You say, is it really separate for good and bad?

There is no separate good or separate bad in this world, just like a magnet, the two poles exist at the same time. It's just different sides of the same thing. What may be good for you now will be found bad in the future.

For example, now that you have been smooth sailing and have not encountered any difficulties, you think this is good, but compared to those who have come all the way through the ups and downs, you have a lot less opportunities to sharpen, so it is not good for you.

It is recommended that you read the second chapter of the Tao Te Ching.

Hehe, I just read some books this morning, and it seems to be talking about this topic.

It's the conversation between Keiko and Zhuangzi:

Huizi said to Zhuangzi: "The king of Wei has the seed of my big gourd, and I have made a tree, and the fruit is five stones." To hold the water slurry, its strength can not bootstrap also.

If you cut it into a scoop, it will fall into nothing. It's not that it's big, and I'm going to make it useless. Zhuangzi said:

The master is clumsy in using big things! The Song people have good medicine for not turtles, and the world is a matter of water. When you hear it, please buy it.

Gather the clan and conspire and say: 'My world is a lot of money, but a few golds; Today, you will be a hundred gold, please be with it. 'Guest, to say King Wu.

The more difficult it is, the king of Wu will make it a general, and the winter will fight with the Yue people, defeat the Yue people, and split the land and seal it. Can not turtle hand also, or to seal, or not exempt from the ripple, then the use of the difference. Now there are five stone gourds, why not worry about thinking that it is a big bottle, and floating in the rivers and lakes, and worry that it will fall and have nothing to tolerate?

Then the master still has the heart of Peng, and the husband is also a husband! ”

In other words, things don't matter if they are good or bad, different things and things will have different meanings in the hands of people in different realms. A small matter, an irrelevant person, when you meet a person with great wisdom, you can apply it to governing the country and leveling the world. An irrelevant method and common sense is of no use to some people, but to a person with high insight, it can make him become a Buddha with one thought.

The book I read is Nan Huaijin's "Zhuangzi Nanhua", you can also go and see it.

Right or wrong is relative to the time, space, and object to which the problem is addressed.

If the time, space, and object of the same problem are transformed, the properties of right and wrong will be different.

Right and wrong are also relative to the time, space, and object to which their events are directed.

In terms of time frame, what was considered right in the past may not be right now.

What seemed intolerable in the past seems acceptable and understandable today.

In terms of spatial scope, what this country thinks is right, other countries may not agree.

What this country thinks is wrong, other countries may not agree.

In terms of the scope of the object, what is right for this group of people may not be right for another group of people to do the same thing in different times and spaces.

Everything is relative. There is no absolute standard of right and wrong.

Good and bad are opposites and a unified whole. It seems to be dichotomy, but in fact it is one.

The same glass of wine, some people taste it and say it is bitter, and some people drink it and say it is sweet, and there is no absolute standard.

It can only be said on the premise of limiting the specific time, space and scope.

And some things that are favorable in the short term are right, and in the long run they are really unfavorable and wrong.

There is good and there is bad, just as there is good and there is evil, they are inseparable.

Can you be specific, do you mean being a person or doing things, or ?

There is no absolute good or bad in life, and there are shining points in bad people. It's not necessarily that good people haven't done bad things.

If you do things, it is even less absolute. Your intentions are good, but the results are far from what you imagined or even completely opposite, that is, "bad". If it aligns with the purpose you want to get, that is, "good". The reverse can also be said that good and bad are not so absolute.

Genesis: God saw that light was good, and He separated light from darkness. Here's the answer.

There is absolute truth and justice in the world.

Don't be fooled by postmodernism, or you will suffer forever because you don't have an answer; For you have eaten of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.

There is no absolute wrong or absolute right, and what you think is right or wrong at the moment is influenced by your outlook on life.

Good or bad is only a matter of thought.

If you think that good and bad are really separate, then please make a definition of them.

The Chinese traitor in the Australian iron ore acquisition case, you say he is bad, but Australia says he is good. You say, is he good?

This matter is either beneficial to A or beneficial to B, how can there be no interests in it, this is called the third party stubbornness, which is not good. Analyze the problem, you can't do it that way. When you are fake?

Good or bad, you know best, ask yourself, to put it bluntly***, Chiang Kai-shek.