-
In terms of floating-point computing power, Intel's processors generally only have two floating-point execution units, while AMD's processors are generally designed with three parallel floating-point execution units, so among processors of the same grade, the floating-point computing power of AMD processors is better than Intel's processors. It has strong floating-point arithmetic capabilities, which is advantageous for game applications and 3D processing applications. In addition, in terms of multi-** instructions, Intel has developed the SSE instruction set, which has now developed to SSE3, and AMD has also developed a corresponding, enhanced 3D NOW!
Instruction set. In contrast, Intel's processor is slightly better than AMD's in terms of multi-instruction, and there are many software optimized for SSE, so in multi-** software and plane processing software, compared with AMD processors of the same grade, Intel's CPU appears to have more advantages. In addition, what kind of CPU to choose,** is a more critical factor, in terms of performance, the same grade of Intel processor as a whole may have a little advantage over AMD's processor, but in terms of **, AMD's processor is absolutely superior.
For example: Intel's P4** is about 1200, and AMD's Barton 2500+, which has similar performance, is only priced at about 600.
In the end, do you choose AMD or Inte's CPU? From the above, it can be understood that AMD's CPU has advantages over Intel's processors of the same grade in three-dimensional production, game applications, and processing, while Intel's CPU has advantages in commercial applications, multi-applications, and graphic design. In addition to the use, it is also necessary to consider the cost performance.
In this way, you can choose the most suitable CPU according to your actual use and capital budget.
-
The main thing is the difference in the L2 cache. To discuss this issue is very deep, generally people say that AMD's L2 cache is lower than Intel's, that is just a superficial statement, their technical construction is different, there is no analogy. AMD's dual-core is a dual-core in the true sense of the word, and it is integrated together, while Intel's.
It's actually called a dual-core separately, which is extremely emotional.
-
First, cost-effective
All along, because Intel is the leader in x86 processors. ** Consistently high. Because of its low market share, AMD has always been relatively close to the people.
But if you look at the performance per unit purchase, AMD processors tend to offer more cores, or more threads, and faster, regardless of the price point. At the same time, it has a built-in graphics card that can be used to firefight with a discrete graphics card and is equipped with a heatsink.
2. Overclocking performance
As we all know, overclocking performance has always been AMD's strong suit. However, what many people don't know is that Intel is really good at high-end overclocking. Intel's overclockable K-series CPUs are paired with Z-series motherboards and water-cooled coolers.
Unleash the extreme performance of Intel processors. For example, the 9th generation Coffee Lake Refresh processor can be clocked at more than 5GHz.
Third, the CPU performance is not the same
Intel's main advantages are that single-core performance is strong, stability is strong, and technology is advanced, which is beyond doubt, for example, in the latest ladder diagram, Intel's CPU is also the king of the machine.
At the current stage, for the x86 architecture, both AMD and Intel are roughly optimized to the limit, turbo-boost is also available in AMD's next-generation CPU, and hyper-threading technology will also be built into AMD's next-generation CPU, but AMD can't call its own technology hyper-threading because of trademarks.
-
Intel and AMD are both the most well-known and influential processor manufacturers in the computer market today. Both brands have their own strengths and weaknesses in terms of performance, stability, and power management. Therefore, there is no direct answer to this question, and you can only choose according to different user needs and application scenarios.
If you're an advanced gamer or a worker who needs big data analytics and you might need a high-speed performance processor, then Intel might be a better fit for you. Intel processors are strong at single-threaded performance, are responsive to games or applications, and have a strong overclocking potential. In addition, Intel's software developer ecosystem is more robust, with more developer tools and in-depth support.
On the other hand, if you're a user who needs daily office work and light gaming use, maybe consider AMD as a good choice. AMD offers higher value processors, which typically have more compute cores and exhibit better multi-threaded performance. Because AMD relies on more physical cores and a design philosophy that focuses on functional integration, their processors are generally able to offer better price/performance with the same amount of power.
Of course, these are just suggestions, and everyone's specific needs and application scenarios are different. When you're deciding which brand to choose, it's a good idea to do some more research and comparison. It is also important to note that there are other factors that affect the performance of a computer, such as memory and hard disk capacity.
AMD garbage?
If you can't do it yourself, don't scream. >>>More
If you buy a 710, it is recommended that you build a 3A platform, (A core + AU + A card), which has good stability.
It seems that China Mobile and China Unicom are the same, let's do it yourself In terms of floating-point computing power, Intel's processors generally only have two floating-point execution units, while AMD's processors are generally designed with three parallel floating-point execution units, so among the processors of the same grade, the floating-point computing power of AMD processors is better than Intel's processors. It has strong floating-point arithmetic capabilities, which is advantageous for game applications and 3D processing applications. In addition, in terms of multi-** instructions, Intel has developed the SSE instruction set, which has now developed to SSE3, and AMD has also developed a corresponding, enhanced 3D NOW! >>>More
You look at AMD's PR value. For example, AMD Sempron 2500+, this 2500+ is the PR value. >>>More
Hello! The PD820 does not have the same high clock speed as the 524 (P4 524:; But it's about the same, the gap is basically not seen in practical applications, but the front-side bus 820 is 800MHz, 524 is 533MHz is not a grade at all, but the performance of the intel processor is very, very sensitive to the front-end bus, and the external frequency 524 is only 133, 820 but there is 200 too much difference, the processor performance is also sensitive to the external frequency, and 820 is dual-core, which causes the performance in practical applications to be much stronger than 524, One core of 820 is much stronger than 524, not to mention that 820 has two cores. >>>More