A better camera than the Sony Nex5C?

For you, this machine is good. You can also change to a DSLR. 5d2 can't afford it, 600d is enough to suffice.

The so-called effect is not given to you by the camera, it is the ability of the photographer, and the photographer's comprehensive use of lighting, composition, color, and post-grading. If you are not satisfied with your work, you should first look for problems within yourself. A good photographer can shoot a cinematic effect even if it is a home DV.

I majored in photography and videography, and I have time to communicate.

If you only from the hardware point of view, you can choose a DSLR, I am now using Canon 60D, up to 1920*1280 30 frames, but 30 frames you are in the moving state even if there is an anti-shake lens, I still feel that the frame rate can not keep up with the moving speed, although there will be no strong jelly effect, but for the high requirements of the profession, I do not recommend using the highest image quality. You can downgrade 1 stop to 1280*720 50 fps to shoot. For the NEX5C, I also recommend shooting with a high frame rate as much as possible.

As for this frame number format, you should be clear, I won't explain the n system and the PAL system.

Upstairs said that I don't recommend matching the Fitted Horse Head, but it should be equipped with Canon's original lens with IS stabilization. Even if you use the lowest level lens of 18-55is, the shiver effect is very good, better than that of DV. Of course, the focal length depends on your own needs to choose.

Hello glad for this question. Sony's NEX-5 series cameras are high-performance mirrorless cameras, which are popular for photographers because of their high image quality and excellent operating experience. Considering the deficit**, the NEX-5T and NEX-5R are two of the most popular cameras, with their lower ** and relatively good performance.

With a 16.2-million-pixel APS-C sensor, fast AF, and up to continuous shooting speeds, the NEX-5T can meet the needs of most photographers. In addition, the NEX-5T also has Wi-Fi and NFC wireless connection technology, which can easily connect to a smartphone for convenient shooting. The NEX-5R boasts newer technologies than the NEX-5T, such as fast AF, 4FPS continuous shooting speed, and a 17-megapixel APS-C sensor.

It also has Wi-Fi and NFC wireless connection technology, which makes it easy to connect to your smartphone for convenient shooting. Overall, both the NEX-5T and NEX-5R are excellent mirrorless cameras, and it is recommended to choose the right camera for you based on your needs and budget. Above, I hope this helps you, I wish you a happy life, thank you!

It is not recommended for the landlord to choose nex,This series is a micro-mirror machine,The overall cost performance is not high,Micro-single is in the category of low and not high,Although the small picture is also good,But it is difficult to upgrade,There is no lens to match it,Really buy a large lens with a very ugly。 Second, a mirrorless is very power-consuming, it is very inconvenient to travel, it won't take long to run out of power, this is not as good as a single-lens reflex, single-lens reflex is to manually adjust the focal length, and the micro-mirrorless photo browsing and framing need the screen to achieve, very power-consuming. In contrast, it's better to choose a single-lens reflex, and the entry-level single-lens reflex ** is not expensive, like Canon60D and 50D, three or four thousand with low configuration can be done, and it is convenient to upgrade in the future, just change the lens, and the cost performance is much higher than that of nex.

Both are the same, hehe, it's just the name, it's called nex5c in China, it's called nex5c in Japan, hehe, it's completely one person!

The nex5 is the model and the nex5c is the continental version.

The nex5ck is the single lens set 18-55.

There is it in the back of the instruction manual.

c means China, which is the licensed goods listed in Chinese mainland.

1. Change the focus option to DMF in the settings, so that you can not only autofocus, but also manual focus after the autofocus is completed.

2. Since the option of background defocusing appears, then you should have used the smart scene mode, so the focus is also autofocus, it is recommended to use P mode (program**), so that you will find that you can do a lot as you like when focusing.

3. I think you should know the role of background defocus, just to highlight the theme. For example, if you take a picture of your lover or child, and you want the character to be clear and the background blurred, you need to use the dial to blur the background to fully show the character's style.

4. Finally, it is recommended to read the manual if you have nothing to do.

The question is actually quite simple. Because of the NEX5, there are 15 focus points, and when autofocusing, you put what you want to focus on. That's it. Notice that when the autofocus is done, there is always a green frame. That is the focus point.

Background defocus is somewhat similar to bokeh.

The 3, C3, and F3 of the Sony NEX series belong to the entry-level category; 5, 5N, 5R belong to the mid-range, 7 belong to the high-end, and 6 is probably between 5 and 7.

The imaging effect of the first generation 3 and 5 is not good, which has left a relatively poor impression on many people, and many people still say that the shooting effect is not as good as that of the SLR, which is based on the comparison of that period. But the advent of C3 and 5N has changed the landscape completely.

The sensors of the C3 and 5N are the same, the processor is also the same, the main difference is that the C3 has fewer control options, the screen cannot be lifted, and there is no flash, you need to buy a separate flash, and the screen behind the 5N can be flipped up 80 degrees, and there is also a touch selection function, although there is no built-in flash, but the external flash is provided randomly.

Judging from the shooting effect, there is almost no difference between the C3 and the 5N in normal light conditions, but in high ISO shooting, the C3 can be said to be very good (much better than Panasonic mirrorless), while the 5N is amazingly good, except for the Olympus OM-D, there is nothing that can compare with it.

Another drawback of the C3 is that the image is softer when shooting with pure auto. The 5N is also a bit soft (soft, not sharp enough, a bit like Nikon, and the sensor can only be used to realize its potential with RAW or hand control).

F3 is an improved version of C3, but there is a strange problem, when using automatic, all **will be slightly missing**1 3 gears.

5R is an improved version of 5N, but it seems that only the screen has changed significantly. Haven't seen an in-depth comparative review of the 5R yet.

According to DXOMARK's score, 5R78, 5N77, F3 and C3 are both 73 points. That's a pretty good score.

As a professional digital student, think about your lens, whether you want the original or the adapter, which is much more important than the body, after all, the number of lenses in Sony's E-mount is not very large. (You don't think about buying a kit, do you?) ）

I don't understand why I want to buy a micro-single, it's a digital professional discipline, and it's not like that.

It's better for digital majors to buy a DSLR.

It can be simply understood as, card body + SLR lens.

Card machine: easy to operate, lightweight, cheap, easy to control, power-saving, fashionable appearance; The picture quality is average, suitable for general household use.

Single motor: slightly complicated operation, good picture quality, fashionable appearance; Slightly larger, more expensive, and more expensive, suitable for wealthy families.

SLR: troublesome operation; Good picture quality, strong expansion ability, good durability, professional appearance; Poor portability, suitable for hobbyists and professionals.

Due to the lens replaceability and the enhancement of the photosensitive original, the image quality has been improved compared with the general card machine, but it is a bit exaggerated to compare with the SLR. The emergence of this kind of camera is just a business to cater to some ordinary consumers' blind pursuit of card machine image quality, and the psychological requirements of blind worship of interchangeable lenses.

Wash 6 inches** and computer browsing**, 3 million pixels are completely sufficient, and now the cheapest camera on the market can also meet the requirements, so it is recommended that everyone buy a camera not to believe the propaganda of merchants, to consume rationally. It's easy to buy a card with the auction, Miduo has the requirements to buy the bill, there is a learning spirit to buy a single-reflex, and you don't take the money seriously.

Owner NEX-5 with 18-55 sleeve** Around 4100 4300 Two days ago I had a friend who bought it very good.

The NEX-5 should be called a microelectric because it has both a replaceable lens and a card body, and Sony's single electric starts with the A55.

In most environments, the effect of microelectronics is still very good, and its CMOS is also the size of APS-C, which is basically comparable to the effect of SLR.

And it's very small and stylish, and the electronics are also powerful, making it suitable for novices and girls.

The disadvantage is that the micro-electric adopts contrast focusing, and the focusing efficiency is not as good as that of the SLR, especially when the environment is not good, and it is more power-intensive.

In addition, the current lens group of microelectronics is relatively small, and it is expensive, so I don't understand it, so ask again.

Now it is commonly known as single electric, the full name is a single-lens electronic viewfinder camera, and the difference between the SLR is that the reflector is canceled, and the optical viewfinder, so that the volume of the fuselage and the volume of the lens are reduced, but the area of the core image sensor is the same as the SLR, so it does not lose too much in imaging, this kind of camera is also the key research and development direction of major manufacturers in the past two years, and the advantage is mainly to achieve an optimal balance between volume and image quality. . . The disadvantage is that the current lens group of single battery is not abundant. And it's relatively high...

Hope it helps.