Recommended headphones below 400!!!!!!!!!!

Updated on number 2024-05-15
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    K420 is more omnivorous, which is very good. Because there are not many options available at this price. K420 is good in every way.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Sony's E888 is the first bio-diaphragm headset that works well. And Senhai's CX200 is also good, Senhai's this is in the ear, and the prices of these two models are around 270. Choose one of the two of about 300.

    No matter how expensive it is, it is generally unacceptable. If you are more expensive, you will get the Sony EX310, and if you have rice, you will get the EX510. If you need me to recommend you again.

    Or you just go to the mall and actually listen to the effect before deciding.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Watch animation, listen to OP, ED, Philips' boiled water headphones are just right. These OP, ED, animation, movies, voice actors, and other voice coloring are very large. Recommended SHP8900, **300 or so can be bought licensed.

    The likes of AKG K420 can only be considered toys in front of this machine.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Watching animations, listening to pop songs, and playing games, the best choice is Beyerdynamics' low-end headphones DT131. Not high, but strong. The performance of female voices is even more nuanced.

    Other models, such as the K420 and HD201, can only be considered toys in front of the DT131.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    How about the Audio-Technica AD300. It's just a head-mounted one!

    AKG K99 is not bad.

    The portable one has Audio-Technica ATH-FC700

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Japanese songs?

    The bass of Japanese songs is very heavy, and I listen to Ayumi Hamasaki a lot.

    So the first choice is Sony's XB series, XB is for bass bass heavy rock and hip-hop are perfectly displayed in the front end of XB, but the mid and high tones play averagely, and the low frequency is generally 5.

    The consideration range of 500-1000 is very large The head-mounted style and the sound quality is the XB700 masterpiece I use this one, and I cook it very well.

    Now there are a lot of XB series withdrawals, but I still push the XB700 with a very comfortable carry, but don't use the --- heat in the summer.

    Check out Sony's XB series in detail, I believe it's what you want.

    Secondly, I will give you another alternative.

    Not many people know about this one, but the reason I recommend it is a very comprehensive machine, the JVC-H5M

    The xx shape comes from American street culture, and the look is really stylish, and the bass is not as deep as Sony, but the mid-to-high is much more open than Sony's.

    It's good to push, I suggest you take a look, it won't be buried in the crowd.

    Tianlong D1100 This is good, but Tianlong's headphones are not 5000 can not reflect the advantages and effects of Tianlong, Tianlong's wooden shell is classic, the echo effect is quite good, the sound field of the middle and high tones is very luxurious, but the headphones below 3000 yuan can not be reflected, and, there is no Sony headphones to push.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Since it's a Japanese song, use Tenryu's D1100, which is OK to listen to Japanese songs, Tenryu's low frequency and low voice are very transparent.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    1.There is a principle.

    The low-end system of audiophile headphones sets the tone with headphones, which means that the different styles of headphones will determine the difference in your final listening effect, relatively speaking, *** is secondary, so if you pursue sound quality, you can choose a headphone with better sound quality (below 400 yuan, no matter how high it is, there will be certain requirements for your **device).

    2.These three are portable headphones,Relatively speakingPX80,PX90 is more focused on bass,If you prefer bass strong enough, you can consider these two,But I personally don't recommend it,Because audiophiles generally don't consider headphones that are too heavy on low frequencies (in fact, it may be that the bass is strong enough,But the low volume is too big to overshadow the singing vocals,The vocals are not heard clearly,And the damage to hearing from headphones with strong bass is also relatively large)Compared to HD202 is more balanced, It doesn't overly highlight the bass, and it should be the most cost-effective choice among the three (if I remember correctly, HD202 has been famous abroad**what.)

    Hi-Fi rated 5-star headphones (5 stars is the highest level, of course, the premise is in the same price range), it is recommended that you buy HD202, and these three are no problem for your ***, all of which can be driven well. Of course, if you grit your teeth and increase your budget to 400, you can consider buying igrado, which is an extremely popular headset in the audiophile circle, and it is very cost-effective, suitable for popular male voices, rock and roll, etc.

    The same is what

    Hi-Fi's five-star product.

    The sound quality is better than the three you mentioned above, and it's basically no problem to use it.

Related questions
4 answers2024-05-15

Qixiang 9600GSO 384M DDR3 Invincible Superman 2 **399 parameters: graphics chip GeForce 9600GSO chip manufacturer NVIDIA >>>More

7 answers2024-05-15

Sennheiser MX985, IE60 Virtue.

And Audio-Technica CKS99 is also good. >>>More

11 answers2024-05-15

A lot,400 within HIK's D1 headset is very cost-effective,Into a dormitory will not leak sound,It's comfortable to wear,The main thing is that the sound quality is good。

10 answers2024-05-15

Headphones below 1,000 yuan are worth recommending, including 100 million color Bluetooth headsets, which are very durable, and there are some original configurations, famous brands, which are very easy to use, and I like them very much.

3 answers2024-05-15

magus?Looks like hype. In the case of Bose, the sound quality is average, but the three frequencies are relatively positive, and the noise reduction ability is very strong, but it seems to be over budget.