Which do you think is more important, morality or the rule of law?

The rule of law is even more important! Because violating morality can only be condemned, there is no way to better restrain people from certain bad behaviors. If the stakes are big enough, then I don't think you, including yourself, will be willing to go against it! Human nature is selfish

So there is no way, in order for human beings to develop better and more orderly, and not to let people cross some conventional boundaries, there is a law! Let people understand what you can't do and what the consequences will be. The rule of law is to give people a strong restriction!

To sum up, in the long run, the legal system is more important than maintaining social stability.

According to the dialectical relationship of philosophy, they are mutually opposed, unified, interdependent, and indispensable. Morality is the foundation, the legal system is the guarantee, and morality is the minimum for a person to do things.

This topic has been discussed for a long time, Legalism and Confucianism.

The controversy is the best illustration, but in the end, it ended with the decline of Legalism and the gradual emergence of Confucianism as orthodoxy, which also shows that Confucian moral education was the final choice of the wise rulers at that time. Even today, the debate continues, but the point of view remains the same. Socialist market economy.

It is the perfect unity of the rule of law and morality.

For a society, the rule of law is more important! Morality is a supplement to the law!

For individuals, morality is more important than law!

I think that both should be equally important, and there is no more important conclusion, such a conclusion is more in line with modern society.

A lot of people have been arguing about which is more important, morality or the rule of law, but I have always believed that both are in the same place in one way or another. Ethics and the rule of law go hand in hand, just as the moon and the sun both exist at the same time. Even if it disappears, no human being can survive on Earth.

The same is true of ethics and the rule of law for the stability of society. Morality is the bottom line of the law, and the fundamental purpose of the existence of the rule of law is to restrain people's behavior. A law-abiding person does not necessarily have to be ethical, after all, both have limitations in many ways.

Therefore, there is no more important doctrine. <>

In addition to being in equal positions in terms of status, I think the meaning of the existence of the two is different. We need to understand that laws were made by human beings to restrain a person from doing harm to others. But morality comes from the heart of human beings, and it is human beings themselves who understand what kind of things to do and what not to do.

Therefore, law is to restrain the behavior of others, while morality is to restrain one's own inner dirty thoughts. The two are fundamentally different in the sense of existence, and different moral constraints and different laws are required in different situations. <>

As I said above, morality and law go hand in hand. Both of these are important factors in the formation of society, and without either one, the whole society will fall into chaos. It is necessary to understand that the development of human society has been established on the basis of the rule of law since ancient times, and the survival of human beings in society is constrained by morality.

People who abide by morality are naturally nobler in terms of personality, and are always able to make reasonable choices in the face of anything, rather than acting recklessly. <>

I think that in human society, both morality and the rule of law are very important; Because this is related to people's behavior, and the law restricts their behavior, if it is true that these two things are true, the whole world will become chaotic, and human society will also undergo earth-shaking changes.

The rule of law is more important in human society, and only with the rule of law can we regulate everyone's behavior and avoid bad things from happening.

I think it depends on the situation. Because sometimes morality can override the rule of law, and if morality can't restrain him, then the law will.

Law and morality are closely linked, and they influence each other, penetrate each other, and interact with each other. At the same time, as different parts of the superstructure of society, there is a significant difference between law and morality. The connection between socialist law and socialist morality:

1) The role of socialist morality on law:

First, socialist morality is the value guidance for the formulation of socialist laws.

Second, the role of socialist morality in promoting the implementation of the law.

Third, socialist morality can make up for the deficiencies of socialist law in adjusting social relations.

2) The role of socialist law in moral construction:

First, in the form of legal norms, the socialist law affirms certain principles and requirements of socialist morality and makes them have the attributes of law.

Second, socialist law is an important aspect of socialist moral education.

Legal basis. Article 24 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China: The State strengthens the building of socialist spiritual civilization through the popularization of education on ideals, morality, culture, discipline and the legal system, and through the formulation and implementation of various codes and conventions among the masses in different areas of urban and rural areas. The State advocates the core values of socialism, advocates the public virtues of loving the motherland, the people, labor, science, and socialism, conducts education in patriotism, collectivism, internationalism, and communism among the people, conducts education in dialectical materialism and historical materialism, and opposes capitalism, feudalism, and other decadent ideas.

1. What is the relationship between morality and law?

1. There are two important manifestations of the intersection and penetration of law and morality: one is that legal consciousness and moral concepts are related to each other with the same attribute, and second, the scope of regulation and control of legal norms and moral norms overlaps and tolerates each other. Generally speaking, whatever is prohibited and sanctioned by law is also prohibited and condemned by morality; Whatever is required and encouraged by law is also the one that morality cultivates and promotes.

On the other hand, many moral concepts are also embodied in the law, and many moral problems are also issues that can be solved by law. However, from the perspective of the scope of normative role, law and morality have different levels of requirements for people's behavior. The former can generally only stipulate the minimum behavioral requirements, while the latter can solve higher-level problems in people's spiritual life and social behavior.

For example, morality can require people to "benefit others without self-interest", while laws can only stipulate that people must not harm others or benefit themselves or harm the public or private interests.

2. Legal basis: Article 10 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

The handling of civil disputes shall be in accordance with the law; Where the law does not provide for it, custom may be applied, but it must not be contrary to public order and good customs.

2. What is the legal relationship between the labor contract and the labor contract?

1) The legal nature of the two is different. The labor contract is the basis for establishing the labor relationship, which records the rights and obligations of both the employer and the employee, and belongs to the scope of labor law adjustment = and the labor contract (such as contracting, processing, transportation contract, etc.) is the basis for establishing civil legal relationship and belongs to the scope of civil law adjustment;

2) The subject of the contract is different. One of the main parties of the labor contract is the employee, and the other party must be the employer = and the labor contract can occur between a citizen and a legal person, or between a citizen or a legal person;

3) In the stage of contract performance, the status of the two parties is different. After the labor contract is signed, the employee becomes an internal member of the employer and shall obey the employer's command and management of the labor process, and his labor is regarded as a part of the employer's total labor, and the relationship between the two is subordinate. In a labor contract, there is no subordinate relationship between the parties (e.g., between the contractor and the contractor), and the two parties are always independent and equal subjects, and at the same time perform their contractual obligations in their own names.

4) The content of the contract is different. The content of the labor contract stipulates that the employer provides working conditions for the employee, and the work completed by the employee is part of the entire labor process, while one party to the labor contract does not necessarily provide the other party with working conditions.

5) The principles for determining remuneration are different. In the labor contract, the employer pays labor remuneration according to the quantity and quality of labor, and implements the principle of distribution according to work = while in labor contract, labor remuneration is generally paid according to the principle of equal compensation.

In both morality and law, there are things that must be done, what is forbidden, and what is free to do, and the first two are obligations. The last is the right, from the point of view of what must be done, life is like on the stage of society, everyone is performing, they are sincerely acting in a play according to their inner beliefs and morals, for themselves and others, everyone is both an audience and an actor, the relationship between individuals and others is to serve and be served, reflecting the need for people to work together quickly, a good director is like a good manager, and the standard of his command is like the law, A good director will handle his relationship with the actors and the actors, and let the actors play as freely as possible. And from the point of view of the forbidden things, life is like on the field, because there are contradictions between people in the competition in the game as if it is a player, the individual and the opponent is the relationship between the confrontation and the confrontation, there is only one winner, and the opposite side is reflected between people, at this time the manager is replaced by a referee, his management standard is like the law, he will use the legal standard to punish the player or team with warnings, yellow cards, red cards, penalty points and eviction to maintain justice, and if the player has a good inner morality, Do not do things that infringe on the opponent (in reality, it means that when an individual encounters a conflict with others, do not confront others, do not participate in confrontation with others) and quit the field, if the players are like this, no one does the game against each other, it is estimated that the referee will be unemployed, and he does not need to punish anyone with any standards.

So in reality, if a person chooses to be clean and good to others, then it is morally important.