The Canon SLR 60D and 600D are more cost effective

Updated on number 2024-05-22
7 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    If you ask about the cost performance, of course, it is 600d, the entry is enough, and it is enough to match a 18-135 head, even if you have 18-200

    Now there is a misunderstanding, that is, everyone pursues a large focal length, so the telephoto camera has reached 40-50 times zoom from the earliest several times to more than ten times, and now it has reached 40-50 times zoom, is it actually really needed? Do you shoot the moon every day? Do you use him to shoot birds every day?

    With a telephoto, everyone is lazy, forgetting that they still have legs, or use the fixed focus head, experience the realm of zoom basically walking, don't forget, the closer to the illuminated object, the better the imaging effect, what do you say? I hope what I said will help you!

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The cost performance of the picture is still 600d, and it is about 10,000 to buy a Canon 5D3 set in one step.

    The lens 18-135 is fine, although the zoom factor of 18-200 is large, but the actual usage rate is not high, or the wide-angle end is more important, and the shooting environment is far more than shooting close-ups.

    If you want to shoot portraits or focus on a large aperture such as 50 or 85 This kind of lens can shoot some sugar water blur and soft**, and the ** shot of one lens around the world is very bland, no sense of impact, in fact, it is higher resolution than the card machine, and the characteristics are basically none.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    The cost performance must be 600d, the lens 18-135 is on the line, 18-200 Although the zoom factor is large, the actual use rate of telephoto is not high, 18-135 is on 600d The equivalent focal length imaging is also better than 18-200 One lens goes all over the world 18-135 is better ** is also good.

    Family travel with such a combination of 600d+18-135 is very good.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Said that the obvious 60D has a shoulder screen, focusing double cross, fast continuous shooting, more robust, faster shutter, and more durable battery.

    But do you think these are useful, but the 600d is also quite good.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Hello landlord 600d is an entry-level machine 60d is a mid-range machine don't look at 60d cheap I think it's almost the same In fact, the gap is not small.

    1. High sensitivity: different positioning causes different light sensitivity levels, that is, high-sensitivity processing, 3-digit machines and 60D cannot be compared, as if 60 and full-frame can not be compared, caused by positioning;

    D has a more delicate operation gear: for example, on the ISO, the 3-digit machine starts from 100, the next gear is 200, and then 400; 60d is also from 100, but there are 2 steps between 100 and 200, which allows us to better adapt to subtle changes in light. For example, shutter speed, etc., the intermediate gear is naturally 60d more.

    3. Material: The plastic box of the 3-digit machine is completely different from the 60d Oh You will be clear when you touch the feel, and there is also a viewfinder, Canon 3-digit camera uses 5 mirrors, 60D uses 5 prisms, so you can know the framing effect caused by comparison.

    4. Operation: The 60D machine has a roulette wheel on the back, while the three-digit machine only has directional buttons, and the design of the 60D is closer to the high-end camera; 60D has a shoulder screen,Don't underestimate this shoulder screen,It's not a little bit of help when you are in quick operation。

    5. Feel: 60D as the mid-end positioning fuselage, the size of the fuselage is larger, which causes the handle to hold better, the author's hand is not large, but the little finger of the 3-digit machine will also be suspended, but with 60 will not, a good grip can reduce the fatigue during use, convenient for long-term use.

    6. Life: As a mid-range machine, both the material and the process are higher than the entry-level machine, and the life of the loss parts of the SLR is also much longer than that of the 3-digit machine, such as the shutter life is almost 2 times that of the 3-digit machine. At the same time, the 60D uses the same battery model as the full-frame, and the battery life is stronger, with an average of 1 battery can complete at least 2000 shutter times.

    7. Parameters: For example, the fastest shutter speed of 60D is 1 8000, and the flash synchronization is 1 250;The three-digit machines are 1 4000 and 1 200 respectivelySeemingly subtle differences are more pronounced in some of the more demanding conditions.

    Overall, because of the different positioning, there is little comparability, and obviously 60d is better.

    As for which one to buy, it depends on your budget and what you want to use it for.

    Generally, a 600d set of home machines is enough, if you want to learn photography, you can't buy a 60d stand-alone machine.

    It's okay to have a set of lenses with 600d, but with 60d, it's a waste of this machine

    The 60D stand-alone camera is now about 4500, which means that you need a budget of more than 8000 to buy the 60D, and I can recommend the lens to you.

    Otherwise, the 600d set is cheap enough for home use.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    From the perspective of equipment manufacturers, 60D is good. The 600d is recommended from a practical point of view. Most of them are the same, pixels, and image quality are no different. It's just that the maximum speed is one gear behind, and there is a difference in continuous shooting speed. The ** processing chip of the 600D is updated, the body is lightweight, and its differences are as follows.

    d has a shoulder screen; 600d does not.

    d. 9-point full cross, ** double cross focusing system; 600d only ** point is a cross d, using a wide and bright glass pentaprism framing; The 600d is only reflex viewed with pentasides, and the d has continuous shooting performance; 600d only.

    d. Have a more powerful and reliable power system; The 600D battery has a small capacity and weak battery life, and it adopts a more durable and comfortable medium-sized body design; The 600D has a compact, small body design.

    In terms of performance, 600d and 60d are not the same grade, there is no comparison, ** is there. If you have money, you can go directly to 60d, there is no suspense; If there is less rice, it is just an ordinary play, then 600d, both machines are very good machines.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    60D is a mid-range machine, 600 is entry-level, a difference of thousands of dollars, not a level. If you don't have to lose money, you can get 60d.

Related questions
10 answers2024-05-22

Merit. 1.The imaging quality is high, although the number of diagonal points is not much, but they are all relatively accurate, especially the ** focus point, which is an eight-way double cross, with high focusing accuracy, and the tracking and shooting of moving objects is very clear. >>>More

4 answers2024-05-22

See the instructions on focusing in the manual. The manual of the SLR is very important. Another is to practice more.

9 answers2024-05-22

If your boyfriend wants to use it in the future, 100D is too small, because 100D is a reduced volume version, the wiring from the sensor to the motherboard is too compact, heat dissipation (thermal noise affects high sensitivity) and failure have not been tested by time, if you only buy one lens, 18-135 is preferred, 18-55 telephoto is too short, if you want to add a lens in the future, you don't have to 18-135, too expensive.

10 answers2024-05-22

I just bought back 60d, and I was very entangled before I bought it, so I deeply understand that the landlord is now choosing a difficult situation. >>>More

2 answers2024-05-22

Alas, the experts did not get to the point at all: this is the product of two companies. >>>More