Jay Chou was photographed with surveillance, what is the specific situation?

Jay Chou went out to eat in a restaurant with friends, and the person in charge of the restaurant used a surveillance camera to film Jay Chou**, which violated his privacy, and Jay Chou spoke out.

In fact, it was mainly because Jay Chou went to a very down-to-earth restaurant to eat, and then was monitored by the boss.

Jay Chou was photographed dining in a restaurant, and the waiter in the store filmed the picture in ** out of curiosity and surprise, and couldn't help but share it with his friends around him, Jay Chou himself was very angry when he learned about it and complained on Weibo.

When Jay Chou was eating at a restaurant, his footage in the restaurant's surveillance was screenshotted, and the footage was posted on the forum.

Because Jay Chou went out to eat with friends, he was photographed by a surveillance camera in a restaurant, and then the restaurant uploaded the picture captured by the surveillance camera to social **, and this behavior of the restaurant is also very disgusting.

This does infringe on the artist's portrait rights. There is surveillance in the restaurant itself, and it is normal for guests to be photographed by the surveillance. But the fault is that the waiter retrieved the monitoring and sent the monitoring ** to others.

This kind of behavior is very inappropriate, and it also exposes other people's privacy, even if it is an ordinary person, it should not be **.

Yes, viewing the surveillance itself is not an infringement of other people's portrait rights and privacy rights, but it is illegal to publish it on the Internet without the permission of others, causing trouble to others.

Jay Chou was photographed with surveillance, which is disrespectful to Jay Chou himself, but it is not a crime of infringing on portrait rights. Article 100 of the General Principles of the Civil Law of China stipulates that "citizens enjoy the right of portraiture, and without their consent, they may not use their portraits for profit." And in this matter, the clerk did not use Jay Chou ** to make a profit.

Jay Chou's fame can be said to have never diminished, and it is getting higher and higher, as a male singer and songwriter in the Chinese music scene, it can be said that he is a talented person, and he is a particularly talented and powerful person. Over the years, the songs he has created have also been loved by a lot of people, and Jay Chou's songs can be heard everywhere on the streets. He is usually also very low-key, an approachable star, very popular with everyone, and now he is also the father of two children, and the family has always been very affectionate, how many people can't envy him, he has always been very gentle, but recently launched a fire on his social platform, what is going on?

Recently, a message about Jay Chou being photographed by the store's home surveillance was exposed on the Internet, at first it was just Jay Chou dining at a pasta restaurant in Taiwan, but because he was very low-key, the store and the clerk did not recognize it as Jay Chou at that time, Jay Chou was also very happy, and also posted his own relevant things on his social platform, which means that Taichung is also the place where he once held a concert, and he is very nostalgic and happy to come here again. <>

Because of this post, the store found out that it was Jay Chou through the comparison of monitoring, and he met Jay Chou but didn't know, afterwards, the waitress in the store posted the surveillance picture on the Internet, but this made Jay Chou very unhappy, so he posted another post on his social platform, this time directly with a series of question marks: Who can help me ask what it means to take pictures with surveillance??? What does it mean to take a picture with surveillance???

Is this what a restaurant should offer? Help guests take pictures with surveillance? This behavior of the store is disrespectful to the customer and violates the artist's portrait rights.

After that, the store also knew the seriousness of the matter, and hurriedly apologized to Jay Chou, saying that the clerk did not expect to attract attention. Ask Dong Chou if it's not good to take a group photo, you have to find monitoring. This is a violation of the rights of others.

did not infringe on the artist's portrait rights, because no one used Jay Chou's portrait to make a profit.

Legally, this is a serious infringement. As a public figure, he has his own unique portrait right, and he is placed on a social platform without his consent, and it is also on the ins certification platform of the hotel, which has constituted an industry behavior on the side, so it is an infringement.

No apologies, really not.

The first one is the ** from the concert two days ago, and there is no big change, but I am just married.

The second is the homepage of Jay Chou's post bar, updated at any time**.