Geniuses suffer from mental disorders much higher than ordinary people, why are geniuses and madmen

What exactly is the relationship between genius and madness?

The difference between a genius and an ordinary person is the sensitivity to the things around him, and this sensitivity can create mental disorders and conflicts, a condition that can lead to psychosis if it persists for a long time.

The similarity between a genius and a madman is the sensitivity to things, and this sensitivity can create mental disorders.

In addition, some researchers have cautioned against a fairly common pitfall, which is that correlation does not equal causation. Rothenberg points out that the correlation between having a mental illness and working in the arts, although there may be a genetic cause, may also be the result of people accepting mental illness - a large proportion of mental illness is art, and patients who have experienced these may be more likely to be attracted to art and thus pursue a career.

Probably the only thing that scientists can agree on is that, as the best manifestation of human intelligence, the internal mechanisms of creativity are very complex. Whether from the perspective of cranial nerves or from the perspective of genes, individual studies may only touch the truth side. We still have a long way to go to understand how the human brain creates, and it is only by accumulating new research data that we can get closer to the biological secrets behind "creativity" that they have been searching for.

Serious psychological disorders and psychological conflicts cause people to suffer from mental illness, and what makes people think is that only people who are extremely intelligent and extremely sensitive to things, especially genius people, are most likely to produce intense psychological disorders and psychological conflicts, and if these intense psychological disorders and psychological conflicts persist for a long time, they will naturally lead to the subject's mental illness and finally make him a crazy person.

What kind of talent do you want to be?

Geniuses are just more persistent, decisive in their actions, and acting according to their plans. The pursuit of time is more demanding.

In fact, genius is not mentally ill, at least genius thinks that he is normal, but because the angle and height of looking at the problem are different from ordinary people, they are often not understood, so they are commonly recognized by the public as "psychotic", just imagine that there are a bunch of geniuses together, geniuses will not be lonely, and they will not be recognized as "psychotic".

As a super "genius", the first thing to face is oneself, the unconscious analysis of the sublimation of all things, the various vertigo caused by countless contradictions, the uninterrupted thinking for no reason, and the extremely sensitive perception of the world's time and space, the body and mind must be able to bear it, or why geniuses are generally in extremely poor health and do not live long. "Geniuses" also have to face the outside world, geniuses are not always successful, after all, the world is an ordinary person, if a genius finally resonates with the outside world, he will be respected as a genius; If his talent had not resonated with the myriad factors of the outside world, he would have been sent to a neurological hospital, but without affecting the nature of his "genius". One "genius", many destinies.

If you are very ordinary, you should burn high incense, and you don't have to face so many tortures and so many experiences, so as to achieve the same as ordinary people"Death"The ending.

In fact, there are some possible or other dialogues between the mentally ill and the author, to show the different worlds in the eyes of people who seem to us to be somewhat peculiar.

This book can inspire us to think independently, to observe our whole world from a higher perspective, to think about everything we are accustomed to now, and even to change our three views.

But the people in it are all some of the more powerful mental patients, not the ones who are very stupid. They have their own kind of more solid ideas that are based on reality and seem peculiar in reality, but not all of them are geniuses.

The phrase was originally meant to describe scientists, not geniuses or geniuses in general.

Because of the needs of research, scientists often think wildly, even out of thin air, from ants jumping to rockets, from waterfalls to Mars, without the slightest logic but abiding by certain strict laws.

Most geniuses follow established theories for rational and logical reasoning in order to extend their goals, and they are the ones who follow theory and practice the most.

Therefore, geniuses and madmen are not on the same side, only scientists are willing to say this.

Scientists must be crazy, but crazy people are not necessarily scientists.

Without a crazy brain, you are not destined to become a qualified scientist.

4. Before revealing the fallacy of this sentence, we can interpret it in a more modest way: Tianchang and the madman are like the two ends of a rubber band that is stretched after being disconnected. Disconnect a rubber band at either point and pinch both ends with your fingers.

Two points that used to be close to each other are now in opposite directions, far apart.

Another way I understand "crazy" or "sick" is influenced by my father-in-law. My father-in-law, Dr. Nicollet Ken, is a Russian psychopathologist and the founder of the Volgograd (Stalingrad) Psychopathology Firm. He once said that some patients are actually normal, while some healthy people are not.

What he meant by "normal" meant that a person is sick (mentally), but has an interest in life, cares about others, and has a positive effect, then the person is normal. And if a person is healthy (mentally), but acts like a saboteur and is selfish, then the person is abnormal. This statement is unique.

A person like Van Gogh may be really sick, but it is normal because he produces creative and positive results. And a man like Hitler could be healthy (I personally doubt it), but was considered abnormal, because he was a catastrophic saboteur. I would also add that it is usually not geniuses who go crazy, but society.

This reminds me of King Herod in the Bible, who ordered the slaughter of all male babies in the hope of killing the prophesied future king. Isn't this a crazy move? In another example, Bruno was burned to death by the Inquisition for believing that there were many planets like ours.

What's wrong with him? Galileo was tortured and forced to publicly renounce the so-called "heresy" – the doctrine of the rotation of the earth – in order to survive. After years in prison, Thomas Cannella wrote his utopia ("Sun City") on shredded paper, bravely dreaming of a future society where all people are truly equal.

Socrates was tried and executed for debating young people in the square. This is how society in the past (often insane) copes with the future. Albert Einstein, who is closer to us, survived precisely because he was in a more civilized society; Otherwise, what awaits him will be the same fate as the above-mentioned people.

So, roughly speaking, geniuses have the same odds of being locked up in an insane asylum as anyone else. One thing is different, though: geniuses will be remembered.

And the average person in a psychiatric hospital is ultimately just a medical statistic.