-
And not a dollar less.
The waiter's calculation was wrong, he was confused by the accounts, and he confused many questions The correct calculation should be: 25 yuan from the boss, 3 yuan for returning students, 2 yuan for the waiter and 30 yuan (the initial payment of the three students).
Or: 25 yuan charged by the boss 2 yuan taken by the waiter 27 yuan (the actual payment of the three students).
-
The algorithm itself is misleading, because it should have been spent by 3 people.
The boss took 25 yuan, and the 2 yuan for the waiter is.
-
The upstairs one is right!! The boss charged 25 yuan, 2 waiters, not just 3 * 9 = 27 plus 3 yuan per person returned to 30 yuan!!
-
Analyze it this way: the money they paid is a total of 3*9=27, where it comes from"27+2"???The boss charged 30-5=25, and the 2 pieces that were worse were the waiter's. Your 27+2 is the key to fooling people
-
The three of them spent a total of 27, the boss took 25, and the guy took 2 yuan, which adds up to exactly 27 yuan.
-
A total of 27 yuan was spent, 25 yuan was spent on eating, and the waiter was tipped 2 yuan
-
Deliberately inducing people. Isn't there a 27+2 in it? It should be 30-25-2=1*3
There is nothing wrong with that, that is, the money is in the boss.
-
A total of 27 yuan was spent, 25 yuan was spent on eating, and the waiter was tipped 2 yuan
I agree with this statement.
-
A total of 27 yuan was given, 25 yuan was spent on eating, and 2 yuan was taken by the waiter.
-
Definitely at the boss's.
-
This 1 yuan is not counted in the 27 yuan at all, and it makes no sense to add it together.
-
The boss charges 25 yuan, the waiter 2 yuan, and refunds 3 yuan. Add it up to 25 + 2 + 3 = 30 (yuan) That's right!
-
It's actually very simple! If you are asked how many numbers there are from zero to 9, you may say that it is 9, but in fact it is 10, it is so simple, think to yourself!
-
Not on them anyway.
-
It should be 3 * 9 = 25 + 2, how can the money spent and the money received be added together.
-
They paid a total of 27 = 25 (boss) + 2 (waiter).
-
At the waiter's place, he was one of them.
-
What's the problem?,It doesn't seem right.,The boss charged 25 yuan.,2 waiters.,Isn't it just 3*9=27?。
-
Categories: Entertainment & Leisure >> brain teasers.
Problem description: Xiao Ming saw a pair of shoes for 97 yuan, and he had no money. So he borrowed $50 from A and B. After he bought 97 yuan of shoes, he put away the remaining 3 yuan, one of which was a volt key element, and then returned A and B for one yuan. Then Xiao Ming owes A and B 49 yuan each.
Now add up the 49 yuan of A and B to 98 yuan, plus Xiao Ming's one yuan is equal to 99 yuan, which 1 yuan went to ** cracking? Analysis:
3 divided by 2 equals.
Xiao Ming should first lack the source and return the 3 pieces to A and B.
97 divided by 2 is equal to yuan) and then returned to A and B.
One yuan is still with Xiao Ming.
-
1) Three people live in an inn, and the result is 10 yuan per person, a total of 10 3 = 30 yuan.
2) Each person returned 1 yuan, that is, 9 yuan was spent per person, and the three people spent a total of 27 yuan. In the 27 yuan, the old sleepy clear board left 25 yuan to mark the cheats, and the waiter left 2 yuan privately.
3) Add the 3 yuan returned, and the result is exactly 30 yuan.
Conclusion: This question confuses people mainly because it separates the 2 yuan from the 27 yuan, and the algorithm of the original question mistakenly believes that the 2 yuan left by the waiter is not included in the 27 yuan, so there is a mistake of less 1 yuan Wang Zeqian result; In fact, the 2 yuan left without permission was included in the 27 yuan, plus the 3 yuan returned, and the result was exactly 30 yuan.
It's a kind of trick-like subject, if you follow his train of thought, you will only be puzzled, but a little bit of thinking will reveal the mystery. First of all, the 9 yuan spent per person has included the 2 yuan hidden by the waiter (that is, ***25 yuan + 2 yuan hidden by the waiter = 27 yuan = 3 * 9 yuan), therefore, when calculating the composition of the 30 yuan, the 2 yuan hidden by the waiter should not be counted, but the 1 yuan returned to each person should be added. Namely: >>>More
If I had a dollar, I would buy food! Then go apply for a job! >>>More
**The account is related to the individual, so if it is purchased with a bank card**, the money is in the bank card ** account, which can be viewed in the mobile banking, or you can go to the bank's smart teller machine to view, etc.; If it is purchased with Alipay or WeChat, etc., the money is still in Alipay and WeChat, but after ****, the money has been transferred to the **account, so only after selling**, the money can be returned to Alipay or WeChat. >>>More
The difference is: one yuan twice is cheaper, and two yuan is more expensive once. >>>More
In Beijing, it is not easy to work very hard.