Which is better Nikon D700 or Canon 5D2? I shoot the most portraits and landscapes.

The 5d2 pixel is relatively high, and the imaging is delicate. The D700 pixel is on the low side, but it has Nikon's traditional sharpness advantage, and the high-noise situation is slightly better than that of the 5D2. In terms of color vividness, I don't think there is much difference.

If you want to print a large **, then you should choose 5d2. If you don't need that, then either will do. I'm using a d700.

For me, there is a very bad reason, the bare metal weight is 810 grams for the 5D2 and 995 grams for the D700, so I deduce that Nikon is not very stingy with materials. Originally, I had heard others say that Canon was more economical in terms of materials (except for the top machines). Haha, this reason is for reference only and is purely a personal preference.

Please choose according to the actual situation.

If you shoot straight out of the portrait Canon is better, the scenery Nikon is better. If the session is good, both are fine. Another 5D2 pixel high, D700 high sense of good.

These two are half a pound and eight taels, relatively speaking, I recommend D700, it still depends on what lens is used.

The 5D2 has no internal flash, no focusing light, and the focusing system is weaker than the D700.

5d2 portrait is better, I prefer Canon's design and overall feeling, ready to start 5d2, 5d2 + (24-70) + 135 , 33400 24-70 has risen very much recently, and I want to start it quickly.

Summary. 18-105 is not unusable, and the dog's head is good.

Landscapes and portraits are basically not taken into account, one with a small aperture and the other with a large aperture. The optical quality of the head of the world is worse than that of 18-105, which is convenient, so it is best not to buy it.

D7000+18-105, just add another one.

How about the Nikon D7000 shooting portraits and landscapes!

18-105 is not unusable, and the dog's head is good. Landscapes and portraits are basically not taken into account, one with a small aperture and the other with a large aperture. The optical quality of the head of the world is worse than that of 18-105, which is convenient, so it is best not to buy it.

D7000+18-105, just add another one.

Now with an AF-SD Nikkor 16-80 F ed VR, can this lens shoot human landscapes? Thank you

You can shoot large landscapes, or you can take a long shot from a distance.

Can I take this shot.

OK. If you learn more photography techniques, you will definitely be able to shoot blockbusters.

I have this entanglement, and if I can, I won't change it. Because the D7000 is half-width.

In fact, sometimes photography plays a bigger role. For example, a good mobile phone can shoot very good works. If you don't want to participate in the competition, publish your work. There is no need to change it.

It's enough to shoot your favorite subject matter and entertain yourself.

should be released, that is, let you consult, buy it and think about it, it's a bit out of place, and I want to change to a practical one that can shoot humanities and natural scenes, if you can, you can rest assured.

Friends said AFS16-85VR, about 4300 looks. If you are a sub-factory, Tamron 17 50VC is good, constant aperture, about 3500.

Well, thank you.

Sorry it may not have satisfied you, I'll try.