What impact does the artist s escape have on urban culture?

Updated on culture 2024-06-03
15 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Different classes have different views on this issue, and the first-tier cities of Beijing, Shanghai and Guangzhou, despite the high housing prices and the high cost of living, still attract thousands of talents to these urban centers, including various artists, many popular occupations related to art wood. Marginal talents who can't make money in the city, they are on the edge of the city, in all kinds of places that are not so high-end, engaged in artistic performances.

    In the heart of the city, all kinds of high-end fashion stores and high-end jewelry stores have sprung up one after another, and ordinary artists who are dedicated to art are trying to escape the city. Will there be an impact on the city's culture? Or will this be the result of the regression of urban culture, or even the transformation of cities into commercial empires, and the transformation of urban culture into cultural deserts?

    This is likely to be temporary, with developed cities that can attract more talent and more competition, although driving up prices and the cost of living higher. But in big cities, it means more opportunities and more challenges. Those who have established themselves in the city need more civilized and elegant entertainment, and they are more eager for high-end art.

    In order to attract talents, cities also need various decorations to make urban culture more distinctive.

    The richer you are, the more you need cultural edification, improve your entire taste, and improve the taste and perception of the whole city. It will also attract more high-end artistic talents to serve the city. Although they may not be able to afford the high rent, the rapid urbanization and the well-developed transportation in the surrounding cities allow him to work in the city during the day and stay in the suburbs at night.

    Work in the city during the day and stay in the countryside at night. It also promotes the development and convenience of transportation.

    The city is becoming more and more beautiful, and it is more and more inseparable from the artists who contribute to it. In the future city, as many artists leave as many artists enter, it will not have much impact on urban art, and big cities will always stand at the forefront of the times and lead the pioneer of fashion.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    It will make the city's artistic sense lower, and the city's culture will be lowered.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Urban culture will not be so diverse, it will become monotonous.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    I don't think it has any impact, because the culture of a city is deeply ingrained.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It is not possible to truly show the problems faced by the city. The city will lose its artistic beauty.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Even though the culture is deeply rooted, I think that the departure of artists will have a certain impact to a greater or lesser extent.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Make the city unattractive and monotonous.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Most of what we see now were designed by artists, so we can't do without them.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I don't think the impact is huge, they don't have a big impact on the overall culture of the city.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    I think it will make the quality of the citizens low, and it needs to be influenced by culture.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Artists fleeing the wars of cities occupied by the big rich do not necessarily weaken urban culture. As we all know, the culture of a city depends on artists to carry it forward, but at the same time, the development of these cultures also needs to rely on others. If all the artists in a city are gone, and there are only some uneducated tycoons left, it will definitely weaken the culture of the city; But if the remaining tycoons are literate after the artists are gone, it will not weaken the culture of the city.

    If the artists are gone, and only a lot of cultured rich people remain, then the culture of the city will not be weakened. Although artists are very knowledgeable about culture, there are other people who understand culture, and although they are not artists, they can also carry forward culture. And some rich people are representatives of such people, because some rich people become rich by virtue of their own skills, if they have no culture, there will be no current results, so although the artists are gone, but these rich people can also carry forward the culture of the city.

    Therefore, it is not only those artists in a city who can enhance the culture of the city, but also some wealthy people who have the same effect.

    But if the rich people in a city are uneducated, then the culture in the city will be weakened. The cultured artists in the city are gone, and there are only some uneducated rich people left, who only know that they have some money and don't know what culture is, then the culture in the city will definitely be weakened.

    We can't be directly sure that the war between artists fleeing and the plutocrats taking over the city will weaken the culture of the city, it will change depending on the situation.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    To some extent, but not all. Florida, in its book The New Urban Crisis, takes a different view. In his view, the influence of the super-rich has so far been modest, and the new high-income industries have naturally aspired to high-density places, and that "the so-called death of urban cultural creativity is nothing more than rumors", and that the real sticking point is not the conflict within elites such as the rich and the middle class, but the deteriorating economic situation and growing insecurity of the disadvantaged.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    On the question of whether the escape of artists and the urban wars occupied by the big rich will weaken the urban culture, I personally think that it will. If a city is not embellished by artists, then what can we talk about urban culture?

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The war between the artist and the occupation of the city by the rich first ensured the economic development of the city. Secondly, the urban art created by the artists is guaranteed, but this does not weaken the urban culture.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    It certainly does not weaken the culture of the city, the culture of a city is not weakened by their escape and occupation, the culture of the city is accumulated over a long period of time, and it is also created by the joint efforts of everyone.

Related questions
2 answers2024-06-03

1. Art is to promote life, and there is no art where death is. - Romain Rolland. >>>More

19 answers2024-06-03

yes, places of consumption.

Why a place to consume? You know, artists are generally poorer. But as an artist, you must travel thousands of miles and read thousands of books. >>>More

3 answers2024-06-03

Students who do not have good grades should wait until the regular admission time to apply. The college application process can be especially difficult for students who study hard in high school. The competitive application process may make these students feel like college is out of reach, but it's still an option. >>>More

3 answers2024-06-03

Methods of Linguistic Criticism.

Take Grandma Liu three into the Grand View Garden. >>>More

12 answers2024-06-03

Guan Shan, a famous broadcasting artist, passed away at the age of 86 due to ineffective medical treatment. As soon as the news came out, many people regretted and saddened his passing. It is understood that Guan Shan is a famous broadcasting artist in China and a famous announcer of the former Tianjin People's Broadcasting Station. >>>More