Yi Zhongtian said that Qianlong did nothing good during his reign, what is the truth?

Because when Qianlong was in power, he went down to the south of the Yangtze River many times, exhausted the treasury, and launched several wars.

During Qianlong's reign, he cared about the lives of the people, but as the manager of the country, he was too narrow-minded and failed to consider various issues from the overall situation, so Yi Zhongtian said it well.

Qianlong reigned when Western countries completed the industrial revolution and entered the steam age He is the king of a country It is impossible not to know that with the progress of the productive forces in Europe, human thought has also progressed so that many countries have overthrown the monarchy revolution Qianlong thought of it In order to keep his ancestral business, he chose to lock up the country Others are not important, but this incident directly led to the decline of China To put it bluntly, if he is a far-sighted monarch, then the United States does not dare to let it go now.

There are two figures in this question, one is Yi Zhongtian, a well-known Chinese writer, scholar, educator, and famous historical critic, who has many insights on this aspect of history. Emperor Qianlong, a famous emperor in the history of our country. Of course, Yi Zhongtian is understandable as a historian to evaluate historical figures, but he actually said that Emperor Qianlong did nothing good during his reign?

What's going on here? Let's take a look. <>

In August 2019, when Yi Zhongtian gave a speech at a conference forum, he said amazingly: Emperor Qianlong has reigned for more than 60 years, I don't think he has done anything good, he is a bastard, I don't understand why there are still people who want to praise him! Soon, his sharp remarks aroused heated discussions among the majority of netizens, and even aroused the indignation of the descendants of the Qing Dynasty royal family.

The descendant of the Qing Emperor Nurhachi, Aixin Jueluo Taochi (who called Emperor Qianlong his uncle), thought that Yi Zhongtian was really full of nonsense, provoking discord, undermining national unity, and harming ethnic minorities. So Yi Zhongtian complained to the relevant departments in Beijing. <>

So, why is Yi Zhongtian so disrespectful to the historical figure of Emperor Qianlong? In the chapter "Missing the Great Voyage and Missing Modernization", Yi Zhongtian severely criticized Emperor Qianlong, expressing his dissatisfaction with his national policy of "closing the country to the outside world" and the idea of governing the country "behind closed doors", and also attributed Qianlong to the lag in the development process of China's modern industrialization and modernization. But is such an arbitrary assessment really correct?

The evaluation of historical figures is nothing more than a dialectical evaluation from the historical merits and demerits, there are good and bad, and it cannot be black and white, so Yi Zhongtian is indeed too much. <>

The Qianlong Emperor once put down the Jungger rebellion and maintained the unity of the Chinese nation, and the Qianlong Emperor compiled the "Siku Quanshu", contributed to cultural undertakings, expanded the territory of the country to the largest area, and exceeded 300 million Chinese for the first time; Let the Qing Dynasty be in a hegemonic position. Therefore, Qianlong is still a very meritorious king.

Yi Zhongtian said that Qianlong did nothing good because he felt that Qianlong inherited his father's foundation and did not make the Qing Dynasty develop further, but was content with pleasure and did not want to forge ahead!

Yi Zhongtian believed that the Qianlong Emperor had left China behind the world because of his feudal rule. His point of view is a bit abrupt, saying that he has not done any good things, but this is his own point of view after all, and does not represent all the views of the historiographical circles, and we should treat them politely.

In the eyes of later generations, Qianlong is undoubtedly the most blessed and fortunate in the world, and is even recognized as a "loser" who can only be shaded by his ancestors and only knows how to eat his old books. So this led to some descendants beginning to question Qianlong and discuss whether he had done great things. <>

In August 2019, Yi Zhongtian said surprisingly at a forum meeting: "I personally think Qianlong has not done anything good, he is a bastard, I don't understand why anyone still wants to praise him!" Obviously, Yi Zhongtian's evaluation of Qianlong this time has the characteristics of "straightforwardness", but it is really debatable that he is not a "gentleman".

Soon, Yi Zhongtian's astonishing words aroused heated discussions among netizens, and even aroused the indignation of the descendants of the royal family of the Qing Dynasty. Aixin Jueluo Taochi, the eldest son of the Qing Emperor Nurhachi, a descendant of Chu Ying, believed that Yi Zhongtian's evaluation of Emperor Qianlong was a lie, sowing discord and complaining to the relevant departments. <>

Soon, Yi Zhongtian's astonishing words aroused heated discussions among netizens, and even aroused the indignation of Qianlong's descendants. Aixin Jueluo Taochi believes that Yi Zhongtian's evaluation of Emperor Qianlong is a lie, sowing discord and complaining to the relevant departments. So on June 30, Aixin Jueluo Taochi, a descendant of Aixin Jueluo Luo, submitted a complaint to the relevant departments in Beijing, requesting the relevant departments to investigate and clarify the truth of the matter for the well-known scholar Yi Zhongtian to deliberately slander the Qianlong Emperor, which for a time pushed the Qianlong Emperor, an already controversial historical figure, to the forefront again.

It is true that Qianlong's six visits to the south of the Yangtze River did cost the people money and wasted extravagance, but the new policy implemented by Yongzheng almost offended the vested interests at that time, and he had lost the hearts of the world's leaders, gentry, and literati. If it were not for Qianlong's six visits to the south of the Yangtze River and pacification along the way, the stability of the world would have been affected. Qianlong personally appeased and co-opted the officials, businessmen, and literati in the south of the Yangtze River, so that the people in the Jiangnan region and even the world could see Qianlong's relaxed and benevolent government, otherwise the world would inevitably enter a state of crisis with incessant internal strife and constant external troubles.

So Qianlong didn't do nothing, and Yi Zhongtian directly denied Qianlong, which is indeed a bit too much.

It's not that Emperor Qianlong didn't do good things, but that his good deeds as an emperor are just political achievements. Yi Zhongtian did not insult Emperor Qianlong, but evaluated him objectively!

Qianlong did a lot of bad things, but he didn't do good things, and he still had some merits during his reign. Yi Zhongtian did insult Qianlong, he said that Qianlong had not done anything good during his rule for more than 60 years, he was a bastard, and he couldn't figure out why anyone would praise him. In fact, Yi Zhongtian was too radical because he thought that Qianlong had missed the great voyage and modernization, so he burst into foul language.

None of the 12 emperors of the Qing Dynasty were good things, and they were all purposefully touted.

During the Qianlong period, he granted amnesty to the world and encouraged the development of agriculture and handicrafts, and he pushed the handicraft industry to its peak. These were his contributions during his reign and will influence the next period. I think a scholar can have different opinions, but he can't be extreme, let alone abusive.