About 8000 budget! Canon 60D 17 85 or Nikon D7000 18 55 .

2. The quality of the matching lens is better than Nikon's.

3. The operability of the camera, Nikon's design idea is to use the buttons of the camera as much as possible to adjust a parameter of the camera, so there are more buttons on the camera. The advantage of this design is that it is quick and easy to use when taking pictures, and it is very efficient. Canon, on the other hand, has a composite design of buttons, and one button often has to manage several functions, so the efficiency of use is often affected.

4. The durability of the camera, the service life of Nikon, especially the service life of the shutter, is obviously better, in the era of traditional film cameras, we do not have to consider the service life of the camera shutter, after all, the ** of film is expensive, and the digital age is different, because there is no consideration of the cost of use, the number of digital camera shooting ** has been greatly improved, and the shutter life of the previous camera is 10 times even if it is a very OK parameter, for digital cameras, it is too general.

5. In terms of individual parameters of the camera, the maximum resolution of Nikon SLR digital camera is 300dpi, while Canon's low-end digital camera has a maximum resolution of 240dpi, although there is not much difference between it on the computer and the general**, but if you want to do large-size inkjet painting and**, it will not work. This reason may not have a great impact on the general user, but if it is a user with the above needs, it is a problem that must be considered.

If it's just to have fun, travel and souvenir something. It doesn't matter if it's thick or not. The key ** is there.

Based on the above, I recommend the 60d but not the 17-85 portrait set, I recommend the 18-135 or 18-200 set.

If there are no special needs, there is no need to upgrade with lenses in the future. If you want to play lomo or a good portrait, it will be good to have a Canon 50 fixed focal head at that time, and the cost performance is super high**600 or so.

This is a perfect fit for basic photography.

And then there is. In other words, there is no need to choose 60d, 600d or 550d, and that's enough.

**Almost,It just depends on which style you like.,It is recommended to go to the major**forums to see these two machines**. It is recommended to buy a stand-alone machine plus fixed focus. Because the two zooms mentioned above are too ordinary, I have to change them not long after entering them, and I will regret it.

I have a 600d Canon, Nikon's has also played, in general, it's OK, if you just start to enter the SLR Canon, the operation may be simpler, the camera is only part of the factor, the technology is also needed, I heard people say that Nikon is better, the details are not very clear, as long as you use it, you can use it, hehe.

**Physical stores look at second-hand D7000 shutter times within 500 plus an 18--105 set of heads There are many.

It is recommended that you buy Pentax K5, which is completely more cost-effective than Nikon and Canon at the same price.

It's all good, I'm for Nikon.

Nikon 7500D and Canon 80D are better than Canon 80D, and the comparison is: maximum pixel comparison, highest resolution comparison, and focus method comparison.

1. Comparison of maximum pixels.

1. Nikon 7500D: The maximum number of pixels of Nikon 7500D is 21.51 million, the effective number of pixels is 20.88 million, and the number of pixels of Nikon 7500D is smaller.

2. Canon 80D: Canon 80D has a maximum pixel count of 25.8 million, an effective pixel count of 24.2 million, and a larger number of pixels for Canon 80D.

2. Comparison of the highest resolution.

1. Nikon 7500D: The maximum resolution of Nikon 7500D is 5568 3712, and the maximum resolution of Nikon 7500D is smaller.

2. Canon 80D: The maximum resolution of Canon 80D is 6000 4000, and the maximum resolution of Canon 80D is larger.

3. Comparison of focusing methods.

1. Nikon 7500D: Nikon 7500D has fewer focusing methods for autofocus and manual focusing, and Nikon 7500D has fewer focusing methods.

I'm a fan of Canon, so I'll choose Canon, but if my friends and relatives all use Nikon, and they have a lot of different lenses, I'll choose Nikon.

If you have friends and acquaintances around you, many of whom use Nikon, and they have many different types of lenses, you can choose Nikon, so that everyone's lenses can be interchangeable and save lens expenses.

The Nikon D7500 is better than the Canon 80D in terms of overall performance, and the Nikon D7500 in the evening market is recommended.

The two models you mentioned are Canon's entry-level machines, and the release is just different sooner or later, Canon prefers to upgrade in small steps, and the new model is not much different from the old model, so buy which one is right at the right price. The 18-55 sleeve is obviously not enough, but it can be equipped with a 55-250mmis lens, so that the focal length is basically complete, and the latter is not expensive. It is a kind of ignorance to say that the telephoto zoom head is used to shoot birds, and it is indispensable to shoot lotus flowers in summer, close-ups of people, and distant mountains.

The actual difference between the SLR entry models is not big, obviously the 600D is more cost-effective, the 18-55 lens can meet most of your use needs, and the actual daily use of the long focal length is not very much (except for birding, obviously 600D is not suitable for birding).

There is not much difference between the two, it depends on your budget. Which look you like, buy which. Actually, it's all the same.

The difference between Canon 600D and Canon 700D is still obvious, as an upgraded model of Canon 600D, Canon 700D has increased the touch screen of the camera and improved the shooting effect of the camera, in addition to the operability of the camera body and the material of the body have been significantly improved, so if the budget is not particularly tight, the newly listed Canon 700D should be a better choice, if you value the cost performance, the more cost-effective Canon 600D is also worth considering. The Canon 600D uses an 18-megapixel APS-C format CMOS sensor, which is exactly the same as its own 550D, 60D, and 7D. This high-pixel CMOS has a commendable resolution and a good overall quality.

Canon 600D has a more obvious upgrade compared to 550D, that is, Canon will be popular on the 60D, 1.04 million effective pixels dual-axis flip LCD to the entry-level powerhouse 600D, so when using live view to take pictures, Canon 600D will be very flexible! In addition, the Canon 600D is equipped with an improved auto mode, which makes it easier for beginners to control the camera. And the "BASIC +" mode that appeared for the first time on the 600D is also very worthy of further exploration; Of course, creative filter functions such as miniature landscapes and fisheye lenses have also been added, and it can be said that in various configurations, the Canon 600D is very close to its own 60D camera. It's just that there are more or less differences in focus, framing, power, shoulder screen, and volume.

18-55 novices are enough to practice so that you can know very well the focal length you really need, it is not recommended to buy your head indiscriminately, you must go out when you change your head or it is quite difficult, afraid of going into the soil, breaking or something.

In addition, I personally tend to be mirrorless, such as Sony's NEX series, which must have played a lot of SLR, and you will naturally understand that being small and light to be able to carry with you at all times is the king.