Seek help from comrades who understand the law, and ask comrades who understand the law for help

Hello, of course right! According to the Marriage Law and the General Principles of Civil Law, the son suffers from mental illness, he is a person with no or limited capacity for civil conduct, and his parents have the legal obligation to support him, and there are two suites that belong to the son, and the son has the ownership of the house, because, no matter from the perspective of the father-son relationship and the ownership of property rights, the father has no right to take the son, and his behavior is illegal, and there is a suspicion of abandonment, if it is established, it is suspected of the crime of abandonment!

There's also the question of whether the house she lived in was her father's own when her wife died, and if it wasn't a joint property, then his mother died, and his son still had a share of the property, 1 4.

If the father refuses to carry out the guardianship responsibility, other relatives can sue the father and make the father bear legal responsibility, and they can also request a change of guardianship.

Labor Contract Law, I hope it will be useful to you.

Article 46 Under any of the following circumstances, the employer shall pay economic compensation to the worker:

1) The worker terminates the labor contract in accordance with the provisions of Article 38 of this Law;

2) The employer proposes to terminate the labor contract to the employee in accordance with the provisions of Article 36 of this Law and terminates the labor contract through consultation with the employee;

3) The employer terminates the labor contract in accordance with the provisions of Article 40 of this Law;

4) The employer terminates the labor contract in accordance with the provisions of the first paragraph of Article 41 of this Law;

5) Terminating a fixed-term labor contract in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 1 of Article 44 of this Law, except in the case where the employer maintains or improves the agreed conditions of the labor contract and the employee does not agree to renew the labor contract;

6) Termination of the labor contract in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs 4 and 5 of Article 44 of this Law;

7) Other circumstances provided for by laws and administrative regulations.

Article 47 Economic compensation shall be paid to the worker according to the number of years he or she has worked in the unit and one month's salary for each full year. where it is more than six months but less than one year, it is calculated as one year; If it is less than six months, the worker shall be paid half a month's salary.

If the monthly wage of a worker is three times higher than the average monthly wage of the employee in the previous year announced by the people of the municipality directly under the Central Government or the city divided into districts where the employer is located, the standard of severance shall be paid to him at the rate of three times the average monthly wage of the employee, and the maximum period of payment of severance shall not exceed 12 years.

The term "monthly wage" mentioned in this article refers to the average salary of an employee in the 12 months prior to the termination or dissolution of the labor contract.

Article 48 Where an employer dissolves or terminates a labor contract in violation of the provisions of this Law, and the worker requests to continue to perform the labor contract, the employer shall continue to perform it; If the employee does not request to continue to perform the labor contract or the labor contract can no longer be performed, the employer shall pay compensation in accordance with Article 87 of this Law.

Article 38 An employee may terminate a labor contract under any of the following circumstances:

1) Failure to provide labor protection or working conditions in accordance with the provisions of the labor contract;

2) Failure to pay labor remuneration in full and in a timely manner;

3) Failure to pay social insurance premiums for workers in accordance with the law;

4) The rules and regulations of the employer violate the provisions of laws and regulations and harm the rights and interests of workers;

5) The labor contract is invalid due to the circumstances specified in the first paragraph of Article 26 of this Law;

6) Other circumstances under which the labor contract may be terminated by laws and administrative regulations.

If an employer forces an employee to work by means of violence, threats or illegal restriction of personal freedom, or if the employer directs or forces the employee to perform risky work in violation of rules and regulations and endangers the employee's personal safety, the employee may immediately terminate the labor contract without prior notice to the employer.

1. It is illegal for the company to do so, and evidence is required if the legal procedure is taken;

2. The evidence is the labor contract, which is the key, without the labor contract, you must show the evidence that you are an employee of this unit;

3. If there is no labor contract, double wages should be paid, wages cannot be deducted, and no deposit is required;

4. You can negotiate with the company first, and if the negotiation fails, you can apply for labor arbitration, and the labor arbitration structure should be responsible.

You don't have a labor contract, do you? You can go directly to the labor bureau to report him, explain your situation, pretend to be pitiful, and they should come forward. It is now a society governed by the rule of law. Dude, don't do too much... I hope this answer is helpful to you

Article 14 of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance:

In any of the following circumstances, it shall be found to be a work-related injury:

6) On the way to and from work, being subjected to traffic accidents for which they are not primarily responsible, or urban rail transit, passenger ferries, etc

Injuries sustained in train accidents;

Your situation should be recognized as a work-related injury and I hope to help you.

Working hours, work location, and accidents caused by work are all work-related injuries. You are a work-related injury, and both work-related injuries and traffic accidents can be compensated.

It can be recognized as a work-related injury.

It is advisable to consult a local lawyer to protect your legal rights.

Count, but you have to call the police, you have to have an accident certificate, don't mediate casually.

According to the relevant regulations, you should be considered a work-related injury.

Attached: Relevant regulations.

Chapter III of the Regulations on Work-related Injury Insurance is the determination of work-related injuries.

Article 14 An employee shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury under any of the following circumstances:

1) Being injured in an accident during working hours and in the workplace due to work-related reasons;

2) Being injured in an accident while engaging in work-related preparatory or finishing work in the workplace before or after working hours; (3) Suffering violence or other accidental injuries during working hours and in the workplace as a result of performing work duties;

4) Suffering from occupational diseases;

5) Injured or unaccounted for in an accident while away for work;

6) Injured in a traffic accident or an accident involving urban rail transit, passenger ferry, or train for which they are not primarily responsible;

7) Other circumstances that laws and administrative regulations provide shall be recognized as work-related injuries.

Article 15 An employee shall be deemed to have suffered a work-related injury under any of the following circumstances:

1) Died of a sudden illness during working hours and at work, or died within 48 hours after rescue efforts failed;

2) Suffering harm in emergency rescue and disaster relief or other activities to preserve national or public interests;

3) Employees who previously served in the army, were disabled due to war or duty injuries, and have obtained the certificate of revolutionary disabled soldiers, and were injured after arriving at the employer. Where employees have any of the circumstances in items (1) or (2) of the preceding paragraph, they shall enjoy work-related injury insurance benefits in accordance with the relevant provisions of these Regulations; Employees who have the circumstances in item (3) of the preceding paragraph shall enjoy work-related injury insurance benefits other than a one-time disability subsidy in accordance with the relevant provisions of these Regulations.

Article 16: Where an employee meets the requirements of Articles 14 and 15 of these Regulations, but in any of the following circumstances, it shall not be recognized as a work-related injury or treated as a work-related injury:

1) Intentionally committing a crime;

2) Drunk or drug addiction;

3) Self-harm or suicide.

The Measures for the Determination of Work-related Injuries have been adopted by the 56th Ministerial Meeting of the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and will come into force on January 1, 2011. Please look for details.

work-related injury, apply for work-related injury recognition. At the same time, the perpetrators are required to pay compensation.

It's useful to learn a little bit about the law on a regular basis.

You said that your father signed an agreement with your grandparents when he was 87 years old, and this agreement is valid. 1: I want to ask if there is any other agreement in this agreement except that your grandparents will give the house to your father, for example, your father will provide for your grandparents.

If there is such an agreement in the agreement, and your grandparents need to provide for your father and your father did not fulfill this obligation, then your father has breached the contract, and your grandparents have the right to harvest this agreement and give this house to others, but it does not mean that your grandparents can do whatever they want, he must go through a court judgment to revoke the agreement signed with your father, and if there is no court judgment, the agreement will continue to be valid. 2: If your father has fulfilled his obligation to support your grandparents according to the agreement, then the house belongs to your father anyway, and it is invalid for your grandmother to give the house to your aunt without authorization, and your father can completely sue the court to claim his rights.

According to Article 20 of the Inheritance Law, the testator may revoke or change the will he has made. If there are several wills and the contents conflict, the final will shall prevail. Self-written, substitute books, audio recordings, and oral wills shall not be revoked or changed.

You ask your grandparents to sign a will with your father first, but the testator (i.e. your grandparents) can revoke or change their will, and in 2001, your grandparents can transfer their real estate to your aunt, and the previously signed will will of course no longer be valid. The transfer of real estate must be done with the presence of the property owner, that is, the consent of your grandparents must be obtained to transfer the property, unless your grandmother firmly denies that let the Tongbu house be transferred to your aunt and asks for the cancellation of the transfer registration, otherwise they certainly have the right to transfer their property to anyone.

The agreement is valid, but so is your act of giving to your grandmother. If true, your father will only be entitled to your grandfather's share of the house. Pei Wang Zheng (50% share of the house).

If your grandmother gave it to her voluntarily, then your agreement was negated by the later one, and it was invalid.

The agreement is valid. If what you say is true, you can go back to the house.

Hello, it is difficult to determine whether this actor has violated the law or committed a crime, and the following are possible situations:

1. If it is agreed to marry the other party for the purpose of illegally taking possession of other people's property, the marriage is only a means of fraud, and the circumstances are serious and may be suspected of a crime, even if it does not constitute a crime, it also violates the Public Security Administration Punishment Law, therefore, it is recommended to report to the police in this case;

Second, the two parties are in a romantic relationship, saying that they are married but not married, and they are married to others, even if they are pregnant, this is not within the scope of the law, and it is adjusted by morality, of course, it is not a crime! However, if you give birth to a child at the end, in this case, you can ask the other party to pay child support, and if the negotiation fails, you can file a lawsuit with the court;

3. If you are engaged and pay the bride price to the other party, but you are not married in the end, you can ask the other party to return the bride price, and if you fail, you can file a lawsuit with the court;

Hope the above knowledge is helpful to you!!

Engagement cannot be considered divorce in law, if the man has deceived the woman's property, he can be convicted of fraud, but if he cheats his feelings, at most he will be morally condemned, protect himself.

I didn't think the man was breaking the law, but the woman was breaking the law. Since they're all separated, and they don't want to be together anymore, don't bite like this, and live your own life.

If a woman gives birth to a child, the man has an obligation to support her. If the man receives more money from the woman, he should return it; A large amount of money may constitute fraud.

If the man just breaks up normally, the woman will also violate his reputation.

It belongs to "causeless management", which is not enough to select, but you can try it.