The Sony A200 DSLR set of 70 120mm telephoto lenses is not worth buying

I used the A200 before, and it's a very good entry-level machine!

There is no 70-120mm telephoto lens, you guess you are talking about a 75-300mm f4, lens, because I also bought a double-ended lens before.

My personal experience is, don't buy it, this lens is not sharp enough, although it is a cheap telephoto, but I think that when it comes to photography, don't buy a lot of dog heads at once, buy a good one at a time, and it can be used for a long time. This shot of mine was sold cheaply by half of my price, which is a waste.

You can consider the 55-200 set of heads, this one is a little better, the same price.

Or save money to buy a 50 Sony header, this 1000 yuan, a very cost-effective lens.

If you buy a Sony machine, it is recommended to use a prime macro. The heads of each deputy factory are good. It is not recommended to buy 70-120.

Because it's not long, it's not short. The macro is marked by a macro character on the lens. If you don't have it, it's not a macro head.

The difference between a macro and a normal lens is the distance at which the focus is reached. The macro head can be very close to the subject, but the normal one is not. Ordinary ones are close to the subject and out of focus.

Tamron 90mm macro Sigma 105mm macro. Both of these heads are of high quality.

70-120 ？？What kind of lens is this,Sony set is not such a lens,The two sets are 18-70 and 75-300,It is estimated that you are talking about Minolta70-210 F4,If so, this lens is very good,Very cost-effective,But you can only go to the second-hand one,At present**It is about 2000 yuan。 If you want to shoot good macro works, an excellent macro head is indispensable, it is recommended to buy Sony Baiwei or Tamron SP90

No macro. The pullover is definitely worth buying, and the cheap effect can also be.

70 120 is not a telephoto, it can only be a medium and short focus, and you can enter a 50 200 medium focus.

With a DSLR, the body doesn't matter, the key is in the lens.

On the lens, you must be willing to spend money and be able to do it in one step. Be sure to do it all in one step.

The ** of the SLR lens determines his quality. Buy the expensive one, definitely right.

In addition, the three round buttons on the lens body are used for focus locking, so when you press and hold, you will not continue to focus autofocus. The zoom ring and the manual focus ring don't need to be explained. This advanced lens is all full-time manual priority autofocus.

In the autofocus state, the manual focus ring can also be rotated for fine adjustment.

Yes? The kind of three switches, three buttons?

There are 3 switches on the side of the lens barrel that control the autofocus.

At the top is the Auto Manual Focus Toggle switch, in the middle is DMF, the standard mode is AF before you can focus manually, and the FTIME mode is the manual priority mode.

The switch at the bottom allows the user to limit the minimum focusing distance to 3m. The closest distance of this lens is meters, and when set to the nearest 3 meters, the focusing speed will be increased a bit.

The three buttons on the front of the lens barrel are the focus lock button, and the three buttons are set so that you can quickly find this button in any shooting style. With Sony's high-end cameras, it seems that it can also be set to a depth of field preview function.

What about your manual. Isn't it right in there?

Does Sony have a 650-1300 lens?

Minolta's longest focal length is 600f4, and it also has 1200 with a double teleconverter.

However, with the A230 with this is! Ay.

Pay attention to whether it is a manual lens, and if it is a manual lens, use M gear. Also, pay attention to the minimum focusing distance.

650-1300mm telephoto... I really haven't seen it.

When shooting with a manual lens, you need to select 'No lens release shutter' in the settings, which is allowed.

It is recommended to buy A200

In the case that the A200 is not equipped with a separate lens, the A200 lacks a telephoto focal length and is inferior to the S205 in terms of its ability to shoot long-distance scenes

The macro capability of the A200 sleeve is also not as good as that of the S205

In addition to these two points, within the scope of the A200 sleeve's ability to shoot, when shooting general landscapes and portraits, from image quality to the speed of operation, in the level, texture, color, noise of the picture, in the boot speed, shutter delay, focusing accuracy and speed, accuracy, envy and permeable power durability and other aspects, A200 is much stronger than S205.

After all, the A200 is a DSLR, and the S205 is just DC. The gap between them is the gap between professional and amateur standards (although the A200 is cheap and low-end in the professional class).

So, unless you have special requirements for telephoto and macro, don't consider the S205.

There are two reasons why Sony's DSLR is bad: one is that it has poor noise suppression at high ISO compared to Canon Nikon. The second is that the lens group of Sony Brother Tour is not large enough, and the later expansion is more restricted.

The first problem is that there is no need to worry when comparing SLR and DC. As a DSLR, the A200 is still much, much stronger than a DC like the S205. The second problem is only affected if you plan to expand it with a lot of lenses in the future.

This doesn't matter when you're basically using just a sleeve (up to one additional portrait or macro or telephoto head).

If you don't plan to go with multiple lenses, the A200 is much more cost-effective than Canon and Nikon.