The illustrations of primary school textbooks are controversial, the pictures are not only ugly and

Recently, the topic of textbook illustration has been repeatedly searched, many experts and scholars have expressed their opinions, and relevant departments have also responded. However, many parents realized it in hindsight and knew that the news had fermented for a long time, and they knew that the illustration problem in their children's textbooks was wrong, and they didn't know if it was carelessness or what. But it's no wonder that the People's Education Publishing House, just listening to this name, is probably very relieved.

But judging from the situation that broke out on the Internet, the problem is very serious.

The children in these illustrations have ugly faces, strange behaviors, and the same, all of them are the same, which will have a very bad impact on the children, and it may be subtle and far-reaching, the problem is very serious!

As we all know, primary school students are children between the ages of 6 and 12, and it is the time when they are eager to learn, like to learn and imitate, and it is also the period when they initially accept social norms. They begin to accept the rules, but they are also easily distracted by other information. We see that in some of the illustrations, there are several elementary school students with men and women, and it seems that there are a lot of people in the game of eagle catching chickens, but there is really a problem with the picture.

The girl in the "hen" position was hugged by the "balding" boy in the back, looking frightened. A girl in the back was pulled by the corner of her skirt by the boy behind her, and they all lifted it. This illustration is drawn without considering gender issues at all, and it is inevitable that children will imitate it, which is extremely detrimental to their physical and mental development.

Parents know that at this stage, the school is more "authoritative" than the parents, and the children read the children in the textbooks to do this, and the parents may not be able to speak. This is the influence of behavior and habits, it can also be found and disciplined, but the influence on aesthetics is subtle and long-term.

The children in the illustration have too large eye distances, sparse eyebrows, blurred noses, exaggerated mouths, and stick out their tongues at every turn. Children have been under the influence of such textbooks for a long time, and you can imagine what kind of deflection will happen to their aesthetics.

We don't require the illustrations to be at the level of Chinese painting, but at least they should be normal!

The emergence of this kind of "poisonous" teaching materials poisons the childhood of our current generation and imperceptibly distorts children's aesthetics. In addition, the negative effects on children's physical and mental health and thinking awareness cannot be ignored! The illustrations in the textbook are like a cloud and a rain in the boring text, which will bring beauty and edification to children, make children interested in learning, and subtly improve children's aesthetics, which is far greater than oral education.

For adults, illustrations may be inconspicuous, but children are in the early cognitive stage, and they have a high degree of attention to figurative illustrations and real objects. Appreciating excellent art can protect and improve children's sensitivity and delicacy, and improve their IQ; On the contrary, those shoddy things will only make the child's brain simple and low.

There is nothing more to enlighten children than textbooks, when a person who is exposed to new things for the first time is indeed exposed to these weird and ugly **, the image of something in their hearts will definitely change because of these **, and it may also affect the children's deviation from their beliefs in their hearts.

For example, the red scarf is tied to the waist, and the shoes are worn differently, the posture of men and women is inappropriate, and the characters inside are picking up their clothes, and their eyes are particularly unhealthy.

He said that this is a feeling, but many people can't accept this style of painting, and it feels very weird.

Wu Yong said in a previous interview that his concept of book design has changed from good looking to good reading, which is actually due to the difference in design vision and pattern.

The designers of these illustrated characters have previously said that book design is a feeling.

Sick illustrations are not a matter of beauty and ugliness, cultural invasion should beware of lack of celery, many friends and parents have criticized the content of illustrations, not only "no beauty", but even "children and children are not suitable" content! The illustrations in the textbook have wide foreheads, wide eye distances, flat noses, dull eyes, puffy whole bodies, always open lips, and tongues like to stick out, which can be said to be completely inconsistent with the image of our Chinese, and the image of the Chinese is seriously scandalized.

Everyone has their own aesthetic style in their hearts, but as long as the characters are cute and the content is positive and positive, most parents and students who cover filial piety can still accept it.

It should be judged according to the meaning conveyed by the painting, and if it is more negative energy, then it is a more ugly style.

Speaking of the previous primary school textbook illustrations, everyone can think of it is particularly warm, each character has the characteristics of each character, after all, this primary school textbook illustration is equivalent to an enlightenment for children, is a huge impact. But the current style of illustration in elementary school textbooks is really a little weird.,And no matter which character in it.,Their eyes.,Mouth and nose all look exactly the same.,Can't be described as cute.,It's even a little ugly.。

After all, primary school students have not yet formed three views, for them the design of textbooks is a huge impact, and the number of people used in this kind of primary school textbooks is very large, and the scope is also wide, as such an important textbook, there should be no such mistakes.

Some of the characters in these illustrations have very strange and weird expressions, and the dress looks extremely uncomfortable, and there is no beauty at all, this kind of slightly morbid, seemingly avant-garde illustrations, is really not suitable for elementary school students. In response to everyone's reaction, the People's Education Society also responded, saying that these illustrations will be redrawn, and the publishing house will immediately rectify and redraw the illustrations of these textbooks.

The People's Education Publishing House also responded that it had reflected, and also expressed self-blame and guilt, but their illustrations were questioned and criticized by everyone.

Even if you compare the illustrations of primary school textbooks from more than ten years ago, you can feel the obvious difference, how comfortable the previous style of painting looked, but now the style of painting looks extremely weird.

In fact, everyone's opinion on these illustrations is not only because the characters are not beautifully drawn, but also because some dolphins on the illustrations, tattoos and even some private parts and other problems on the body, this kind of painting and style of painting is really unbearable to look at, after all, for primary school students, the important thing now is not these so-called abstract art.

In response, the Human Education Society said that it has conducted an in-depth investigation, and will change the illustrations according to the needs of parents, and publish new teaching materials this autumn to create a good atmosphere for teenagers.

The People's Education Society issued a statement saying that it has paid attention to the opinions on the covers and illustrations of primary school mathematics textbooks on the Internet, and has begun to redraw the covers and some illustrations of relevant mathematics textbooks, improve the style of painting, and improve the artistic level.

The response of the people's education version has been seriously reflected, and I feel deeply remorseful and guilty, and I would like to express my sincere gratitude to everyone for their concern about the primary and secondary school textbooks.

It definitely needs to be taken seriously. Because education is the foundation of the country, if the teaching materials of the children have become the appearance of the current Senqiao, then how should the flowers of the motherland be correctly guided in the future?

I think it should be taken seriously. Because children love to read these illustrations, what if they don't establish a correct outlook on life and values?

The textbooks that are running now are not only problematic with the illustrations, but also with the content, and students can't understand the textbooks just by looking at them, there is no logic, and they don't know what to do, at best it is a syllabus, forcing students to buy teaching aids, ask for tutors, and attend tutorial classes. It is recommended to use the textbooks of the 80s, the basic knowledge has not changed, the above description is detailed, and students can learn it by self-study, so as to save a lot of educational funds.

Personally, I think that it should be paid attention to, and the issue of children's education cannot be ignored.

The national textbook is the belief of the Chinese people, and the Chinese textbook represents the excellent traditional culture of the Chinese people, and is the virtue of the excellent cultural inheritance of Chinese history.

Cultural self-confidence should start from children, start from teaching orange Shicai to teach children's books, and try to use Chinese stories, characters, and literary works if you can use China! In order to establish cultural self-confidence! Strictly guard against cultural aggression by enemy agents!

What does it mean to have a picture of an old Chinese textbook for a question in a mathematics textbook? The quality of Chinese textbooks, whether they are old or new, is it very high?

The People's Education Society should be checked! However, mobile online games should also be banned, mobile online games are the opium of the new era, so that both adults and minors, are addicted to Tong Dou in it, here, I strongly appeal, Cong Lun socks ban mobile phone network infiltration games!

The state should thoroughly investigate these traitors who collude with the country and the people internally and externally.

The illustrations in primary school texts are more important than words, and the information expressed is richer and more concrete, so the teaching materials that get along with children day and night must not be played at will. At least there must be no aesthetic problems, "the eyes of the masses are bright", everyone thinks it is ugly, and if it is not good-looking, there must be a real problem. Children's education is no trivial matter, which is also a sense of responsibility, and I hope that these uncomfortable illustrations can be eliminated as soon as possible and updated in time.

I don't think that's the case, relatively speaking, some characters with more problems, too rigid not only have certain problems in aesthetics, but also have a certain impact on the growth and development of students, which is not conducive to their input of correct value construction.

It's not like this, it's not that it points out that there are aesthetic problems, but there are problems in other aspects, which is why it causes controversy among everyone.

Recently, the incident related to the illustration of primary school textbooks has attracted widespread attention in the society. Why is that?

On the one hand, the illustration of primary school textbooks reflects the inadequacy of education in China. Most of the illustrations in China's primary school textbooks are created by foreigners, and these illustrations often do not reflect the actual situation of primary school students in China. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In addition, the illustrations in primary school textbooks in China often lack richness and diversity, and the cognitive ability and imagination of primary school students are not well exercised.

On the other hand, the illustration of elementary school textbooks reflects the problems of the education system in our country. At present, China has not yet established a perfect system of nationalized teaching materials, and most of the teaching materials are still created by foreigners. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In addition, China has not yet established a complete national education system, and most of the teachers are foreigners. As a result, primary school students in our country often feel unfamiliar and unfamiliar with the use of these teaching materials.

In short, there are three reasons why the illustration incident of primary school textbooks has attracted widespread attention from the society: first, it reflects the inadequacy of education in China; Second, it reflects the historical stage that China is currently in; Third, it reflects the many problems that China is currently facing.

If you have any questions about the self-test test, do not know the content of the self-test test center, and do not know the local self-test test policy, click on the bottom to consult the official website teacher and receive free review materials: