What was the Conference of Versailles, what was the essence of the Conference of Versailles?

In January 1919, the Allied Powers convened a meeting at the Palace of Versailles in Paris to discuss the disposition of the defeated countries. The meeting was rigged by the heads of state of Britain, France, and the United States. The victorious powers quarreled fiercely over their own interests for more than five months, and it was not until June that the Treaty of Versailles was signed with Germany.

A spoil-sharing conference held after World War I.

The essence of the Versailles Conference: the spoils of the imperialist conference to re-divide the colonies and divide the spheres of influence after the war.

The Paris Peace Conference was a product of the First World War, a meeting of the imperialist countries to arrange the post-war world order, and in essence it was a conference of imperialist spoils. The First World War was essentially a conflict of interests between the imperialist powers over spheres of influence and colonies.

In Imperialism as the Highest Stage of Capitalism, Lenin, through a large number of materials and rigorous academic analysis, proved that this war was "an imperialist war on both sides, a war for the division of the world, for the division and re-division of colonies, the 'spheres of influence' of finance capital, and so on".

After World War I, the United States, Britain, Japan, and other imperialist countries proposed to convene an international conference to re-divide their colonies and spheres of influence in the Far East and the Pacific. Also known as the Pacific Conference. Held in Washington from November 12, 1921 to February 6, 1922.

Delegations from the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and Beiyang** of China participated. The Washington Conference was essentially a continuation of the Paris Peace Conference (1919), the purpose of which was to resolve the conflict of naval power and interests between the imperialist powers in the Far East, the Pacific, and especially in China, which had not been resolved by the Treaty of Versailles, and to improve the post-World War I imperialist peace system. The conference proclaimed the abolition of secret diplomacy, but in fact all major issues were discussed and decided by the meeting of heads of delegations of the United States, Britain, France, and Japan, and sometimes France was also excluded from the United States, Britain, Japan, and other imperialist countries after World War I, in order to re-divide the colonies and spheres of influence in the Far East and the Pacific, an international conference was proposed by the United States.

Also known as the Pacific Conference. Held in Washington from November 12, 1921 to February 6, 1922. Delegations from the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and Beiyang** of China participated.

The Washington Conference was essentially a continuation of the Paris Peace Conference (1919), the purpose of which was to resolve the conflict of naval power and interests between the imperialist powers in the Far East, the Pacific, and especially in China, which had not been resolved by the Treaty of Versailles, and to improve the post-World War I imperialist peace system. The conference advertised the abolition of secret diplomacy, but in fact all major issues were discussed and decided by a meeting of the heads of delegations of the United States, Britain, France, and Japan, and sometimes France was excluded. After World War I, the United States, Britain, Japan and other imperialist countries convened an international conference proposed by the United States in order to re-divide the colonies and spheres of influence in the Far East and the Pacific.

Also known as the Pacific Conference. Held in Washington from November 12, 1921 to February 6, 1922. Delegations from the United States, Britain, France, Italy, Japan, Belgium, the Netherlands, Portugal and Beiyang** of China participated.

The Washington Conference was essentially a continuation of the Paris Peace Conference (1919), the purpose of which was to resolve the conflict of naval power and interests between the imperialist powers in the Far East, the Pacific, and especially in China, which had not been resolved by the Treaty of Versailles, and to improve the post-World War I imperialist peace system. The conference claimed to abolish secret diplomacy, but in fact all major issues were discussed and decided by the meeting of the heads of delegations of the United States, Britain, France, and Japan, and sometimes France was excluded, and the treaties signed and the resolutions adopted at the Washington Conference constituted the Washington system. This system, based on the recognition of the superiority of the United States, defined the imperialist system of international relations in the Far East and the Pacific, which was not included in the Versailles system, and was complementary to the Versailles system (see Paris Peace Conference (1919)).

But it did not eliminate the contradictions between imperialism. Since then, the competition between the United States and Japan in the Far East and the Pacific has intensified.

1. The essence of the Versailles system is the imperialist spoils of the conference.

2, because it only temporarily eases the contradictions between the imperialist countries.

That's what the history teacher said, the knowledge of the second half of the third year of junior high school).

Substance: imperialism re-divides the world order;

A few days ago, I was chatting with a friend, I don't know what to say, my friend said I was "Versailles". At that time, I was at a loss, and I didn't know how to "Versailles".

As a result, I suddenly wondered what "Versailles" meant.

Later, I gradually forgot about this matter, probably because I had less contact with network incidents!

Later, I heard about the "celebrity" incident, and then the word "Versailles" came into view. Actually, I still don't know what it means. However, at this point, I have paid attention to the article about "Versailles".

After paying attention, I found that "Versailles" is a low-key show-off, or a normal life that seems to others to show off. In short, "Versailles" is about showing off.

The show-off here is mainly divided into two situations: one is that the mold spike himself takes the initiative to show off, but this kind of show-off is a bit like saying the opposite, as if saying: "This car is not expensive, only 20 million!"

Another situation is that one's normal life is a kind of show-off in the eyes of others, just like the life of a real celebrity, which is a kind of show-off in the eyes of ordinary people.

These two kinds of ostentation are actually just a shadow in themselves, and the real prototype is a kind of ridicule or ridicule of social psychology.

Interestingly, "Versailles" became a popular social culture, and in the process, the archetypal events that constituted "Versailles" have been deconstructed and replaced by the common ridicule or ridicule in the process.

Why is there such widespread ridicule or ridicule? It's because of the need for psychological adjustment.

The serious and solidified class differentiation leads to the psychological imbalance of the people at the bottom, and out of the need for psychological adjustment, psychological imagination and release are carried out through a ridiculing or ridiculed way of "Verne Annihilation Psi".

On the other hand, the more popular the "Versailles" phenomenon is, the greater the class differences and estrangement. However, the advantage of the existence of "Versailles" is that it relieves the tension between classes to a certain extent in such a way, which is conducive to social harmony.

This is what I colloquially understand as "Versailles".

At the Versailles Conference, the United States had nothing to gain except that Wilson's proposal for the creation of the League of Nations was adopted. Therefore, the role of the United States in the van-China system cannot be underestimated. The United States was the first to propose the League of Nations, which was also a great political idea of Woodrow Wilson**, but what Wilson ** did not expect was that in March 1920, the US Senate, which was controlled by the Republican majority, refused to ratify the Treaty of Versailles, mainly on the grounds that the League of Nations Covenant formed part of the Treaty of Versailles, and the United States could not accept the control of supranational forces.

This reflected the fear of some in the US ruling circles at the time that the League of Nations would be controlled by Britain and France, and that it would only hinder the United States from pursuing an expansionist policy. The basis for their worries is that after World War I, although Britain and France were seriously weakened and the United States became the richest man in the world, the international pattern of Europe's center that had been formed for centuries had not been completely broken, and Britain and France still played a major role in international affairs.

In addition, in the United States, isolationist ideas have always prevailed. As a result, the Senate has been opposed to the creation of the League of Nations. This attitude led to the rejection of the Treaty of Versailles as a whole, and the United States did not join the League of Nations.

The United States tried to control other countries by establishing the League of Nations in order to achieve its ambition of world hegemony, but due to the opposition of Britain and France, it failed to achieve its original goal, and the defeat of the United States showed that the traditional Britain and France still dominated the world. At the Washington Conference, the United States obtained a series of rights and interests, including sea supremacy, equal to that of Britain. It is the biggest beneficiary.

The increase in the position of the United States is mainly due to the fact that the United States made a windfall in the war and prospered economically. Britain and France, on the other hand, have changed from creditor countries to debtor countries. Recession.

Intending to be the hegemon, he put forward the 14-point principle of advocating a balance of power on the European continent in order to contain Soviet Russia.

Damien, a wanderer, takes in Enzo, a 5-year-old boy who has been abandoned in the woods of Versailles. The man and the boy who depend on each other for their lives gradually establish an inseparable complex. Versailles is the rich area of the rich in Paris, and the details of life in the slums truly reflect the strong contrast of the living environment in France.

The atmosphere of compassion and sincere outpouring brought tears to the eyes of countless French audiences.