Why are there usually contradictions between the first and second leaders?

Updated on workplace 2024-05-10
16 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    The main reasons for the contradiction between the first and second in command are as follows:

    1.The struggle for power.

    2.There is an imbalance between power and duty.

    3.Selfishness and face-playing.

    4.Perceptions are different.

    5.Tricks.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    I still don't understand this.

    The number one has great power and great responsibility. As a human being, of course he wants to have the final say, thinking that why don't you listen to me when you are the second-in-command, and you are not responsible if something goes wrong.

    Although the second-in-command is irresponsible, he will think that his status is stronger than that of ordinary workers, after all, he is second only to the first-in-command.

    You see, the contradiction is out. It is mainly caused by the imbalance between rights and obligations. Of course, some ideas of human beings themselves are also the fuse.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The number one wants to continue to do the current position. 2. Handle the first hand and retreat early, and then make some trouble for him. Of course, there is a contradiction.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Because the first leader decides whether what the second in command thinks is right or not. Say you're right, you're right. It's not right to say you're wrong, it's not right.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because everybody wants to instruct others and doesn't want to be instructed.

    This is one of the root qualities of human hunger.

    The corrosive effect of rights on people.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The first leader has the final say, and the second in command also wants to have the final say.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    This is the usual practice of our party, otherwise it will be difficult to control.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It's also very related.

    None of them overstep their authority to manage other things, this should be the handling of ordinary relationships!

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Is that. Or how to divide it. Managers and assistants. Hehe. right. He doesn't buy it, you buy it. Faint.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Benefits + face = why usually.

    Are there contradictions in the first and second in command?

  11. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    The difference between first and second in command is:

    1. The difference between the essential levels:

    The difference between "first-in-command" and "second-in-command" is first reflected in the level. In general, there is a gap between the administrative levels of the "first leader" and the "second in command". For example, in departmental and bureau-level units, the level of the "first leader" is the level of the main department, while the "second leader" is only the deputy department level.

    In county-level units, the county magistrate is the "number one", and the administrative level is the deputy department level, while the deputy county head is usually only the "deputy department level".

    2. Income differences:

    Typically, the "first-in-command" earns more than the "second-in-command". Because the administrative rank of the "first-in-command" is usually higher than that of the "second-in-command". The difference in administrative level is one level, and the difference in salary is a few hundred yuan, and the difference is thousands of yuan.

    3. Differences in decision-making:

    For the "number one", the most important thing is the decision-making power. When civil servants hold meetings, the "top leader" usually speaks last, because the "top leader" has the "final say." This kind of "final" power is also the real reason why many people aspire to become the "number one".

    Therefore, the sense of accomplishment of the "second-in-command" is of course not as good as that of the "first-in-command".

    Responsibilities of the number one:

    1. In terms of interpersonal relations, the first leader is responsible for the relationship and communication between the various organizations under his leadership, and also the external relations and exchanges of the entire unit. For example, the work objectives of the unit are formulated, the various organizations within the unit are coordinated, and the comprehensive operation is formed to form a whole, and at the same time, the organizational unit is connected with the surrounding environment to establish a network. At the same time, the first leader of the unit is also responsible for encouraging and motivating, training and educating his subordinates, as well as mobilizing the enthusiasm of the employees, leading the employees to form a cooperative and interactive whole, and realize the work functions.

    2. In terms of information resources, the "top leader" is the focus of information collection and release in the unit, and is in fact the "central nervous system" of the organization. First of all, the "top leader" should collect and understand all kinds of external information related to his unit and the relevant information of various organizations and members within the unit, so as to provide a basis for making decisions. Secondly, the "top leader" should also organize and process the information he collects and disseminate it to his subordinates, and guide his subordinates to make decisions within the corresponding authority.

    3. In terms of decision-making, the "top leader" has overall responsibility for the performance of the functions of all parties within the organizational unit, and in order to ensure that the functions of the unit can be fully performed, all the resources of the unit must be fully controlled to adapt to the changes in the environment, so every major decision has a practical relationship with the "top leader". To ensure that the functions of the unit are performed, the "number one" actually controls the unit's right to allocate resources, including the allocation of human, material, and financial resources, as well as the right to decide on honors and commendations.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The difference between the first and second in command is: the first leader pays more attention to the result, and the second in command pays more attention to the process; The first leader is thinking about the overall situation, and the second leader is doing things concretely; The first leader is responsible for formulating the strategy, and the second leader is responsible for the specific implementation; The first leader is responsible for leading employees to make dreams, and the second leader is responsible for leading employees to realize their dreams; The first leader guides the direction of the employees, and the second leader leads the team to work concretely.

    As the number one person in managing a collective, the number one person thinks about the difference between good and evil. Under normal circumstances, the number one leader especially respects and cherishes his own collective, and the interests of the collective are equal to the interests of the number one leader.

    The good should be carried forward and persistent, and the evil should be discarded. The second-in-command is reluctant to think like this in his heart, as the second-in-command, it is more about bowing down to his ears and putting the wisdom of survival in an important position. The first leader thinks about channeling and rallying the strength of his subordinates, and the second leader thinks about the majority of people being consistent with the first leader.

    The pattern and thoughts of the two are not at the same level at all.

    The essence of management is to figure out human nature, water can carry a boat, can also overturn a boat, the leader is very clear, he must study the needs and expressions of his subordinates, understand the needs of human nature, will gather people's hearts and strength. The second-in-command is naturally executed, and will not pay attention to the humanity and needs of his subordinates, but will only figure out the thoughts and intentions of the first-in-command.

    Here is also a warning to those young people, if there is something to go directly to the leader, only the leader will pay attention to your vital interests and needs. The second-in-command is a troublemaker in the unit, confusing the public, deceiving the superiors and subordinates, and only caring whether the first-in-command nods, whether he is satisfied, and whether he acquiesces.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    What position is the second-in-command you are talking about? The number one represents this unit! Take full responsibility!

    The general duty of the deputy is to assist the first person in charge! One hand on one! There are multiple sub-positions!

    Don't think so badly of the deputy position! Do what you have to do! Being able to be a deputy is also a top leader who is more satisfied!

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The difference is that the first leader can have the final say in everything, the second leader is the good one, and the bad one has to bear it.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The difference between the first and second leaders of the company, standing in the wrong position, no matter how you do it, it is wrong.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The difference between the eldest and the second.

Related questions
25 answers2024-05-10

There are two types of plant pollination, same-pollination and cross-pollination; Among them, cross-pollination mainly relies on insects to transport pollen, which is called insect-borne flowers; Those that rely on wind to transport pollen are called wind-borne flowers. 1.The characteristics of adaptation to wind pollination are: >>>More

14 answers2024-05-10

A rookie is someone who is new to the internet. The corresponding ones are old birds and prawns, which refer to people who are proficient in the Internet. And so on and so forth, such as dried shrimp (what), porridge (like), soy purple (like this), table (don't), and so on. It's all the language of the web in the online group.

19 answers2024-05-10

The cracks in the rocks on the mountain are formed by weathering over many years of wind and sun.

12 answers2024-05-10

The main thing is that people with this kind of face are suitable for investment, symbolizing wealth, and the catering industry is relatively easy to do.

13 answers2024-05-10

A: This phenomenon reflects the cumbersomeness of the judicial process. >>>More