The people were the people who made the constitution, right?

It is of course right that the people are the people who make the constitution of the agreement, because although the constitution itself is nominally made by the people, it is not the people who execute it.

Yes, the framers of the constitution definitely needed the participation of the people, that is, the people!

Although the customizer of the agreed constitution is said to be the people, it is decided by the people's congress, and this is the people's congress deputy.

Hello, I think that's right, generally speaking, it's um, elevating the will of the people to the level of legal consciousness um, so to speak.

Yes, the people of the whole country, the Congress.

All the good ones are the people, and the people have formulated them.

The people were the people who made the constitution, right? That's right.

Yes, this must be true, just do what you think.

The makers of the constitution who made the decision are very fair and just to the people, and I think that all the constitutions are very fair and just to the people.

l Telecom style is really the people, right? I think it should be right, according to his constitutional provisions, it can still be ordered.

Each of us citizens has those who have violated the law and committed crimes in accordance with the Constitution.

According to the difference of the designated organs, it is divided into the King James Constitution; Constitution of Agreement and Constitution of the People's Constitution. Tuan resistant.

King James Constitution: Any constitution made and promulgated by the monarch is called a King James Constitution. Constitution of the Empire of Japan of 1889.

That is, the King James Constitution.

Constitutions by agreement: Constitutions made by agreement between the monarch and the National Assembly are called constitutions by agreement. The constitution of 1830, which resulted from the agreement between Louis and Philippe and the National Assembly, is the constitution of the agreement.

Constitution of the People's Republic of China: All organs of national representation (the National People's Congress.

A constitution that has been emptied of the constituent organs or adopted by a "national vote" is called a popular constitution. Our country belongs to the people's constitution.

Minding. The King James refers to the emperor's agreement, and the agreement refers to the emperor and the people together. We are now socialist, of course, it was ordered by the people.

When necessary, power may not be constrained by the Constitution, this sentence is wrong, and no organization or individual may have privileges beyond the Constitution and laws.

According to Article 5 of the Constitution of the People's Republic of China, the People's Republic of China shall govern the country according to law and build a socialist country under the rule of law. The state upholds the unity and dignity of the socialist legal system.

All laws, administrative regulations, and local regulations must not contradict the Constitution. All state organs and armed forces, all political parties, all social organizations, and all enterprises and institutions must abide by the Constitution and laws. All acts that violate the Constitution and the law must be investigated.

No organization or individual may have privileges that go beyond the Constitution and laws.

I don't think it's right, the prince is guilty of the same crime as the common people. If power is greater than the law, and power is above the law, then the state will be chaotic, and the powerful will not be bound by the law and can do whatever they want.

The power of any person must be constrained by the Constitution at all times. So what you're saying is wrong.

But from the point of view of the rule of law, this is certainly wrong.

However, the law has also been improving, and the original intention of the people's legislation is not to be cocooned and self-bound.

If there is a "absolute necessity" to violate the Constitution, as you are talking about, then it is still possible.

After all, practice is the only criterion for testing truth.

Power is unconscious. It's like a Mustang lost its reins, lost its steering wheel, and didn't say anything special. Today you are special.

Tomorrow is a special thing, so that the criterion is lost, so the power must be carried out within a certain framework. It must be bound by the Constitution. Just like today.

Many people are left unchecked. There will be so many unjust, false and wrongful convictions, which is why the cost of power crimes is too low. Why don't you do something wrong?

This is certainly wrong. The Constitution is above all else.

Wrong, the language of the general absolute is wrong.

I think this behavior is wrong!

Hello, there is a saying called "special affairs", and in case of accidents, it can be handled in accordance with the way and situation "special".

In a society governed by the rule of law, power must be constrained.

Nor can power exceed constitutional constraints.

Look what it is. That's a very meaningful question!

In terms of which aspect of this, special circumstances are special.

a Magna Carta of Liberty in England, 1215

b Constitution of France of 1830.

c 1908 Outline of the King James Constitution of China

d Constitution of Japan of 1889.

Correct Answer: A, C, D Comment: A is not a Constitution, C is a constitutional document, and D is the King James Constitution.

The Magna Carta of Freedom is a statute, not a constitution, an outline, that is, a non-constitution, is a constitutional document, and the Japanese constitution is a King James Constitution, so a, d, c

The crux of these three models lies in the difference in the organs that promulgate the constitution.

1. The King James Constitution, as the name suggests, is a constitution promulgated by the emperor.

The typical representative is the Meiji Constitution of Japan.

It is a constitution formulated by the monarch in lead in order to protect his own interests and at the same time want to develop the country.

Now except for the Saudis.

and other countries, basically no longer have such a constitution.

Its advantage is that it can alleviate social contradictions to a certain extent.

The shortcomings are that the interests of the powerful are taken care of, the center is the monarch, and the remnants of bad habits are serious.

2. A civil constitution is a constitution formulated and adopted by an organ composed of direct votes (referendums) of the people or representatives elected by the people (such as constituent assemblies and representative bodies). In terms of content, the constitution of the people generally adheres to the constitutional principle that sovereignty rests with the people, and the constitutions of most countries in the world fall into this category.

The greatest advantage of the People's Constitution is that it is clear and easy to follow, easy to understand, and supported by the majority of people.

The disadvantage is that it is not easy to revise and ignore the interests of a small number of people.

3. The constitution of agreement refers to the constitution formulated by the monarch in consultation with the people or the representative organs of the people. Woo Ji Bridge modern constitutional monarchy.

This model is mostly used by the state.

The merit of a constitution of agreement is that all classes can be taken care of, regardless of size.

The disadvantage is that it is not well integrated with reality, and it is easy to detach from reality.