Rewarding the anchor spent all his father s life saving money, why does this happen so often?

Now the live broadcast industry is very popular, it can be said that it is an easy and high-paying career, and it is an opportunity for many young people. Personally, I like to watch live broadcasts, but I won't give gifts to the anchor, because I don't think it's interesting, let the anchor thank you if you give money, I'm poor, I don't think I can afford this. Sending gifts to anchors is a function of the live broadcast platform, and the number of gifts can be selected, and the most expensive unit price is more than 1,000 yuan.

Smartphones are becoming more and more popular now, and many children are also using them, and cheap smartphones are very cheap. Many children are not very mature in their own concepts, and I don't think they have a deep understanding of reality. Because I saw the anchor's operation or a certain behavior, it was on a whim, just like the ancient palace maids dancing to the emperor, and the emperor would reward money when he was happy, I think this behavior is very similar.

Children don't know the joy of earning money, especially for some families with average living conditions, so they don't know much about money, and they gave the money to save their father to the anchor, I think the anchor should also return the money to the family according to the actual situation, after all, it is life-saving money. I think that when a child grows up, he will definitely regret it when he thinks about it, because I think he will feel guilty when he knows how difficult it is to make money.

Nowadays, many live broadcast platforms only need a mobile phone number to register, and some ways to charge money are also very simple, you can charge on the official WeChat, or you can charge directly in the app, no ID card is required, and there is no actual restriction on age. I think those live streaming platforms should set a 18-year-old to give gifts, and other similar restrictions. Of course, I think the parents of those children should also know more about their children, do not tell their children the bank card payment password, and also know more about their children.

When I was a child, I had to focus on studying, and I had to play less with my mobile phone or something.

First of all, we are not talking about the situation where the rich spend a lot of money, and the rich can spend it as much as they want, and we can't understand it! We are talking about the working masses, laughing at the situation that the subject's question is talking about.

I think there are several reasons for this:

1.Indulge in the game and live in an illusory world. Nowadays, many young people are addicted to the Internet. After work, in addition to eating and sleeping, playing games, surfing the Internet, in addition, he may not be able to distinguish between southeast and northwest.

2.Real life is a failure, and comfort can be found in the network. There are such people around me, in their thirties, who have not yet started a family.

Overall, he is idle and lives by working as a temporary worker. Therefore, his relatives and friends looked down on him. When he has time, he plays games, surfs the Internet, and rewards the anchor, saying that the anchor likes him very much.

Live in the online world.

3.Homeschooling failure. These people have been able to get to the point where they know the world today, because of the failure of their parents' education.

These people have been pampered since childhood, and their parents would rather suffer themselves than let their children work. Such children, when they grow up, do not have the consciousness of sharing the burden of the family for their parents. Despite the poor family conditions, he also has to spend a lot of money.

Freezing three feet is not a day's cold, such a person can come to this point, and his parents have suffered it themselves. It's not nice to say, but it's true.

Willing to reward your hard-earned money to the anchor may involve the following psychological factors:

1.Social Identity: Viewers may feel identified with the charisma and talent of the anchor or the values that the anchor represents, and will be willing to pay for it.

2.Emotional projection: Viewers may project their own emotions onto the streamer, believing that the streamer's success is their own success, thus generating a sense of satisfaction.

3.Social pressure: Viewers may tip because of social pressure, such as seeing other viewers tipping in the live broadcast room, and they will follow suit, so as to avoid being perceived as "stingy".

4.Psychological motivation: Viewers may feel motivated by the streamer's performance, believing that the streamer's efforts are worthy of support, and are willing to reward them.

5.Vanity: Viewers may feel that their presence is recognized by the streamer because of their tipping, resulting in a sense of vanity satisfaction.

To avoid this kind of psychological prolific birth, the following points can be considered:

1.Rational consumption: Before tipping, you should think rationally about your financial situation to avoid affecting your quality of life because of tipping.

2.Self-awareness: Understand your own values and consumption concepts, and don't blindly follow trends or be influenced by social pressure.

3.Maintain objectivity: Maintain an objective attitude and don't project excessive emotions onto the anchor, thinking that the anchor's success is your own success.

4.Establish the right social relationships: Establish healthy and equal social relationships, and don't expect to be recognized or otherwise rewarded by the streamer for tipping.

5.Enhance financial awareness: Enhance your financial awareness, learn to consume rationally and plan your finances, and avoid affecting your financial situation because of tips.

In short, to avoid this kind of psychology, it is necessary to maintain rational thinking and objectivity, establish correct social relationships, and strengthen finances.

1. The child "sky-high" rewards the anchor and spends all the parents' hard-earned money, theoretically the money should be returned, but if they want to get the money back, the parents must provide evidence to prove that the behavior of swiping the gift is operated by the child himself.

2. According to the laws and regulations of our country, the contract concluded by a person with no capacity for civil conduct and a person with limited capacity for civil conduct is invalid. Incapacitated persons refer to incapacitated persons such as infants, mentally ill persons and persons with Alzheimer's disease, and the contracts entered into by such persons are completely null and void. The situation for persons with limited capacity is slightly different.

3. Legal provisions: Article 19 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

Minors over the age of 8 are persons with limited capacity for civil conduct, and the implementation of civil juristic acts is carried out by their legally-designated ** or with the consent and retrospective consent of their legally-designated **; However, they may independently carry out civil juristic acts that are purely beneficial or that are appropriate to their age and intelligence.

Article 20 of the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China.

Minors under the age of eight are persons with no capacity for civil conduct, and their statutory ** persons ** mountain ** carry out civil juristic acts.

1. Is it a fraud for the anchor to induce gifts?

Whether the anchor's inducement to swipe a gift is considered fraud depends on whether it has the constitutive elements of the crime of fraud, and if so, it constitutes fraud.

The constitutive elements of the crime of fraud are:

1. The object of infringement is the ownership of public or private property.

2. Objectively, it is manifested in the use of fraudulent methods (fabricating facts or concealing the truth) to defraud a large amount of public or private property.

3. The subjective aspect is manifested as direct intent and has the purpose of illegally occupying public or private property.

4. The subject is a general subject, and any natural person who has reached the legal age of criminal responsibility and has the capacity for criminal responsibility can constitute this crime.

Article 266 of the Criminal Law is the crime of fraud.

where public or private property is defrauded, and the amount is relatively large, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment or life imprisonment is to be given, and Li Juzhong is to be fined or have his property confiscated. Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.