Online and so on Brothers, little brother is in trouble, here are 3 digital cameras Can anyone tell

The third Kodak C813 is recommended

8 million pixels, 3x optical zoom lens, inch 10,000 pixel LCD screen.

Samsung A55W

5 million pixels, zoom, inch screen, 200,000 pixels, mainly can video, and it is a 28mm wide angle. You can take a group photo, and the scenery or something.

Pixels are second,500Play can also be used,SamsungA55W is better in terms of performance,But Kodak is better in terms of workmanship,Samsung's things are easier to break,(Personally, I don't recommend Samsung's quality,And this is 2 mobile phones,So it's best to find a good quality),Choose Kodak,Old brand,Although C813 is a low-end product,But it's cost-effective,Can be used for a while。

Samsung is a brand that cannot be bought, and second-hand cannot be bought.

Kodak C813 can. The little girl in my store bought a C713 for 300 yuan, and the imaging quality is better than the new Canon Ixus.

Kodak is very solid. It's an established manufacturer.

Personally, I think the Kodak C813 is good. The result is very professional. Samsung's camera is really not very good.

It's all average, do you have to choose among the three, Kodak is slow, Samsung has drawbacks, and these are probably all foreign garbage It's better to buy a second-hand home locally.

Samsung S860 I have a personal use **Pretty much to see me.

It's better not to buy these than to buy them.

I recommend the Canon A495, this camera is very cost-effective, it is Canon's cheapest camera, it is very practical as far as the requirements you mentioned are blue, ** under a thousand. 10 million pixels, 3x optical zoom"10,000-pixel LCD screen.

Advantages: cost-effective, about 820 yuan; Good picture quality; The book-like appearance is cute (I personally think it).

Disadvantages: no optical image stabilization, low pixel of the LCD screen, and not wide enough at the wide-angle end.

Canon A3000 IS

10 million pixels, 4x optical zoom"230,000-pixel LCD screen, with optical image stabilization function, and a variety of colors are available.

Advantages: the camera is cost-effective, about 950 yuan; Good picture quality; There is optical image stabilization.

Disadvantages: The wide-angle end is not wide enough.

Panasonic FH1GK

12.1 million pixels, 5x optical zoom"230,000-pixel LCD screen, 28mm wide angle, optical image stabilization, blue appearance.

Advantages: cost-effective, about 1000 yuan; 28mm wide angle; There is optical image stabilization.

Disadvantages: In my opinion, the card machine is basically sufficient, and there are no obvious shortcomings.

The above three cameras are based on the fact that I personally feel that Canon's image quality and imaging are a little better, and the colors are a little more realistic. All three models perform well, and the Canon A495 is the first choice if you talk about cost-effectiveness and practicality alone; followed by the Canon A3000 IS; In terms of comprehensive performance, due to the wide angle and light defense of Panasonic FH1GK, it is good if you do not have a special preference for image quality and color requirements, and the practicality is good.

**I use my location** to give you a reference, because there may be a price difference due to different regions.

Panasonic FP1

Fashionable appearance, light and thin and easy to carry, fully automatic operation.

12.1 million pixels are convenient for cropping and production, the Leica lens ensures high-quality images, the 35-140mm focal length script meets all needs, and the optical image stabilization function of scenery and portrait makes your ** no matter how you shoot.

Dedicated rechargeable lithium battery has a long battery life.

Recommend Panasonic FP8, beautiful, practical and cheap, because Panasonic does not care about the cost to use this machine to earn reputation.

FP8 has a wide angle, a relatively large aperture, and a high-cost ED lens that is rare in its kind, coupled with Panasonic's industry-first quality guarantee, and now Panasonic's new FP series is a performance downgrade and upgrade, which shows FP8's ultra-high cost performance.

The only drawback of the FP8 is that there is no lens cap, but there is a high-strength UV lens, and even some netizens took the key to swipe through the lens, which is not damaged at all.

In fact, in Japan, Panasonic is the first in the field of home cameras in foreign countries, and then Fuji (the general quality of the workmanship is generally cost-effective, and the F series has long occupied the title of the king of card camera image quality) Sony (the quality of the workmanship is generally technological innovation, but it is valuable to buy 2,000 yuan with a back-illuminated sensor, and the hardware defects of the battery lock jitter door do not change, and the unlucky people should buy it carefully), Canon is just more advertising in China, and there are many people, and it is expensive, not worth buying.

FP8 supply is not much, FP1, FH1 can be used as an alternative, the licensed goods of the machine plus spare batteries, memory cards are about 1400 yuan.

Sony T99

Canon ixus 210

The selling price is under 2000.

Both of these are 14 million pixels! However, the general household does not need to use full pixel photos, which is a waste of storage space, and generally 5 million is enough! Unless you're going to put a big **!