It is said that good people come out of the golden stick , should parents beat their children?

No. The use of violence to solve problems is wrong regardless of the purpose. If you use violent means to force your child to obey you now, he may use such means to deal with others in the future, or he may become a fierce and introverted character, bullying the weak and fearing the hard.

First of all, the common statement of Chinese parents: I am your Laozi, and it is natural for me to beat you. Is it really natural for parents to hit their children?

Ethically speaking, it is the first time for parents to become parents, and it is also the first time for children to be called children, and there may be things that are not done well. But it is unfair for parents to use force to suppress their children when their children are not doing well, because they are the ones with power. Although parents work hard to raise their children, do they owe their parents inherently to their parents when they are born?

No, the child is already an independent individual from the moment he leaves the mother's body, but because the parent's care for the child is necessary for the child, he cedes part of himself to the parental control, and when the child is completely independent, the parents should no longer control the child. <>

Under the performance of control and suppression, it is actually the incompleteness of the parents' personality, after all, they can't use force to suppress anyone when they treat others outside, but for children, ten minutes of violent beating is indeed more time-saving and worry-free than an hour or two of careful preaching.

Let me ask, when parents use force to make their children obey their words because they are the strong party and they are the ones who provide protection and support to their children when they are young, are they not afraid that their children will 'treat others the way they do' when they are old? Doesn't it seem ridiculous to suppress children with "filial piety" when the time comes? Love is never taken for granted, and obedience is not taken for granted.

With "I'm for your good", "Tiger father has no dog, it doesn't matter if you hate me now, you will understand my good intentions in the future." "It's lazy to make excuses for such strong pressure.

I think we should not hit our children, we all know that we know that we have done something wrong, but because of the threats and intimidation of parents, and then being beaten, there will be a rebellious mentality.

Shouldn't. Parents should establish a correct concept of education, communicate with their children in a timely manner, and do not hit their children.

The key lies in whether parents have principles, not whether they should fight or not. If parents have principles and hit their children because they have done something wrong, not because they want to be angry, the child can feel that it is for his good.

No, children can be induced and communicate with children if they are wrong, and hitting children will make children have rebellious psychology and there will be shadows.