Intel 524 3 06G vs Intel PD Dual Core 820 2 8G Which is better

Hello! The PD820 does not have the same high clock speed as the 524 (P4 524:; But it's about the same, the gap is basically not seen in practical applications, but the front-side bus 820 is 800MHz, 524 is 533MHz is not a grade at all, but the performance of the intel processor is very, very sensitive to the front-end bus, and the external frequency 524 is only 133, 820 but there is 200 too much difference, the processor performance is also sensitive to the external frequency, and 820 is dual-core, which causes the performance in practical applications to be much stronger than 524, One core of 820 is much stronger than 524, not to mention that 820 has two cores.

Therefore, in the case that the difference is not very large, it is recommended to buy a boxed pentiumd 820, which coincides with the fact that the 820 is now significantly reduced in price and is very cost-effective, so the 820 is highly recommended, of course, the motherboard must be able to support at least 800MHz front-side bus. FYI.

Almost, if I told you that the early 478 stitches were good, you wouldn't believe it! But it is. Computers are now in a state of compliance, and so on for new products.

It depends on what you're doing with them! Personally, I think it's better to be dual-core! The high frequency is indeed much better when processing images, but in the future, people have used multiple processes, and this high frequency is not the solution to the problem, or is it better to double.

Personally, I think. In the case of daily low-task work such as ordinary word processing, the speed of the two is similar, but the overall host configuration of a single core can be relatively cheap. Compared with dual-core, it has better performance in handling multi-media, or running Vista system in the future, and multitasking, etc., and it is also the mainstream configuration next year, so I think it should be PD820 better.

PD it, after all, dual-core. Two wives are better than one.

AMD3600+ is better. Because the power consumption of 3600+ is lower than that of PD820...The performance is also a little better.

AMD launched a dual-core processor, and then Inter launched a PD series of dual-core processors, AMD once claimed that PD's processor is a fake dual-core, but in fact, PD is also a real dual-core, but some of PD's performance is indeed slightly lower than Athlon dual-core, but there are also many advantages, the reason why the Pentium dual-core will be a little slower, is because the information of the PD CPU is also processed through the northbridge chip on the motherboard, and the Athlon dual-core is solved inside the CPU, These two CPUs in the same price range have an advantage in terms of gaming. In terms of many **, everyone is still optimistic about the Pentium processor.

However, the best processor is the Inter Core 2, the processor. It's so much inferior to all the other CPUs! Including what you said about 3600+, you're just an entry-level dual-core processor.

But. The design of the PD is indeed inferior to AMD's CPU

pd p4..Intel's two major failures.

The landlord does not need to be discouraged or in a hurry.

These two CPUs have their own strengths, and it can't be said that which one is completely better than the other Intel's CPU has the advantage in the **compression algorithm (because it has its own instruction set), and it has its own advantages in multi**format compression and decoding.

AMD's CPU floating-point arithmetic is stronger, and it is more powerful in gaming, so let's say that both have their own strengths.

Of course, it's AMD3600, I'm using AMD, I've tested it with professional software, and AMD's performance is much higher than 820

The profession on the seventh floor, hehe.

These 2 U's are almost the same level, but they are different in terms of different calculations. But AMD's CPU is notoriously more game-efficient than Intel's, and Intel's CPU multi-processing performance is outstanding. So it can only be said that each has its own strengths, and the actual correlation should not be very far.

However, AMD's biggest feature is its low price and good performance.

Of course, 3600+ is good, 3600+ and PD915 can be compared.

That's right, 3600 is good, low frequency and high energy.

The PD 820 feels good.

Actual gaming performance AMD3600+ is good,

At the same frequency inter is better, the one above is a bit wrong, AMD now splits flash dragon and athlon.

AMD seems to be a poison dragon and a speed dragon.

Of course, it's PD 820 fast, if the landlord's machine is not as fast as Celeron, it may be caused by other components, after all, computer performance is comprehensive.

The PD820 is faster, it should be dual-core!

Level 2 cache senior!

It's just a little bit more calorific.

If you have already selected this board, it is definitely PD, because the board only supports PD. But it is still recommended to choose 3800+, the board you can look at the kn9s of abit

Don't look at any of the PD series. Old architecture. It's also hot.

Be sure to buy button meat on intel. Otherwise, go on the dual-core.

Your motherboard is set, and you can only use PD. In fact, intel is still good, and the stability is still good!

Of course, it's good to dig up the noisy pd820, but the difference is too great. The PD820 is dual-core, and the Saiwan Xiangyang is single-core. The 915 motherboard cannot support the PD820 without flashing the BIOS

The 915GL series motherboards cannot support any dual-core CPU!Including PD820

It is for servers, not notebooks, so it cannot be compared to the T2350 of notebooks. But the architecture is older and shouldn't be comparable.

Don't know about the motherboard.

However, the two are processors of different architectures.

It should not be compatible with the respective sockets.

It is recommended to investigate the compatibility of the host.

2 processors.

The first PD should mean Pentium Dual Core.

This one will be more upscale.

The athlon 3800+ should not.

These 2 processors are not in the same grade...

PD 820 is recommended....

Dual-core, of course.

PD that hot u. If you buy it, you regret it.

It's good to buckle the meat, the dual-core stick is recommended, and 2G memory is recommended, otherwise it will be wasted

E2180 OK. Although the E2180 is also called Pentium Dual, it is a shrink board of the Core series, with Core's new architecture and true dual-core. However, the Besturn D820 is not a real dual-core, and the heat generation is also super huge, which is really inefficient and high consumption.

E2180, clockwork, 800MHz bus, 1MB L2 cache. Pentium D 820, main frequency, bus 800MHz, 2MB 820 numerical advantages only, the process technology is far inferior to the E series, or glue dual-core, two 478 era P4 glued together, heating power consumption is very high....Let's take a look at the CPU scores...Intel Pentium D, 742 points; intel pentium dual e2180 @

1,127 points; The gap is obvious.