The man was beaten at the funeral for singing Today is a good day , is he right?

The man sang "Today is a good day" at the funeral After such a thing appeared, it also gave us a certain understanding of the beating he was beatenAfter all, for funerals, many families are sad for it, and if they choose to sing such a festive song, isn't that also looking for a fight? In fact, he has a lot of times, we should learn to pay attention to these things, after all, what he does is also a harm to the family, isn't this just to make things worse for them, in fact, he is not wrong about these songs a lot, but for the wrong occasion, it will also cause a series of shadows to others, for these problems should also attract a series of attention, do not let others bear certain consequences because of their own recklessness. This is also an extremely irresponsible performance, and we should pay attention to such a thing.

After all, if such a thing happens to you, then what kind of psychology do you have? I believe that no one wants this to happen to them. <>

It would have been a sad thing in such a situation, but here you have caused such a consequence because of your own negligence, which is also an irresponsible performance. Although it is a bit inappropriate to say that this way of beating her is a bit inappropriate, but there is also an angry attitude towards the time, and here, the root cause of everything they did is still caused by the difference in the song they sang. <>

For such a man should also attract a series of attention, although he beats people is an irresponsible performance of your life safety, but your practice is not extremely irresponsible for his family, such a worse situation, in fact, it is a big blow to everyone, after the loss of their dearest people, you have to go through such a thing Isn't it also a heavy injury to them? <>

Of course he was at fault, singing good days at a funeral was disrespectful to the deceased.

He was wrong, and it was clearly out of place to choose this song on a day when all loved ones were so grieving.

There is a mistake, the deceased is the greatest, this is a saying that has been passed down in China for thousands of years, this is the respect for the deceased, the family of the deceased is sad enough, and he still sings songs that do not fit the occasion at the funeral, it is indeed time to educate.

Singing a good day at someone else's funeral is a problem with character, and if you are beaten, you really deserve it.

The man was accused of singing "Today is a good day" at the funeral and was hit with bricks, and the beater was sentenced to one year and eight months in prison.

Isn't this just looking for a fight? How can such a cheerful song be sung on such a solemn occasion as a funeral, which is more like a mockery for the family of the deceased! It's certainly hard to bear, so it's reasonable to be beaten!

But the truth doesn't seem to be as simple as you think.

Singing is a personal freedom, but at someone else's funeral, the atmosphere that should be sad is not appropriate to sing "Today is a good day". Although the man who sang was at fault, he should not be beaten with a brick, and although the beater in this case has a tendency to violence, the masses should also take this incident as a warning to themselves, think twice before acting, and do not harm others and themselves because of the impulse of the moment.

The bereaved family itself is in grief, and you go to sing this kind of song, which is a typical touch of porcelain, and it is not beaten.

People should have compassion for their funerals, but on the contrary, the beaten people added fuel to the fire, singing that today is a good day. Why did people offend you, what is the sea of snow and deep sorrow, you are singing Today is a good day. Look for a fight.

The beater was emotional at the time and hit the beaten person with a brick, but the shot was too heavy and the person was slightly injured, which should not have been. Obey the law. Learn lessons.

When I was happy and mourning, the village really ordered this song.

How can some people explain that they even danced all kinds of exposure dances at white ceremonies? I don't understand.

It is against the law, and the singer is guilty of "moral cultivation".

It's definitely not right to hit someone, but in this case, I will fight if it were me

Saying that the beater is impulsive is afraid that he has not experienced the death of a loved one, don't use your empathy or imagination to measure that kind of grief, it is not the same thing at all! If someone sang this song at my mother's funeral, it wouldn't have hurt my eye, and I would have gone for his life!

Sure enough, there are more saints on the Internet, a loved one has died, and someone else sings a good day at the funeral, so you still have to go up and reason with him?

If you really sang this song, it shouldn't be, no matter how you say it's a funeral, how can you sing this kind of festive song, it's definitely not right to hit someone, and it's normal to hurt someone's left eye, and the sentence is normal.

I think this is very surprising, first of all, the behavior of the man who sang is really excessive, and he should be strongly condemned, and the person who hit the person did have a reason, and he should be punished but not punished.

It is certainly not right for a man to sing this song at a funeral, it is a matter of personal quality, he did not touch the law, and the beater directly attacked the man with a brick, such an act violated the law and will be punished, warning us that we should think twice at all times, otherwise we will have to pay for our mistakes.

I think this matter is particularly problematic for both of them, and no matter how you do, you can't hit someone. The one who sings is not a good person, so it's good for everyone to be more restrained.

Personally, I think that the man's behavior is very inappropriate, very disrespectful, and it is excusable for the beater to beat people, but it is always wrong to beat people, maybe he can educate others in a different way at that time.

I think this man is at fault first, violating etiquette, and the beater is too impulsive.

In any case, beating someone has already constituted a criminal offense, that is, an illegal act, and it must bear the corresponding responsibility, and when encountering this kind of thing, you must first calm yourself down and deal with it in a peaceful way.

The following group of fools don't understand the situation and talk nonsense.

It is not family members who beat people, but outsiders, idle. Of course there is a penalty.

Whether it is appropriate to sing this song or not, the family members themselves will see what to do. There is also a joy and mourning in rural funerals, people die to go to heaven, at the beginning is sad, in the middle is joy, and finally send off and then sad, and when the third anniversary is not necessary, it is joy.

I think that both of these people are at fault, and both the singing and the beating are definitely at fault.

When other people's families were very sad, the man came with a few words of good luck, and he didn't know what he wanted to do, and the family prevented him from singing this song, and the man didn't know how to repent at all, and said very strongly that he wanted to sing this song.

When he said this, the family members attending the funeral couldn't bear it anymore, so they beat the man violently, showing no mercy to his subordinates.

In the end, the man who beat the person was also punished by the law, his behavior must be wrong, the man just sang a song, and did not commit any very serious mistakes, if he was beaten violently in this way, it was the fault of the beater, that is, for whatever reason, it was the fault of the beater, in this case, the beater was indeed sentenced, and he was quite heavy.

In fact, if the beater was not used to this incident at that time, he could have called the police at that time, and used the power of the police to take away the man who made trouble at the funeral, and there was really no need to beat people on the spot, otherwise, the gains outweighed the losses, but fortunately, the person who was beaten was slightly injured, and nothing happened Otherwise, the beater would have been even worse.

Such people simply deserve to be beaten. People are still in the pain of losing their loved ones, but some people are happily singing about good days, are they cheering for the dead? Emotional intelligence is extremely poor, and there is still no quality!

It can only be said that this person did it to himself, and sang a good day at the funeral, which is insulting the deceased.

The funeral is originally a relatively heavy atmosphere, and people should treat it with the right attitude, and the song "Good Day" should be played at a festive time.

I think this kind of person should be beaten violently, because singing such a song at a funeral is disrespectful to the deceased.

It's really unreasonable to sing a good day at a funeral, but it's not advisable to beat someone, and using violence to solve the problem will only bring more trouble to yourself.

Retaliatory behavior, he may have some kind of hatred with someone in the family or with certain people. It could also be that you took the wrong medicine.

The man who was beaten thought he was doing it unintentionally. The beaten man told ** that he didn't know that someone else was holding a funeral today, and **this song** was also his own unintentional act, and there was no intentional behavior.

You really deserve it. The kind of sad thing that people do, you go to sing "Good Day", which is obviously looking for trouble, and you deserve to be beaten.

I think he really deserves it, and his behavior makes it seem as if he is very happy about the death of someone else, and his moral quality is a bit low.

The man's behavior was indeed inappropriate, he really did not respect the deceased, and the beating was not advisable, it was too extreme, and force could not solve the problem.

In such a serious and sad scene as the funeral, it is really not right to sing "good days", the man who sings is at fault, but he will not beat him with a brick, this thing makes us take caution, do not be impulsive in everything, think twice.

I think this man deserves to be beaten, because in our concept, the funeral is a sad atmosphere, and he sang "good days", so he was not wronged at all.

First of all, let's briefly restore what happened, the person involved in this matter, Li, is from Qinghe County, when he went to attend the funeral, he heard others singing good days, and he was immediately angry, so he picked up a brick and smashed it on the other party's head. If beating someone is cool for a while, how can a just trial allow him to go unpunished? In the end, he fell into the legal net.

Those who beat people must pay the price for their impulsive behavior, and those who beat people should of course bear legal responsibility, and as for what kind of responsibility they should bear, the law is free and arbitrary.

For the person who was beaten, this is a disaster from the sky, and it is just a song, who stipulates that the song of a good day needs to be sung on different occasions, maybe everyone understands better, people hold funerals, you sing a good day there, isn't this looking for a fight? It's okay to think so in your heart, it's not like that if you make this matter, the law is reasonable, not humane, and then you can't reach out to beat someone, this matter won't just pass, and the beaten person will not give up, he should be compensated accordingly, and he can also protect his rights through legal channels.

Let's talk about this defendant again, this defendant Li, this defendant was not a fuel-efficient lamp originally, he was once released on bail pending trial on suspicion of picking quarrels and provoking trouble, and he still has carp tattoos on his body. According to the police investigation, the beater had the experience of taking drugs, and he had been violent since he came out of drug rehabilitation, so it can be said that the incident was not accidental, but also had potential reasons.

The court sentenced Li to the crime of picking quarrels and provoking trouble, and sentenced him to one year and eight months in prison, and compensated the plaintiff for medical expenses, hospitalization and food expenses, medical expenses, nursing expenses, appraisal fees, and transportation expenses totaling 19 yuan.

It can be seen that no matter what the reason, no matter how excited your emotions are, you should control your temper, there are some things that cannot be turned back, and if you are wrong, you will have to bear the consequences.

should be responsible. This kind of chorus of "good days" is a moral issue, and beating people involves legal issues, so the beaters must be held responsible.

should be responsible. Although the man sings "good day" at the funeral, although he should be blamed, he should not be attacked for no reason, and the beater is guilty of intentional wounding.

The beater is also responsible, and if he hits someone up for something, he is committing a crime. Therefore, it is wrong to say that it is wrong to hit someone, do not hit someone.

Although the victim's behavior is immoral, the beater has caused personal injury to the other party, which is a manifestation of the violation of the law, and should bear the corresponding legal responsibility.

The man must be responsible for the beating, and the man was injured. No matter what time it is, it's definitely not right to hit someone.

The beater has broken the law and will be punished, it is not right for him to sing a good life, but you are guilty of intentional injury.

Personally, I think that most of the rapper men who do it themselves are misled by the headlines.

This is an incident that happened in Qingxian County, Hebei Province on August 19, 2020. If I hadn't looked up the news and just made a random comment based on the headline, I would have said that the rapper deserved it, but in fact he was really wronged by the beating.

Let's start with the headline of the news where a man was attacked with bricks while singing "Good Day" at a "funeral". This sentence just sounds like a lack of beating, think about it, people's relatives have just left, the whole family is immersed in sadness, no matter whether the relationship is good or bad, the relatives have to give enough face, the relationship is not good, even if they pretend to be sad, the loss of relatives and friends with a good relationship will cry heartbreaking.

At this time, you go up and sing "good days" to others? When people are crying and grabbing the ground, you go up and sing a song "Good Day"? Not to mention adults, even ignorant children know how to lose their conscience. Of course, if the deceased was a mad man.

And the deceased we mentioned was an ordinary person, and there was no enmity, so at this time, the Venerable Lord's funeral sang "Good Day" and really didn't blame others for beating him.

But when I read the news carefully, I realized that this was not the case.

First of all, the singing man is invited to sing at the funeral, and "invited" means that the relatives who held the funeral invited him, will someone invite a stranger to sing "good days" at the funeral of their relatives? Obviously not, so why would anyone say that he sang about a good life and beat him?

This is because the beater is a former drug addict. According to the family, the assailant had hallucinations a few days before the funeral, and his temper had been very short-tempered, and he always had conflicts with people some time before the funeral.

According to the description of the beater, we know that the beater first asked who asked you to sing here, and then hit him when he saw that he was still there.

From this, we can infer that it was almost because the beater hallucinated, thinking that the beater was singing "good days" and hit him with a brick, and the beaten-up victim suffered purely from unjustified suffering.