What evidence does it have?

There is no evidence that you exist. Because if there is, the evidence must first exist, and the existence of the evidence needs to be proved by other evidence, and the other evidence we need to prove whether they exist. So the evidence needed is endless.

So we can't be sure of whether we exist or not. But if we assume that we exist, we come to the opposite conclusion that we will one day prove that we exist. The key is to see if LZ can understand the contradictory coexistence of the two.

So it's possible that you and I and all the other people don't exist.

The veracity of our existence is always questionable.

In the same way, no one can prove that they exist.

In the same way, no one can prove that any object exists.

In the same way, no being (such as aliens or gods) can prove that anyone exists.

In the same way, no being (such as aliens or gods) can prove the existence of any object.

Even aliens or gods can't prove their existence.

If one day you see them claiming to prove themselves, oh, have pity on them, they are deceiving themselves.

Westerners say, I think, therefore I am. Orientals say that only consciousness is always there.

You have, as Westerners say, that you are still thinking and still being able to think, which is proof of existence. According to the Orientals, your ability to discern your surroundings is proof of your existence.

I don't know what kind of experience you had to go through to ask such a deep question. I hope you are a person who has been through a lot, otherwise you may not understand me.

It's both real and illusory. There is no clear boundary between the real and the unreal in the universe in the eyes of some intelligent beings, and they can already transform any illusory thing into an entity, and can also make an information backup for any entity in case of emergency.

For them, the difference between real existence and ethereal is no longer the difference between hardware and software, but the difference between 1 and 2.

If they define their "realism" as 5, then the "realism" of their computer-simulated intelligent life and the world in which it lives is 4, and if these simulated lives use computers to simulate some kind of intelligent life, the "realism" of these simulated intelligent lives is 3.

If the first intelligent life was also simulated, the "realism" of those simulants would be 6

As long as you are aware of the existence around you, you have already proven your existence.

Moreover, you not only exist now, but will always exist, only the way you exist.

Alas!!! Control your fantasies!! Do everything with your heart and you won't ask such boring questions.

When the self denies the value of its own existence, the self does not exist.

What a profound question!

I think, therefore I am!

Haha, you're too humorous, how about using the anyway method?

You're here to post so you're there haha

Does it matter that there is and does not exist?

Do you feel pain when you pinch yourself hard? It's just painful.

If there is no suffering, how can one prove one's existence?

Only pain is a feeling that cannot be shared, pain, a way of feeling physical pain with great clarity; At the end of the pain, people can experience a subtle sense of happiness more than usual.

I'm probably the type of mountaineer that professional mountaineers hate the most: not only inexperienced, but also incompetent; Not only lack of competence, but also lack of self-knowledge; The only thing that is there is enthusiasm and vanity that induces enthusiasm.

Before I went to El Prussia, my only mountaineering experience was the summit of Mount Kilimanjaro. What impressed me the most was the rush at the moment of reaching the top. The fatigue in the process of rushing to the top makes it difficult for people to get excited when they stand at the top, and they are worried that the weather will change suddenly and they can't stay for a long time, so they basically stand on the top of the mountain for a while, take a few photos, and then they have to climb down and retreat, which is completely different from the style I imagined to look at the mountains and give up my own.

I once climbed Kilimanjaro with Wang Xiaoshan and the old wolf, and Uncle Xiaoshan at that time roared in pain at every step of the way, and I walked in horror ahead of him, as if I had strayed into some murder scene. - I have a lot of confidence in climbing this time, he can't reach the top, I may be able to; If he can make it to the top, I'm sure I can.

Why do people climb mountains? The standard answer is: because the mountains are there.

But whether people climb or not, the mountains are there. So mountaineering is not about mountains, it's about people. For me, mountaineering is about finding a sense of presence.

Descartes said: I think, therefore I am. I think it's because he hasn't used a smartphone or been to Apple's headquarters, and the development of technology will make independent thinking probably no longer exclusive to human beings.

Only pain is a feeling that cannot be shared, pain, a way of feeling one's physical pain with great clarity; At the end of the pain, people can experience a subtle sense of happiness more than usual. How can one prove one's existence? I hurt, therefore I am.

To prove that you really exist, you have to observe your breath, your heartbeat, and your thoughts, which are your thoughts at this moment. People are always only in the present moment, and if you feel the breath, the heartbeat, the thoughts of the moment, then you exist. The past is forever the past, and the future is becoming the present without stopping, but unfortunately the present moment is just this moment, and this moment immediately becomes the past again.

Therefore, to prove your authenticity, you can only prove it from the present moment, and you can perceive this moment to prove your real existence.

Be able to shine for the place where you are, have a harmonious relationship between the upper and lower levels, take the initiative to protect all the things of the unit or team, give full play to your role, send warm love to everyone in the unit or team, and show the charm of your biggest pattern.

You don't need to prove it, it already exists, and if you really want it, you can go to the police station to prove it.

Pinch yourself to see if you feel pain, if you feel it, if you feel it, you are real.

Slap yourself in the face, see if you feel pain.

Legal analysis: if the evidence is sufficient and meets the standard of proof of knowledge, the existence of facts is determined; Minimal or no evidence denies the existence of facts; If the evidence is insufficient, does not meet the standard of proof, is ambiguous, and cannot be affirmed or denied, the facts are determined according to the allocation of the burden of proof. Therefore, there is only the problem of finding the facts wrong and correct, and there is no problem of unclear facts.

But if you have to prove it, you need to bear the burden of proof.

Legal basis: Several Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Evidence in Civil Proceedings Article 3: Parties have the responsibility to provide evidence to prove the facts on which their own litigation claims are based or on which they refute the other party's litigation claims, and where there is no evidence or the evidence is insufficient to prove the parties' factual claims, the party bearing the burden of proof shall bear the adverse consequences.

Summary. Dear, I am glad to answer for you: proof is medical evidence, and legal form evidence, and case investigation evidence.

Proof is not a statutory form of evidence, but based on the current situation that unit certification is still commonly used in judicial practice, different types of unit certification can be treated differently before it is regulated by legislation. 2.Unit certification is not a statutory form of evidence A unit certificate is not a statutory form of evidence – neither documentary evidence nor witness testimony.

Dear, I am glad to answer for you: the evidence that proves that it belongs to the medical Li Zhi's search, and the evidence of legal form, and the evidence of the case filing and investigation. Proof is not a statutory form of evidence, but based on the current situation that a single historical certificate is still commonly used in judicial practice, different types of unit certificates can be treated differently before they are regulated by legislation.

2.Unit certification is not a statutory form of evidence A unit certificate is not a statutory form of evidence – neither documentary evidence nor witness testimony.

Legal basis: Article 44 of the "Regulations on Optimizing the Business Environment" The certification matters shall have a basis for laws, regulations or decisions. The principle of true necessity and strict control shall be adhered to in setting matters of proof.

For those who can be covered or replaced by other materials through statutory licenses, statutory documents, written notification commitments, internal and inter-departmental verification, network verification, contract vouchers, etc., and cannot be investigated and verified by the rubber mill and the issuing unit, no certification matters shall be set. **The relevant departments shall publish a list of certification matters, listing the basis for setting, the requesting unit, the issuing unit, and the handling guide. Outside the list, ** departments, public enterprises, institutions and service organizations are not allowed to ask for certificates.

Mutual recognition and sharing of certificates shall be strengthened between all regions and departments to avoid repeated requests for certificates.

Summary. Glad your question, the evidence that can be used in civil litigation is a testament.

Glad your question, the evidence that can be used in civil litigation is a testament.

Extended information: The legal provisions on the validity of evidence include: In the process of conducting a court investigation on the legality of evidence gathering, the people's procuratorate shall prove the legality of the evidence collection.

Where the existing evidence materials cannot prove the legality of the evidence gathering, the people's procuratorate may request that the people's court notify the relevant investigators or other personnel to appear in court to explain the situation. Legal basis: Article 59 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China: In the course of conducting a court investigation into the legality of evidence gathering, the people's procuratorate shall prove the legality of evidence gathering. Where the existing evidence materials cannot prove the legality of the evidence gathering, the people's procuratorate may request that the people's court notify the relevant investigators or other personnel to appear in court to explain the situation. The people's courts may notify relevant investigators or other persons to appear in court to explain the situation.

Relevant investigators or other persons may also request to appear in court to explain the circumstances. After being notified by the people's court, the relevant persons shall appear in court.

The following evidence can prove the fact of beating: 1. The party's statement on the fact of beating; 2. Charge receipts and medical records of the hospital's ** wounds; 3. Audio and video recording of the scene. Evidence is the basis for proving the facts (of the case), and all the facts that prove the true situation of the case are evidence.

Article 50 of the Criminal Procedure Law: All materials that can be used to prove the facts of a case are evidence. Evidence includes: (1) repentance of physical evidence; (2) documentary evidence; (3) Witness testimony; (4) The victim's statement; (5) The criminal suspect or defendant's confession and defense; (6) Appraisal opinions; (7) Records of inquests, inspections, identifications, investigative experiments, and so forth; (8) Audio-visual materials and electronic data.

Evidence must be verified to be true before it can be used as the basis for a verdict.

Legal analysis: In the process of judicial proceedings, the evidence provided by the parties must be true and valid, otherwise it will not be able to prove the facts. Therefore, there are specific circumstances where the authenticity of the evidence needs to be proved.

Legal basis:1Article 64 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "the evidence provided by the parties shall be true, lawful and effective." ”

2.Article 84 of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates: "Evidence shall be true, lawful and sufficient to prove the facts of the case. ”

3.Article 34 of the Administrative Litigation Law of the People's Republic of China stipulates that "the evidence provided by the parties shall be true, lawful and valid. ”

To sum up, the parties must ensure the authenticity, legitimacy and validity of the evidence when providing it, otherwise the acceptance will have a serious impact on the trial of the case.