Sony NEX 5 Sony NEX 7 Panasonic GF2 Which of these three is better?

Just look at ** to know the nex 7 is the best.

The most cost-effective is of course Panasonic's GF2, and the double-ended sleeve machine does not exceed 3000 pieces.

Personally, I think GF2 has the best appearance.

Forehead... How does a 3000 camera compare with a 10000 camera Definitely nex7 is the best...

Panasonic GF2 with 14-42 lens is about 4600 yuan, Nex5C with 18-55 lens is about 4150 yuan, in addition. Now GF2 is a hot seller. There is a trend of price increases.

The GF2 uses the M4 3 system. The NEX5C uses the APSC system. As far as sensors are concerned.

The sensor of the Nex5C is larger. Therefore, the picture performance will be more pure. With less noise, the available ISO will be higher, but on the other hand, the M4 3 system has more lenses for purchase, including many lenses with excellent performance, and the lens of the A system should be used to rent the original NEX.

To add an additional 1000 to buy an adapter ring. Far behind GF2 (for the time being) on interchangeable lenses besides. NEX does not have hot shoes.

Other flashes are temporarily unavailable. This is a considerable drawback.

Finally, the operation of the NEX system is biased towards amateurs and novices. Perfect for people who want to take photos easily. Whereas, GF2 is relatively professional. Suitable for those who want to learn photography techniques.

Sum up. If you're looking for a good quality shot with ease. You can choose nexIf you are looking to spend a little more money. Go to configure the lens. Photography skills are required. Gf2 can be selected, thanks

Panasonic strikes the spine] wild staring.

Sony] Shooting pose.

Sony, I'm using it, and it works pretty well.

Panasonic GF6 My brother has one,I played for a few days,The response is slow,The automatic capture is not accurate,The screen is not very clear,It feels very general,Sony's one has not been used, and it is not very clear。 The real experience is not coaxing data from online copying.

NEX5 Pros:1All-metal body? Both pullovers are also made of metal!

2.Flip the screen! Personally, I think this thing is very practical, and Sony's flip screen is really exquisite.

3.High sense is good, and GF2 is killed in seconds. In low light, image quality is excellent and noise is low.

Compositing and panoramic scanning, both of which are very useful.

Format!! One lap bigger than Panasonic's M3 4!

6.It can be transferred to any lens, especially all kinds of old lenses, the legendary "all-round".

Cons: 1Pullover garbage. Especially the biscuit head, which was completely killed by GF2's biscuits. . .

2.If you don't use a biscuit head, the camera volume is extremely uncoordinated!! It's a monster.

3.There is no built-in flash, and because the camera is smaller, the flash needs to be external, although one will be sent inside the accessory. But it's not as convenient as the GF2 pop-up flash.

4.It is said that it is not possible to handle garbage... But for someone like me who hasn't used a DSLR. It shouldn't have any effect...

The format is not much better than the M3 4! In the case of low inductance, it is not even as good as M3 4...

Let's talk about GF3

Pros:1The quality of the pullover is higher than that of the nex5, **cheaper, 2It looks retro, and the average person's aesthetic will like GF3

3.The size is small enough, and after hanging the biscuit head, it is almost the same size as the average DC, and even smaller than the NEX5!!

4.Touch screen, easy to operate, focusing, background blur, are easy to operate, suitable for novices!

5.Comes with a pop-up flash, which saves space and is enough to pull the air!!

6.The fuselage is also made of all-metal!

Disadvantages: format, hemibody disability... Congenital heart disease.

2.The display screen is not powerful at all.,Pure seckill by nex5.。。。 The display pixels of this product are not half as high as nex5...

3.There are no hot boots.

Focus, focus, focus! If it's me, just consider GF2! Personally, I feel better than the above 2 Whether it is the appearance or the function! And it's more appropriate!

Turnip greens have their own love. GF3 is relatively lighter. I personally recommend GF3, which is relatively more suitable for girls.

In your case, it's portable, and since there's already a full frame, you should buy a smaller camera from that angle. The G1X is the most advanced and full-featured non-interchangeable lens camera, but it's still not very small, and more importantly, it's ridiculously expensive. And the smaller grades are also one level lower are S100 and S110.

According to user evaluations, these two lenses are prone to failure, and the image quality is not very good, of course, better than ordinary cards. I recommend Olympus' XZ-1, JD 1999 yuan, imaging is no less than Canon G series.

If you think the size of the NEX-5R is acceptable, it is still more convenient to carry with its new 16-50 lens, which is very suitable for your needs, and the image quality is taken to a new level, after all, it is the sensor of APS-C. The cameras of the Panasonic GF series and Samsung's NX cameras are generally not good. Not recommended.

The body of the nex is not very coordinated with the lens, but it is still good to install a fixed focal head, and the image quality file is preferred. G1X, the high is not low. Panasonic's M4 3 lens is more numerous and has more options. I just use the gx1, take a x head out, coordinated and easy to use.

Oh my God, with convenience, you want the GF series with X1442 biscuit heads, and nothing else will be more convenient than it.

Choosing between Nikon J1, Sony Nex5 and Panasonic GF3, I personally think the choice should be considered from the following aspects-

1. The most important factor that determines the image quality is the sensor size.

In general, the sensor area of the Nikon mid-range SLR is 365mm, and the sensor area of the Canon mid-range SLR is 332mm.

With this set of data, it can be used to compare the size of the three mirrorless (microelectric) sensors mentioned above three years ago:

1) The sensor area of Nikon J1 is 116mm, 2) The sensor area of Panasonic GF3 is 225mm, 3) The sensor area of Sony NEX series is 365mm, note that the sensor area of the general card machine (1 inch) is only, don't believe the nonsense that "the image quality of the card machine can be compared with the micro single electric SLR".

Comparison shows that there is no essential difference in the image quality of Sony mirrorless mirrorless and most DSLRs of Nikon and Canon. It was followed by Panasonic and Nikon third.

2. The quality of the matching lens is also directly related to the quality of the film.

1) Each family has a biscuit head, ** belongs to "you get what you pay for", it is basically right to buy expensive, of course, it needs to be the premise.

2) Panasonic's 20mm has the best imaging, and it is naturally the most expensive.

3) Panasonic's 14mm biscuit head, the imaging quality is relatively average.

4) Sony's 16mm biscuit head, the imaging is also average, but **cheap.

3. Other parameters and appearance.

Factors such as appearance and humanization are also very important considerations.

1) Sony NEX 3: Small and beautiful.

2) Panasonic GF3 is suitable for women's small hands, and a variety of colors are available. It is still very affordable with biscuit heads.

Of course, for novices, it is not recommended to choose a prime lens as soon as you get started. Only the zoom head is the best choice for novices.

Conclusion: a. The first choice: Sony nex3, the most cost-effective and cost-effective.

B. Panasonic GF3 camera is also good, but Sony NEX3 can only rank second.

C. Although Nikon J1 is good, it can only rank third because the image sensor of the camera is too small.

If you are cost-effective, you can consider the Sony NEX5C NEX-5N (NEX-5N is relatively expensive, you can consider the former).

Because of the size of the sensor and professional lens, the image quality is the same as that of the entry-level mid-range SLR.

The definition of mirrorless is this meaning - micro and small, the corresponding image quality of SLR, that is to say, this word means that this camera has a small size and SLR general image quality. ）

So don't worry when it comes to picture quality.

Personally, I think the mirrorless is very suitable for girls, and the operation is relatively simple. If you want to shoot the effect of background blur, there is a very convenient operation.

Hope it helps.

I myself use the NEX5R, I think it's pretty good, but it's very painful to take pictures in the scorching sun without a viewfinder and can't see the screen clearly, but the Sony A6000 has a very high rating. It is recommended to choose a mirrorless mirror with a viewfinder, the brand doesn't matter, it's all about the same.

Mirrorless is a card machine that can change the lens, and the image quality is close to that of a high-end card machine, and there is a large gap with a single-lens reflex.

Since you are more concerned about the volume and don't pay much attention to the focal length of the lens, it is better to buy a high-end card machine.

I suggest you take a look at the Canon EOS M2, 2000 price point, dual lenses, and you can also switch to Canon DSLR lenses. Good value for money.

I just got my hands on the NEX-5N and it feels good.

1、NEX-5The sensor area is twice that of GF3,Theoretically it has better image quality,Greater dynamic range and background blur ability,In factNEX5High sensitivity noise control is indeed significantly stronger than GF3,After all,GF3 still uses Panasonic's generation of Live MOS,And the use of the second generation of Live MOSG3,High sensitivity is similar to NEX5;

2. NEX5 Due to the short flange distance, the edge imaging must be relatively poor, and many evaluation articles boil down to the quality of the lens, which is not a problem with the lens, but a problem with the design of the fuselage;

3. The zoom lens of the nex5 is too large and top-heavy, which I personally think is awkward and ugly; NEX5's 16mm fixed-focus biscuit head is of low quality, and the focal length is not easy to use, in Zol's original words, it is "very disappointing", so the biggest disadvantage of NEX5 is the problem of matching lenses, after all, matching biscuits is the king of mirrorless, in order to show the advantages of high image quality + small size;

4. The most cost-effective GF series is undoubtedly GF1, only the 20mm sleeve is now 3000 yuan, but unfortunately it is discontinued; The 14mm sleeve after the GF2 lacks highlights, and the standard change lens is not as lightweight as Olympus. In short, the best thing for GF3 is to hang 20 biscuits, but it costs a lot of money;

5. Olympus E-PL2 can also be considered, with body anti-shake, the set is still relatively lightweight, and the cost performance of licensed goods is slightly higher than that of GF3 licensed goods;

6. Panasonic G3 is currently the most worthwhile single camera to start, although the volume is slightly larger, but it has a better feel and control; The GF series will depend on when it will be able to change to the second-generation Live MOS.

The Nex5C sensor has a large area and better image quality than the GF3, which is designed to be relatively compact.

You can also wait for the NEX5N to come out first, because the NEX5N is definitely better than the GF3. For now, each has its own good, depending on what you are after.

1: Bokeh depends on the lens, and what you are talking about may be the depth of field preview function.

2: The tilt-shift effect seems to have been popularized in mirrorless now, and N5 seems to have it, but it's not sure. You can ask specifically when you buy.

3: Sony's envy sensor is larger than Panasonic's, which is equivalent to the C-frame of a DSLR, so the imaging will be better. Sony N5 is better, it belongs to Sony's mid-to-high-end machine. Panasonic GF5 is the best and is the latest model of the GF series.

Sony's F3 pink Nianda machine is a girl's favorite, super beautiful. You can check it out. Ruler vertical.

In summary, for reference.