Is there anything that proves that idealism is wrong

Faced with a bud, you think in your heart that the flower will bloom, will the flower bloom?

Is it superficial? It's a famous quote from an ancient Chinese idealist, you know?

When the textbook talks about the fundamental differences between materialism and idealism, Wang Yangming and Berkeley are regarded as typical idealists. About Wang Yangming, there is such a passage in the textbook:

Wang Shouren of the Ming Dynasty was a typical idealist. Once, when he went on a spring outing with a friend in the suburbs, he said: "When you don't see this flower, this flower will die with you; When you come to see this flower, the color of this flower is understood for a while, and you know that this flower is not outside your heart.

That is to say, when the eyes are open, the flowers are bright, and when the eyes are closed, the flowers are lonely, and the color does not exist objectively. Wang Shouren's discussion focused on one point, that is, he advocated that "there is nothing outside the heart".

Of course, there have been doubts that people have misunderstood what Mr. Yomei meant.

When Wang Yangming said that there is nothing outside the heart, he did not take the heart as the ability to know and the object as the object of understanding, and separated the two. What he means is that mind and matter are completely connected, and that the two are not opposites, but united. Since the heart is directly united with all things in heaven and earth, the way of heaven is the fundamental principle of all things in heaven and earth, and it is consistent with the fundamental principle of human nature as human beings.

The reason why heaven is the way of heaven is the reason why the heart is the way of the heart. According to this kind of thinking, to know the way of heaven, you only need to know your own heart. Therefore, the process of knowing is the process of self-experience.

Wang Yangming said that there is nothing outside the mind, in order to further draw the conclusion that "there is no reason outside the mind", and through emphasizing the active role of the mind, he denied the ontology outside the mind, such as heavenly principles and heavenly ways, and turned the rational ontology of science into the ontology of the mind, which is the promotion of people's cognitive ability and human subjectivity. Wang Yangming believes that only the human heart can give meaning to all things in heaven and earth. Following this line, when you go to Wang Menhouxue, there will be the individual freedom of Wang Gen, Li Zhen and others, which will play a role in emancipating the mind.

His ideas had a great influence on the later Japanese intellectual circles, and the ideological emancipation in Japan indirectly led to the Meiji Restoration in Japan.

If you want to prove that idealism is wrong, I suggest you take a look at the book "Nietzsche and Postmodernism", where the author's point of view is very unique and proves this point of view in different ways. You can take a good look at it.

Idealism is not a simple thing in philosophy. You need to dig into it yourself. If it is really wrong, you think, how can it be repeatedly tinkered with by some philosophers for so many years? exists, there must be a reason and part of the rationality.

Isn't the endless exploration of science and the tireless exploration of society and thinking just a good illustration? Isn't the process of these explorations the process of understanding objective things? If it is idealistic, then human beings will not be confused, and there is no need to explore.

Faced with a bud, you think in your heart that the flower will bloom, will the flower bloom? Shallow.

There are no absolute errors and positives.

Indeed, materialism is recognized because it is verifiable, and everything has two sides, so it should be viewed in two.

1. Introduction to Idealism: Idealism, also translated as Theory of Ideas, is the discussion and view of the relationship between ideas, hearts, languages and things in philosophy. Idealism is one of the two basic schools of philosophy, and it is the opposite of materialism.

On the basic issues of philosophy, it is a philosophical school that advocates the primacy of spirit and consciousness and the secondness of matter, that is, the existence of matter dependent on consciousness and the existence of matter as the product of consciousness.

2. Introduction to materialism: that is, materialism, Marxism believes that materialism is one of the two basic schools of philosophy, which is opposed to idealism, and advocates that matter is the first nature, spirit is the second nature, the origin of the world is the material, and the spirit is the product and reflection of the material"。A fundamental view of ontology in philosophy.

Between consciousness and matter, matter determines consciousness, consciousness is the reflection of the objective world in the human brain, and the objective world is independent of consciousness.

3. Personal opinion: No one in history has ever said that idealism is wrong, and no one has the ability to prove that idealism is wrong. Materialism is now pursued, as long as it is in view of the verifiability of materialism.

Logically speaking, there are no logical holes in both materialism and idealism. In reality, the central problem of materialism is that it cannot give a rational origin of matter. The problem with idealism is that it cannot prove its logic by the means that we can see.

Talk about some philosophical questions.

1. Philosophy: A fundamental view of the world. It is a systematic view of the universe, which studies the nature of the universe, the general law of the evolution of everything in the universe, the position of man in the universe, and other very basic questions.

2. The two camps of philosophy: idealism PK materialism (no doctrine can escape the category of these two camps).

A materialism: matter is primary, consciousness is secondary. Everything is from the material. Energy comes. Consciousness is simply the complex evolution of brain nerves (matter), and how exactly it is formed is not known and cannot be answered.

b Idealism: Consciousness is the first nature and the second nature of matter, that is, consciousness precedes the school of material philosophy.

3. Question "Who am I?" The answer?

aMaterialism: I am a body, living in the material universe, small, humble, conditioned. If the body is gone, you will die, there will be no reincarnation, there will be no past life and future life, people die like a lamp going out, and when they die, they are gone.

b Idealism: I am the infinite ontology of consciousness, awareness itself. The body, the world, is all an illusion of consciousness, the content of consciousness. I have not been born or died.

4. On the issue of "death".

A materialism: When the body dies, the "I" is gone. Fear, pain, fear, dying struggle, "I" don't want to die, oh my God, "my" thirty years of mortgage has not been paid off, the car loan has not been paid off, "I" is just gone?! A short life is so meaningless.

bIdealism: I have not begotten, neither have I died. I will accept the manifestation of all phenomena that come and go, and I am the immovable being. Everything is a divine manifestation of Brahman (consciousness).

5. Perception of "objects".

It's better to give an example, such as you have an apple in front of you