Those who understand the law should seek it quickly! If you add! 20

The police station has received the police to deal with it, and should issue a power of attorney for both of you to evaluate the injury, and you will treat each of your own diseases, and then take the power of attorney to the forensic medical appraisal clinic for injury evaluation, and the police station will handle it separately according to the facts of the investigation and the results of the evaluation

1. AB is a minor injury, and the police station mediates the compensation matters between the two parties in accordance with the provisions of the "Public Security Administration Punishment Law", if the compensation is in place and the case is closed, if the mediation fails, A or B can sue the court to demand civil compensation from the other party, including medical expenses, lost work expenses, nursing expenses, transportation expenses, etc.;

2. A is slightly injured and B is slightly injured, and the police station may criminally detain B, because B has constituted the crime of intentional injury and goes through criminal procedures, A may file a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case before the court trial, and demand B to compensate for various losses; Vice versa;

3. AB is a minor injury, the police station can criminally detain both parties, AB has constituted the crime of intentional injury, go through criminal procedures, one party can file a civil lawsuit attached to the criminal case before the court trial, and demand that the other party compensate for various losses; or if the police station does not deal with it, one party may directly sue the court with the appraisal results, demanding that the other party be held criminally responsible and compensated for various losses.

According to what you said, A can be characterized as legitimate defense.

According to article 20 of the Criminal Law, justifiable self-defense is a limited act to prevent the infringement of the public interest, the personal and other rights of the person or others by means of means that cause certain damage to the perpetrator who is committing an unlawful offense. It can be seen that there are four conditions for justifiable defense: First, it must be against an unlawful offense.

second, it must be against an ongoing unlawful violation; Third, it must be directed against the person who committed the unlawful violation; Fourth, defense must not exceed the necessary limits.

B not only assaulted A himself, but also gathered several people to beat A with weapons (sticks can be identified as weapons), which already constituted the crime of assembling a crowd to fight, and A could defend himself in the face of criminal aggression.

If there is evidence that what you say is true.

Then, a is justifiable defense.

Since it was justified self-defense, then B's injuries were entirely self-inflicted. Instead, they should bear responsibility for the harm caused to a.

First of all, this is a public order case at best.

When did the court give you a prescription?

Do you know how much money and effort it takes?

The police station handled the public security case.

If you can't do it, spend money to buy a few cigarettes and ask the errand to eat.

This method is simple, convenient and feasible.

It's impossible not to want to spend money.

At most, you accompany him to the doctor, and he accompanies you to the doctor.

It is the public that implements the benefits, understand?

From the lawyer team of Fabang.com.