aspects But if a man can only bring you the same, then it depends on the choice of different women, some choose love, some choose material But in fact, many women are self-deception, those who choose love will say to themselves, money can be earned together in the future Those who choose material things will say to themselves, maybe I will fall in love with him after being together for a long time... In reality, if you can't find the perfect man, then pluck up the courage to give up... Regardless of whether she chooses people or money, she is a strong woman who dares to face reality.

In the world of women, it is difficult for men to understand, there are women who love money, and there are women who love people. Individuals have different thoughts, so their views are different. If I had to choose, I would choose the rich one. It's good to have money.

It depends on what kind of woman some women like money, some women like men, most women like rich men, so women are chic, and so on.

Hey, the reality of today's society is that a man without money has no woman to love

There's no money to make, and that man's quality is the most important.