The thief took the mobile phone with his hand, causing him to sleep and eat uneasily, so why did he

The thief took the person's mobile phone with his hand, but he couldn't sleep and eat in his heart, which was puzzling. I want to be a thief, to steal other people's things, and after finally succeeding, why should I be "guilty"? In my opinion, the following reasons can be explained: <>

01. Worried that the owner will come to the door. In the information age, mobile phones are our indispensable communication tools, with the advancement of technology, the functions of mobile phones have gradually improved, and basic mobile phones have positioning functions. Therefore, even if the thief takes the phone away, relying on the location function, the owner may come to the door.

Once the theft is discovered, the thief will not only have to return the phone, but may also go to the police station. If the owner incurs significant losses due to the loss of the phone, the thief will face additional compensation issues. <>

02. If you take other people's money, your heart will be unstable. As the saying goes, there is no such thing as a free lunch. This sentence is very reasonable, and the thinking of normal people is also like this.

When we don't put in the work, no one will want to give us money, so even if others give us money directly, it will be a little uneasy for ordinary people. Indeed, if you don't contribute, why should people treat you well? Stealing is a violation of the moral code of integrity, and people hate stealing, so once the theft of a mobile phone is revealed, it will be laughed at by the friends around you.

03, poor people must have something to hate. Some thieves have a hard time stealing mobile phones, it may be that the family's economic conditions are not good, there is no money to eat, and children choose to steal things if they are not sensible. After succeeding, I felt unbearable and felt that I was sorry for the owner.

It is this tangled psychology that makes the thief feel very difficult. In any case, a person who still feels guilty about stealing other people's things is still saved, he can see right and wrong, but he has fallen because of money. The poor man must have something to hate, and no matter how poor he is, he cannot lose his pride.

When I took the phone away, it was because I was greedy, but because my nature was not bad, it caused me to feel psychologically uneasy.

Passing the mobile phone is a professional instinct, long-term theft has developed a habit, when he does not want to continue to be a thief, unable to overcome the instinct is the biggest problem.

Because people's good and evil are always in an instant, a moment of greed made him do this kind of thing, and he couldn't sleep well afterwards, proving that he still has a good heart.

Because he was greedy for a moment, he took the phone. Afterwards, he was afraid that the owner would find out that he had stolen the phone.

It depends on what you are asked to do, if necessary, of course, you can ask the employee to hand in the mobile phone, and it will be returned to you when the time comes, but if there is no need to force you to hand in your mobile phone, this is probably illegal.

There is no provision for this, that is, the mobile phone is private property, so there is no right to confiscate.

There are no such laws and regulations, but now schools or education departments have regulations that primary and secondary school students are not allowed to bring mobile phones into school, which must be complied with.

Don't do anything out of the ordinary.

The law is a means of protecting people's legitimate interests and punishing those who infringe on people's interests.

Only when someone's interests are harmed can it have a reason to exist.

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology rectifies illegal and criminal fraud and attacks on telegraphic letters

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology issued an announcement saying that from November 2015 to the end of April 2016, 140,000 ** numbers have been shut down, and in the past six months, telecommunications companies have been organized to quickly shut down more than 140,000 ** numbers involving illegal crimes such as communication information fraud. Among them, there are 85,189 basic telecommunications enterprise numbers and 60,202 mobile communication resale enterprise (virtual operator) numbers.

The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology will focus on doing a good job in the real-name registration of ** numbers, organize telecommunications companies to do a good job of quickly shutting down the numbers involved in the case, and curb the spread of communication information fraud.

After the implementation of the "mobile phone real-name system", in the process of disseminating short messages, it can ensure that the user's identity can be identified in each use link, so that the information publisher, disseminator, user and end user can obtain real identity verification, so as to achieve the goal of effectively dividing the rights and responsibilities of information content. Most cell phone crimes use prepaid phones that are not real names. At present, short message service complaints are the most common business in telecommunication service complaints, and the main content of complaints is spam SMS and non-standard operation of service providers.

The implementation of the mobile phone real-name system aims to curb spam text messages such as illegal text messages, fraudulent text messages, and pornographic text messages, standardize operations, and reduce violations and illegal acts through mobile phone text messages. The implementation of the real-name system for mobile phones can also protect the privacy of users

Mobile phones are a means of communication, and the school has no right to prohibit them, and other documents and regulations that conflict with the Constitution are invalid, but the Constitution also stipulates that when enjoying one's own legal rights, the interests of the state, the collective, and the society and infringing on the legitimate rights and interests of others.

If you infringe on the rights and interests of others in the process of using your mobile phone, then you will no longer enjoy this right, for example, playing with your mobile phone in class affects the teacher's teaching and other students' listening to classes, and violates the right to education of others.

Therefore, there is no provision in the national law on whether mobile phones are allowed, but it should be decided according to the regulations of each school.

There is no provision in national law on whether mobile phones are allowed to be carried, and it should be decided according to the regulations of each school, such as Yangjiang City.

In order to strengthen the management of mobile phones, at the beginning of the new school year, Yangjiang No. 1 Middle School issued a ban on mobile phones, prohibiting students from bringing mobile phones into school or using mobile phones on campus.

The school will not conduct physical searches on students, but once a student is found to have brought a mobile phone back to school, it will be regarded as a disciplinary violation and deducted points, which is also one of the quantitative assessment criteria for students. At the same time, the school will also take off the mobile phone and hand it over to the parents for safekeeping. To make it easier for students to connect with their parents, the school has installed 200 landline machines** in more than 800 dormitories.

There is no provision in national law that secondary school students are not allowed to carry mobile phones.

The school has a rule that students are not allowed to bring mobile phones to school, but there is no rule that teachers can confiscate and seize mobile phones.

But schools can never be law enforcement agencies, and some schools stipulate that teachers can be confiscated, which is contrary to the law, and it is a violation of the law that should be repealed as a rule.

The school does not have the right to confiscate or seize students' property, which violates the provisions of the General Principles of the Civil Law that private property (books) are sacred and inviolable, that is, seizure and confiscation can only be exercised by departments that have provisions and authorization in the law, and the law does not stipulate that the school can confiscate or seize students' property, so it is illegal.

This kind of behavior is illegal, and its essence is robbery, the use of violence, coercion or other methods to forcibly occupy other people's property on the spot for the purpose of illegally occupying other people's property.

Article 33 of the Property Law stipulates that in the event of a dispute over the ownership or content of a property right, the interested party may request confirmation of the right.

Article 34 of the Property Law stipulates that if a person does not have the right to possess immovable or movable property, the right holder may request the return of the original property.

Article 35 of the Property Law stipulates that if the property right is obstructed or may be obstructed, the right holder may request the removal of the obstruction or the elimination of the danger.

It is not illegal because the school prohibits students from carrying and using mobile phones. The teacher confiscated the phone and returned it if he took it for himself. That's a violation of the law....

First, according to the law, no matter the school, the teacher is not a law enforcement agency, the student, as a citizen, although a minor, still has the right to property, since it is your thing, the teacher has no right to confiscate, but if you play during class time, the teacher has the right to remind you to collect it.

Article 37 of the Teachers Law: In any of the following circumstances, teachers are to be given administrative sanctions or dismissed by their schools, other educational establishments, or administrative departments for education.

1) Intentionally failing to complete education and teaching tasks, causing losses to education and teaching work;

2) Corporal punishment of students, who do not change after education;

3) Bad conduct, insulting students, and having a bad impact.

Where teachers have any of the circumstances listed in items (2) and (3) of the preceding paragraph, and the circumstances are serious and constitute a crime, criminal responsibility is pursued in accordance with law.

Article 39 of the Property Law The owner shall enjoy the right to occupy, use, benefit from and dispose of his immovable or movable property in accordance with law.

Teachers do not have the right to confiscate students' property. Because neither the teacher nor the school has the right to impose administrative penalties.

Some students used their mobile phones to talk during class, and after the teacher found out, he could only ask the students to hand over their mobile phones to him for temporary safekeeping. After class, students shall be returned in a timely manner. If the teacher takes something that he or she keeps for himself, it constitutes a tort.

It is illegal for a teacher to confiscate a student's mobile phone, and the student has ownership of his or her mobile phone, and no one can infringe upon it. Students can wait until school ends and the teacher wants their phones back.

I'm afraid you're breaking the school rules. The teacher will not confiscate the phone, he can only keep it for you temporarily, and you must return it!

You have to study hard and don't always think about going against the teacher. It's not good for your future!

It is understandable for teachers to confiscate mobile phones based on the consideration of maintaining classroom order, achieving class results and being responsible for students, but schools and teachers only have the right to education management.

I haven't broken any laws, maybe it's for your good, ask your parents to ask her, I have experience! She didn't dare not give.

Are you a child or a parent.

Forget it, let the parents call the teacher **, be polite, and then the teacher will basically give the mobile phone to the child.

If you're a child, do as I say.

Guess you're not a parent.

The main thing is that if you are a child, you say this, the teacher does not bird you at all, if you are a parent, you can only be polite, you can't stiffen with the teacher, otherwise be careful to give your child small shoes to wear.

This is illegal misappropriation of another person's finances.

Teachers can be sued.

The teacher is also for your good, and it is too ruthless to do this.

Let parents call ** and ask the teacher for it

If you don't do it well, the teacher may not give you a good look

Flickering. My phone was also handed over.

Information is looked at the light.

Much worse than you.

Let the parents call the teacher and ask your parents to ask her.