How did the dog girl respond to tripping the old man?

She responded that she didn't find out that she tripped the old man, and she didn't want to take the opportunity to escape, but she didn't find out, she just didn't know, she didn't know if she was quibbling, or if she really didn't know.

She felt that it had nothing to do with her, she had no sense of guilt, she felt that the old man was tripped by a dog, which was an accident, and she didn't instruct the dog to do it, and it had nothing to do with herself.

The girl with the dog said that she didn't mean it, and she didn't know that she would trip the old man.

The girl with the dog "responded, "I didn't know that it was the dog leash that tripped the old man at the time" and didn't care about other people's comments. However, the girl has apologized to the family of the elderly for the incident.

The girl responded that she did not see the dog leash tripping the old man at that time, and she was also very scared after the incident, and wanted to go to the door to apologize, regretting that she had brought the dog to the street.

The 12-year-old girl's response was that she didn't see the old man tripping at the time, and she was afraid of having nightmares afterwards. And: "I don't care what people think of me, I know they scold me, and I can't help what they say." ”

After the incident, she was very scared and regretted, and did not dare to read the evaluation of her on the Internet. The girl who led the dog wanted to apologize to the family of the elderly: she should do her duty to save the old man's family at that time.

After tripping the old man, he turned to leave, saying that the dog was not his own.

So this little girl does not need to bear any responsibility because she is not over 14 years old. Moreover, this matter was finally officially judged to be a civil dispute, and there was no criminal liability.

I think it's understandable that the dog leash tripped the old man because of negligence, but I don't think it's forgivable for her to run away directly after she found out that the old man had tripped over.

I think this girl is very lacking in the education of her parents, and there is no discipline in her daily life, and her parents should educate her.

It was the girl's negligence that led to this tragedy, and I hope to educate the girl and realize the seriousness of this matter. I also hope that the whole society will be stricter in disciplining children and that similar things will not happen again.

The little girl's behavior is not good, it has caused harm to the old man, she should apologize to the old man and bear the corresponding responsibility.

I think children still have to be taught, sometimes children can be ignorant. But adults can't get used to her, so such children need to be taught.

1. The girl saw the old man fall to the ground at that time, and she was afraid that she would take responsibility, so she didn't tell the truth.

Second, the girl's parents are unwilling to take responsibility, once said that the dog is not their own and is not responsible, in this case the girl is afraid of being scolded by her parents and is unwilling to tell the truth.

She was afraid to take responsibility. It can be seen that this girl lacks a sense of responsibility and justice, so she will be timid and afraid of things and love to lie.

In order to get rid of responsibility, after all, this girl seemed to be scared at that time, for fear that she would take responsibility. This kind of lying at a young age is afraid of taking responsibility, indicating that family education is insufficient, and you should take it home to educate yourself about social responsibility, as well as how to be responsible for your own affairs.

I think it may be that she doesn't want to take responsibility, after all, the old man's body is very thin, and a fall may have serious consequences.

In fact, both the dog owner and the girl were at fault, the girl took someone else's dog without the owner's consent, which is obviously not right, and she took the dog out without civil capacity, and caused the old man to trip to death. Secondly, because the dog owner did not lock his dog at home, but locked the dog in front of a tree at the door, and did not fulfill the duty of care, which is also a manifestation of irresponsibility. Both the dog owner and the girl were at fault, one did not fulfill their duty of care, and the other took someone else's dog without permission and caused the old man to trip over.

Dog owner and little girl. Dog owners don't take a good look at their dogs and let people take them away; The little girl took someone else's dog without the consent of the dog owner, causing the accident, and both of them were at fault.

The little girl should not take the dog away if she has a mistake, the guardian of the little girl should take good care of her if she has a mistake, and the owner of the dog also has a mistake and should take good care of the dog.

It should be the fault of the girl who took the neighbor's dog and her parents. First, the girl took the dog without the consent of the dog owner and caused the death of another person, only notifying the dog owner after the accident. Secondly, the girl was a minor and her parents did not play a good educational role.

I think it's the little girl's fault, because the little girl took the dog, and the little girl didn't take the dog, so nothing like this would have happened, although he was a minor, the old man evaded responsibility after he fell, and the mistake was even worse.

I think both the girl and the neighbor are at fault. Girls should not take the initiative to lead the neighbor's dog. And the neighbors didn't have a better supervision of their dogs.

The main fault is the girl, and the neighbors are also partly responsible. Because it was the girl who took the dog out to play without authorization, and did not pull the dog's leash properly, the dog ran around, causing the old man to fall and die. On the other hand, the dog owner did not take good care of the dog, which indirectly led to the dog being pulled out.

It was the fault of the girl's parents, who did not fulfill their guardianship responsibilities and let the girl take away the neighbor's dog, which led to the tragedy of the old man.

It's the girl's fault. The accident caused by the girl's failure to control the dog should be borne by the girl, and the girl escaped and killed the old man.