Is it illegal to go without a contract?

If you don't have a contract, you can leave the company at any time. You can go straight after the handover.

If you buy someone else's car, without transfer of ownership or contract, and the seller secretly drives the car away, if it is for the purpose of illegal possession, it is theft. If the amount is larger, it constitutes the crime of theft and should bear criminal responsibility.

According to Articles 23 and 24 of the Property Law, the Ministry of Public Security's Reply on the Issue of Determining the Owner of a Motor Vehicle and the Reply to the Issue of the Time for the Transfer of Property Ownership of Motor Vehicles, the registration of motor vehicles handled by the public security organs is an administrative registration, not a registration of the ownership of a motor vehicle.

Therefore, after the other party actually handed over the car to you, although there was no transfer of ownership, the property rights of the vehicle have already belonged to you, and the other party secretly drove the car away for the purpose of illegal possession afterwards, which constitutes theft.

Article 23 of the Property Law The creation and transfer of movable property rights shall take effect upon delivery, unless otherwise provided by law.

Article 24 The creation, alteration, transfer and extinction of real rights in ships, aircraft, motor vehicles, etc., shall not be used against bona fide third parties without registration.

The reply to the issue of determining the owner of a motor vehicle (Bus Guan [2000] No. 98) reads: "Law Enforcement Office of the Supreme People's Court: Your office has received a letter dated May 23, and the reply is as follows: According to the current motor vehicle registration regulations and relevant provisions, the registration of motor vehicles handled by the public security organs is a registration of permission or disapproval for driving on the road, not the registration of motor vehicle ownership.

In order to meet the needs of traffic management, the vehicle management office of the public security organ shall confirm the owner of the motor vehicle with the vehicle purchase invoice or the legal documents of the people's court's judgment, ruling, mediation, and other motor vehicle origin certificates when handling the vehicle license certificate. Therefore, the owner of the vehicle registered by the public security organ should not be used as the basis for determining the ownership of a motor vehicle. I hereby reply to you.

5 June 2000".

The reply to the issue of the time of transfer of ownership of motor vehicle property (Bus Guan [2000] No. 110) reads as follows: "The Research Office of the Supreme People's Court: Your Office has received the letter on soliciting opinions on the > opinions on how to determine the time of transfer of ownership of motor vehicle property (draft) (Fa Yan 2000 No. 41), and the reply is as follows: According to the current motor vehicle registration regulations and relevant provisions, the registration of motor vehicles handled by the public security organs is the registration of whether or not to allow motor vehicles to drive on the road. Not a motor vehicle title registration.

Therefore, there is no legal basis for taking the time when the vehicle management department handles the transfer of ownership as the time for the transfer of ownership of motor vehicle property. I hereby reply to the letter.