You can t walk your dog before half past ten, netizens say that community regulations infringe on fr

I don't think there's anything wrong with thatThe property also said that it was mainly for large dogs.

To be honest, I don't agree with the phenomenon of large dogs running rampant everywhere in the city, and the phenomenon of dogs biting people in news reports is not uncommon, especially the elderly and children, I myself am afraid of these canine animals, it is good to see the rope, if there is no rope, I will also take a detour, especially sometimes with my days, I will pick up my son and bypass, before I met two dogs at the door of the house, I stared at me from afar, I was creepy, I quickly picked up my son and walked slowlyAs a result, the two dogs ran to my feet and barked wildly, and lay on my legs, at that time it was really scared enough, people said that the mother was just right, I was holding my son and yelled at them and walked away, roaring very fiercely, louder than their barking, and then they did not follow again, but at that time it was really scared not light, back home are still frightened, the two dogs do not know whether it is domestic or wild dogs, and I did not see anyone to take care of it at that time.

So for the matter of raising a dog, I think since you choose to raise a dog, then please tie your rope, after all, it is an animal, no matter how well you train him, he will also have a time when he is out of control, he may not attack you, but don't attach the possibility of this injury to others, so honestly tie the rope, in addition, if you want to raise a large dog, also take the trouble to estimate the feelings of others, try to choose when there are fewer people to go out to walk the dog, don't scare the elderly and children, Don't base your so-called popularity or momentary speed on the panic of others. In addition, if it is a wild dog that no one takes care of, I also suggest that the relevant departments strengthen the management and monitoring of this area, and see how to find a place for this group of animals not to let them live on the streets, so as to harm the people around us, no matter what, human life is still the most precious.

So I can understand the approach of this property, and I also hope that the majority of netizens will put themselves in their shoes, sometimes they really don't be too hypocritical, there is nothing more precious than human life.

I think it's a violation of freedom, and the community has a good starting point for doing this, because there are more people in the community before half past ten, and the elderly and children may be injured by the collision of dogs.

But now that we are all advocating civilized dog walking, these unfavorable behaviors can be avoided.

I think this is a rule set to protect most people, there will be elderly and children walking in the community before half past ten, and some people have big dogs that are not easy to manage, which may hurt the elderly and children.

I think this rule is indeed a bit of an infringement of freedom, and when you want to walk the dog is your own business, why do you have to set the time. However, everyone should raise dogs in a civilized manner, and when walking dogs, they should bring a leash to prevent them from biting people.

I don't think this is an infringement of freedom, but an act to protect the safety of other residents, so I think it should be promoted.

I don't think it's a violation of freedom, precisely because it protects the lives of other people, and it's worth advocating.

It is true that the rules of the community are not very friendly to residents who own dogs, but they also prevent large dogs from scaring the elderly and children in the community.

Summary. Hello dear! <>

It is legal for the community to prohibit dog walking, as the property has the right to make internal management regulations. However, this does not mean that walking your dog is illegal. Walking your dog in public places should follow the relevant legal requirements.

For example, it is necessary to keep the dog safe and avoid the dog running around the street, biting people, or causing damage to other people's property. At the same time, the dog should also be kept on a leash, kept hygienic and clean, and the dog's feces should be cleaned up at all times.

Is it legal to prohibit dog walking in the community.

Hello dear! <>

It is legal for the community to prohibit dog walking, as the property has the right to make internal management regulations. However, this does not mean that walking your dog is illegal. Dogs walking in public should comply with the relevant laws.

For example, it is necessary to keep the dog safe and avoid the dog running around the street, biting people, or causing damage to other people's property. At the same time, the dog should be kept on a leash, kept hygienic and clean, and cleaned up the dog's feces at all times.

Dog walking is a kind of pet breeding behavior in China, and the law has some provisions on the management of pet breeding next to the silver state. For example, pets should be kept in accordance with the requirements of hygiene, safety and civility, and must not disturb social and public order. If the dog has behavior that affects others in a public place, it will generally involve issues such as public security administration penalties.

At the same time, for the serious situation of a dog biting or killing a person, it is even generally related to criminal law issues. [Flowers closed].

Hello dear, is there anything else you don't understand? You can tell the teacher in detail so that the teacher can better answer for you

Your first and second sentences contradict Is it legal to prohibit dog walking in the community.

There is a law that prohibits walking dogs in the community.

Hello dear! <>

According to Article 15 of China's "Urban Management Administrative Law Enforcement Law", pet owners should abide by social morality and management systems, and shall not affect public health and city appearance, and hinder the normal life of others. At the same time, according to Article 61 of the "Animal Epidemic Prevention Law", pet owners shall abide by laws and regulations and public morality in the society, protect animals, and shall not hinder public safety and the normal life of others.

Although there is no clear legal provision prohibiting dog walking in the community, pet owners should follow social morality and management systems, and must not infringe on the normal rest and living order of community residents. Some property management regulations also prohibit dog walking in the community, such as property management service agreements.

Therefore, we should not only raise Lingxu dogs, but also abide by the corresponding law enforcement regulations and property management regulations, respect the rights and interests of others, and jointly protect a good community environment. [Fresh Bu Burning Flowers].

The legality of the ban on dog walking in the community depends on the local laws and regulations and the rules of the community. In China, according to the Animal Epidemic Prevention Law of the People's Republic of China and the Regulations on the Administration of Dog Breeding by Urban Residents, dog owners should comply with relevant regulations, including the use of leashes when walking dogs, and the removal of dog feces when walking dogs. If the community rules prohibit dog walking, then the dog owner should comply with the regulations, otherwise they may be punished accordingly.

In addition, there may also be some controversy over the community's prohibition of dog walking Xunqing. Some people believe that banning dog walking will affect the health and well-being of dogs, as well as the rights and interests of dog owners. Therefore, some places have also issued relevant regulations to protect the rights and interests of dog owners, such as allowing dogs to be walked in designated areas.

In general, the legality of the ban on dog walking in the community needs to be judged according to local laws and regulations and the rules of the community. If you have any questions, it is recommended to consult the relevant local authorities or legal professionals.

The legality of the ban on dog walking in the community depends on local laws and regulations. In some places, the community can make rules prohibiting residents from walking their dogs to ensure the safety and hygiene of the community. Such a provision may be to prevent the dog from biting or causing other trouble.

However, in other places, neighborhoods may not be allowed to prohibit residents from walking their dogs, as this could be seen as a violation of residents' individual rights. Therefore, you need to check the local laws and regulations to understand the legality of the community prohibiting dog walking.

Hello, the question of legality depends on the specific situation. First of all, if your dog is a prohibited dog in your city or district, there is a good reason for this rule; Secondly, when walking the dog, the provisions of the "Animal Epidemic Prevention Law" are not followed: "If you take a dog out of the house, you should wear a dog tag and take measures such as tying a dog leash in accordance with the regulations to prevent the dog from injuring people and spreading the disease."

carried out, it should also be prohibited. If you have met the above conditions, it may be that your Weisui or other residents' dogs have produced a lot of noise and feces, causing noise pollution and environmental pollution, and have been reported and complained by the owner, so the property prohibits dog walking. If your dog is safe, well-behaved and you are a responsible owner, you can make a request to the property.

Cavity Mountain Tour.

Plausible. In the community, there are many elderly and children who go out for a walk at night to relax, and the dog owner is not optimistic about his dog is easy to scare the crowd of people walking, of course, this kind of regulation is not mandatory, but the property to the dog walker a suggestion.

Plausible. Because the amount of ** in the community before half past ten is very large, and the danger of walking the dog is also the greatest at this time, so I think this regulation is very reasonable.

For dog owners, it can't be considered reasonable, but the property is taking into account the danger of large dogs to the owners of non-dog owners in the community, and the starting point is good, but it is too late to take into account the power of dog owners.

This kind of regulation is actually reasonable, because walking the dog may disturb the residents, and the dog may bark.

Plausible. Because there are more people in the community before 10:30, especially some children, this arrangement is reasonable for the safety of residents and to avoid unnecessary disputes.

I think this rule is very reasonable, because before 10:30 there are still people walking around the community, if walking the dog at this time will pose a threat to the lives of others, after 10:30 there is less traffic, this time is just right to walk the dog.

Reasonable is also unreasonable, we need to see from what point of view, reasonable is that people are in the community in the morning is also afraid of dogs hurting people, unreasonable is that time is free, you can walk the dog at any time.

This rule is a two-way way for the residents of the community, and reasonable for the elderly and children, because there is no need to be frightened by large dogs; But for residents who have dogs, it is unreasonable, limiting the time they can walk their dogs.

Such a provision is unreasonable.

Recently, a hot search for a community stipulation that dogs cannot be walked before half past ten in the evening has caused a lot of controversy on the Internet. Many netizens have said that they are leashed in and out of the dog, and they also put a dog on the dog, so why limit us from walking the dog at what time. According to the relevant property report, this regulation is mainly for large dogs, and the elderly in the building are very large, because the elderly have been frightened and have given too many complaints.

In order to address this phenomenon, such a recommendation was issued, and the property to re-emphasize that it is a recommendation and not a regulation. So, do you think such a "regulation" is reasonable? Unreasonable <>

1. Everyone has his or her own personal freedom and has no right to dictate the schedule of others.

In our country, the law stipulates that everyone has his or her own personal freedom, and everyone is equal. This rule of the property is unreasonable, everyone has their own interests and hobbies, and it is not illegal for someone to like to raise a dog, it is a normal behavior. The property rules prohibit dog walking at 10:30 p.m., which also restricts the freedom of most people and hinders the development of people's hobbies.

So I'm not very in favor of this kind of regulation, and even the property doesn't have the authority to dictate my schedule. <>

Second, this method cannot fundamentally solve this problem.

Although the original intention of the property is good, wanting to take care of the elderly, this method is unreasonable and cannot fundamentally solve the problem. There are undoubtedly two reasons why this regulation was introduced, there are many complaints and the elderly are easily frightened. Can the rule that after half past ten in the evening really change the situation, no.

At half past ten in the evening, a large crowd going downstairs to walk the dog will still affect the rest of the elderly, and this impact will be even greater. What the property really needs to do is to make sure that the dogs are able to wear a leash, keep a leash and try not to make loud noises in the building. <>

The original intention of the property is good, but the way it is implemented is not entirely correct. It is hoped that the property can win both as soon as possible and solve this problem as soon as possible.

It's reasonable, it's a bit disturbing to the people when it's too late, and the most important thing is that it's too late, and it's easy to scare people, and it's basically about to enter the rest time at this time.

It is reasonable that walking the dog may cause pollution to the community environment and may also harm the owner, so avoid the ** peak.

Reasonable, some dog lovers walk their dogs unconsciously do not like to leash, and there is a family going out for a walk in the shade during the rush hour after work, which is very likely to be attacked, and choose a later time to avoid residents being attacked

I think it's reasonable to do this, it can prevent people walking on the road at night from being safer, avoid bites, and also allow people who need to rest, to get rest.

I think such a regulation is reasonable, because pet dogs are a certain threat in crowded areas.

I think it's reasonable, because there are more people walking before half past ten, and walking the dog at this time can hurt people.

Of course it is reasonable, otherwise you will affect other people's sleep, affect other people's rest, cause other people's lives to be bad, and hinder other people's lives.

This kind of rule is very much in line with the rules. Because after 10:30, many residents have already fallen asleep, and if the puppy is still barking outside, it will affect the rest of others.