History books say that the United States is also Chinese?

Updated on history 2024-06-08
26 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    There is evidence that the Indians were immigrants of the Mongolian race, but how did they become Chinese? When did China learn about North America? At the time of migration, it was still in the early interglacial period, when the Bering Strait was connected by roads and bridges or was originally one, but later due to the hot climate, the Bering Strait glaciers dissolved, causing the two continents to separate.

    China was a country that was established later, and it had nothing to do with the Indians.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    That history book says so, even the most awesome Genghis Khan has never conquered the Americas, so your history book should be 5 yuan 3 copies, in the stall where a pack of popcorn is delivered... It's all blind jb wrote.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Maybe from the Bering Strait. But it's too much.

    The United States was established under the leadership of Washington, so how can it be said that the United States is also China?

    So the whole world is China's building, Ah Q spirit!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The prevailing view today is that humans originated in the Great Rift Valley, then hominids moved from Africa to Asia, and later Siberians migrated to the Americas from the frozen Bering Strait, presumably during the most recent glacial age. This is the most authoritative statement at present. As for the history book you mentioned, I don't know which one.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    As early as 30,000 years ago, the migration from the Shanxi region of China began to last for more than 10,000 years. The characteristics of the ancient relics along the way prove that their source is the Shanxi region of China.

    The above is the credit of foreign archaeologists.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    If the United States is Chinese.

    The whole world is Chinese.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    This is also too ridiculous, misleading, the Chinese could not run that far in those days.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    No, historically, Mongolia was Chinese.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Although the Chinese have traveled all over Europe, Asia and Africa, and occasionally brought back peppers, sweet potatoes, corn, cotton, etc. from the Americas, who can explain clearly what happened eight lifetimes ago.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    No, the Indians are Mayans.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It can only be said that the Indians are of Asian origin.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    1. Open the door to prevent China from being occupied by the great powers;

    2. Gengzi responded to the war and got the compensation of the Qing State, and then said that he had taken too much, and called on everyone to spit it out for modern education.

    3. Before and after World War II, he always supported the legitimate ** Chiang at that time to fight the enemy, which offended the dynasty.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    China's 5,000 years refers to the history of Chinese civilization, while the United States' more than 200 years refers to the modern national history of the United States, and their civilization history can be traced back 3,000 years. If we want to compare with them, we should start from the founding of the People's Republic of China in 49, or even from the reform and opening up in 78.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    It is always said that China is an ancient civilization of 5,000 years, is this useful, it is not comparable to a country with a history of only more than 200 years, but also to compare, what age is it now, the 21st century, the age of science, it is about the strength of science and technology, friends, now is not to discuss how China used to be a powerful country, it is just a past, the most important thing now is how to make the country strong, so that the country can be a strong country.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    China's 5,000-year-old civilization is not comparable to that of a colonial and unified country.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Countries less than 300 years old compared to China.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    There have been "honeymoon periods" and "cold war periods," and generally speaking, the United States needs this fertile market, but it is also afraid of China, which is developing rapidly, and China's golden mean has always adhered to the position of valuing peace.

    The relationship between China and the United States is a contradiction, and the future direction depends on how the two sides of the contradiction move, change, and develop. Historically, despite constant conflicts and confrontations, China and the United States have had sincere and pragmatic cooperation, and there is also the possibility of peace and cooperation in the future.

    Whether China and the United States can finally break the curse of "inevitable conflict between rising and established countries" and avoid moving towards conflict, confrontation and even war requires the joint efforts of both sides, and the key lies in the policy choices of the two countries, whether to choose mutual trust and cooperation or choose suspicion and confrontation.

    We have seen that China, on the other side of the conflict, has always pursued the strategy of "peaceful development" and a peaceful foreign policy, has no intention of conflict or confrontation with the United States, and has long been committed to the implementation of a new model of major-country relations between China and the United States.

    On the other hand, the United States, on the other side of the contradiction, has always regarded China as its competitor and the biggest threat.

    1. Lack of sincerity.

    Therefore, if the United States does not abandon its erroneous concept of containing China, does not terminate its specific behavior of containing China, does not implement the relevant consensus reached by China and the United States, and does not fulfill its own commitments and obligations, China and the United States will inevitably move towards conflict and confrontation in the future, and repeat the historical tragedy of "the inevitable conflict between the rising country and the established country".

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    As a Chinese, I greatly admire the courage, youth and life of the Flying Tigers who came to China's aid and contributed their lives to China's War of Resistance Against Japan! Remembering them again!!

    However, going back to the post, what I want to say is that the Flying Tigers did contribute to China, but it was the Americans who contributed, not the United States, not the United States, not the United States!

    I'm not playing with words, why do I say that, the reason is, when China resisted Japan, how many regular soldiers did the United States put into China to fight side by side with each other? No, not a single one, **? How much did you vote?

    It's just a little bit, but after the end of the anti-Japanese war, how much did the United States vote in the civil war between the Kuomintang and the Communist Party? The answer is that there are a lot of confessions, and even military experts and observers have come a lot, why, the national interests of the United States, and the only admirable Flying Tigers that everyone is familiar with are the American non-governmental organizations that Chiang asked the United States for help to no avail, and his wife and overseas Chinese contacted each other in the United States, representing American peace-loving people, not the United States!

    Finally, a digression, at the Cairo Conference, in order to fight for its due rights, China fought several major wars with Japan under the circumstances of being very different from Japan's **, drills, supplies, and preparations, and sacrificed how many patriotic youths were sacrificed to win the rights it deserved in the United Nations. After the war, the United States, which occupied Japan, handed over the Diaoyu Islands belonging to China to Japan for management when it returned Japan's right to govern the country, even if the Diaoyu Islands could be handed over to Taiwan in order to contain the red camp in the Cold War at that time, which was in line with their national interests and moral interests, but the Americans were not so simple, haha!

    I hate Japan as a country because of the tragic history of aggression against China, but I do not hate the Japanese, because I believe that the ordinary people of any country are just pursuing a happy life and will not incite aggression against other countries!

    I don't like and hate the United States as a country, because unless the Eight-Nation Coalition has done something bad in China, even if it hurts China, it will be simple, not direct. For the Americans, I feel pretty good!

    I said so much just to show that Americans and Japanese are the same, and ordinary people are the same as Chinese, pursuing a happy life, but when national interests are conflicting, all this (mainly referring to people-to-people exchanges and people-to-people friendship) will be diluted and discarded! There is no need to advocate the good and bad between countries because of some civil affairs!

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    During the anti-Japanese period, after the war, China was brought into normalcy, etc., objectively speaking, the United States treated China relatively mildly among the great powers (before the Cold War era).

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    Aiding China to defeat little Japan, but with other aims.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    The world's resources are a piece of cake, either you eat more or I eat more, of course, everyone wants to eat more. If it is big, it is said that it is the same between countries, and if it is small, it is the same in the workplace, and there will be contention. Animals have a sense of community, and the size of the group depends on how big things are.

    If aliens come to grab the cake, all of humanity will join the group.

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    During the Anti-Japanese War, it helped.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    There must have been, during the War of Resistance Against Japan.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    This should be studied in the American literature from the perspective of the United States on China.

  25. Anonymous users2024-01-18

    I suggest you take a look at Dr. Stavrianos' General History of the World.

    Explain Chinese history with his unique view of global history.

  26. Anonymous users2024-01-17

    Americans don't even care about their own history, let alone Chinese history, and even our history teachers don't know how to distinguish between the Qin and Qing dynasties

Related questions
9 answers2024-06-08

1. The drastic changes in Eastern Europe refer to the fundamental changes in the political and economic systems of various socialist countries in Eastern Europe from the late 80s to the early 90s of the 20th century, and the socialist system eventually evolved into a violent upheaval of the capitalist system. It was the failure of the cause of socialism in Eastern Europe and the low ebb of the world socialist and communist movements. The essence of the drastic changes in Eastern Europe is the change in the nature of society in the countries of Eastern Europe. >>>More

30 answers2024-06-08

Really, I don't know if you have seen the real Suzhou embroidery, I have seen it with my own eyes, it is indeed thin like cicada wings, and on a fast silk cloth can also be embroidered on the front and back of different patterns, such as the front embroidered with the sun and the reverse side embroidered with the moon, etc., of course, the silk cloth used to embroider this double-sided picture will not use that very thin, but when they embroider, they can divide a very thin thread into more than 80 90 strips, which is true, some high-tech masters can also be divided into more than 1 200 roots, And the embroidery and silk cloth inside are all handmade, without any mechanical processing.

7 answers2024-06-08

The characters are as follows:

Emperor Qin and Emperor Wu of Han refer to Emperor Qin Shi Huang and Emperor Wu of Han. >>>More

13 answers2024-06-08

If you have a good foundation in literary language, it is recommended to read the Twenty-Four History, although some places are not very true, but after all, it is an official history book, and I read the Twenty-Four History. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-08

At the end of the Ming Dynasty, a small soldier returned to the Ming Dynasty as a prince.