Explain the first passage in the Analects, Learn and learn.

Hehe, a very controversial sentence. The first sentence: When I was reading in the past, the explanation in the textbook was "What you have learned, you must keep reviewing it, so that you can grasp the joy of knowledge, and give examples of how a book can be read at different times in life will have different levels of understanding."

Later, I heard a professor from Taiwan speak the Analects in the Hundred Lectures, and his explanation was practice and practice, reflecting a unity of knowledge and action; In context, I agree with the latter, that is, the learned principles should be applied in practice, so that it is fun.

It can be regarded as an attitude of interacting with others, and it is said to contain a philosophical attitude of "seeking common ground while reserving differences", which is probably considered to be the same thing. "People don't know and are not ashamed, and they are not gentlemen? This is very complicated in philosophy, because ancient philosophy is different from modern philosophy, especially many systems of thought, and there are quite a lot of ways to understand this "knowledge" - it can be regarded as "wisdom", that is, not to get angry because of other people's faults; It can also be seen as the meaning of "knowing", as it was written in the textbooks in the past, not being understood and not getting angry; For pedants, they can still tell a lot of meanings, and what they can understand generally depends on the individual, as the so-called "benevolence sees benevolence."

The wise see the wise".

Upstairs is inaccurate.

The problem lies in the use of Western epistemological perspectives to explain the problem of human cultivation.

Learning and learning is to say: after learning the truth of being a man, in the interaction with people, repeated practice, practice, their own life realm continues to improve, the relationship with everyone is getting better and better, to achieve physical and mental harmony, social harmony, this is of course a very happy thing.

The class has an axe, which insults the way of Confucius. Sadness also.

Absurd! Is it possible to take for granted that modern ideas are used to explain the thinking of more than 2,000 years ago? Just like eating, Chinese reflect rice, foreigners reflect Western food, and the cow's head is not the horse's mouth. Many authorities are also difficult to make this mistake.

1. "Learning": Learning 2,000 years ago specifically refers to learning the Tao and self-cultivation, not learning knowledge. Modern knowledge is generally a system composed of scientific knowledge introduced from the West. The two are very different.

2. "Friends come from afar": Friends do not refer to friends but to reason. The metaphorical technique is used here, which refers to the fact that through learning the Tao and cultivating the Tao, many truths go from not understanding to suddenly realizing (isn't it from far to near?).

The joy of learning the Tao is indescribable, and only those who practice the Tao can experience it. That's why it's so much fun!

3. With the explanation of the above two points, and then the two sentences before and after, the whole meaning is not more smooth? Otherwise, three sentences, each speaking its own way, is a bit inexplicable and far-fetched.

4. Paraphrase of connection: Isn't it very happy to learn the Tao and cultivate the Tao and improve self-cultivation? (In the process of learning the Tao and cultivating the Tao), the truth has gone from not understanding to gradually understanding, and is it very happy that the mouth is suddenly opened?

This mysterious state) others don't know and there is nothing to be unhappy about, isn't it a gentleman?

Isn't it enjoyable to learn and review and practice from time to time? Isn't it nice to have like-minded people from afar? People don't understand me, and I don't resent or get angry, isn't I also a virtuous gentleman?

From the original text of "The Analects of Learning":

Confucius said: "When you learn and learn it, don't you also say it? Have friends come from afar, are you happy? "People don't know and are not ashamed, and they are not gentlemen? ”

Translation: Confucius said:"Isn't it also enjoyable to review what you've learned after studying? Isn't it nice to have like-minded people from afar? Others don't understand me, but I'm not angry, isn't it also a morally cultivated person? "