The outlook for the Nikon D40, the Nikon D40 and the D50 and D60 are good

This friend, I also own a D40, I have been looking at the Internet and the market for half a year before buying the pocket, I think the D40 is indeed a good camera worth having!

First of all, Nikon is a professional and long-established camera brand, and only Canon can compete with her at the moment, and of course German cameras do not count.

Second, D40 technology is mature, there is no camera and other messy things mixed in, which shows its professionalism, the only deficiency is the head 18-55, but the entry is enough, when it comes to the theme, the landlord has now accumulated a lot of photography experience, and it can be equipped with a fixed focus head to consolidate and strengthen the level of photography.

Third, 6.1 million pixels are absolutely enough, as long as the imaging is good, the color is good, and we don't engage in commercial giant photos, why do we need thousands of pixels?

That's right, it's not bad.

What is good, enough is good.

However, it is inevitable to upgrade the machine in the future.

Small 4 where to do a standby machine is definitely suitable.

For now, you have to use it, and the lens must be matched.

But try to match the full-width lens, and the small 4 can also be used, and the upgraded full-frame can also be used.

I have an AF-S 70-300VR for my telephoto

If you're a photography major, change cameras.

If you want to take pictures in general, D40 is enough.

The picture quality of the D40 is definitely much better than that of the normal DC.

The new header is in DX format.

Fixed focus? Don't use it unless you get used to it and want to enjoy the convenience of shooting.

You should have other zoom heads, and if you do, don't buy this.

The lens still retains its value, as long as Nikon does not change the mount, so it has little impact.

I think a 50 is enough.

The D50 has a fuselage motor, and it is a 5-point focus, which feels better than the D60, but after all, the machine is old, and the noise resistance and other aspects are not as good as the D60. If there is still one on the market, D50 is recommendedBut there is a good chance that there are only second-hand ones.

D40 and D60 are still D60 in comparison. However, neither of them has a fuselage motor, so it feels very chicken!

d60 is not a color, a prime of life, are very right from this **!! There is no motor anyway, there is an autofocus lens, what are you afraid of! The key to the camera is color, the function is enough, the lens upgrade 55-200 is not expensive, it is very right for your money, so D60 is a good choice, Canon EOS450D is also good, ** more expensive than D60, and the function is more than D60, but the color is not as pure as D60, so stand in the perspective of color, and ** angle, choose D60,, if you stand in the perspective of function, EOS450D, and Sony

A300 is available.

Additional note D40

D50 pixels are really not good, D50 is discontinued, or D60!

1.The body is well made, feels excellent in the hand, and is easy to use.

2.The LCD screen of the machine has a prominent display effect.

3.A number of processing functions can be implemented in the machine.

4.The image quality is good.

5.The price is very competitive.

1.Compared with similar entry-level DSLRs, the pixels of the sensor are slightly lower, and if it is tens of millions of pixels, it is perfect;

2.AFS lenses can only be used, which greatly affects its flexibility in use, and players have fewer lenses to choose from.